Cargando…

Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?

BACKGROUND: Analyses of factors that determine quality of perinatal care consistently rely on clinical markers, while failing to assess experiential outcomes. Understanding how model of care and birth setting influence experiences of respect, autonomy, and decision making, is essential for comprehen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niles, P. Mimi, Baumont, Monique, Malhotra, Nisha, Stoll, Kathrin, Strauss, Nan, Lyndon, Audrey, Vedam, Saraswathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1
_version_ 1785035774386765824
author Niles, P. Mimi
Baumont, Monique
Malhotra, Nisha
Stoll, Kathrin
Strauss, Nan
Lyndon, Audrey
Vedam, Saraswathi
author_facet Niles, P. Mimi
Baumont, Monique
Malhotra, Nisha
Stoll, Kathrin
Strauss, Nan
Lyndon, Audrey
Vedam, Saraswathi
author_sort Niles, P. Mimi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Analyses of factors that determine quality of perinatal care consistently rely on clinical markers, while failing to assess experiential outcomes. Understanding how model of care and birth setting influence experiences of respect, autonomy, and decision making, is essential for comprehensive assessment of quality. METHODS: We examined responses (n = 1771) to an online cross-sectional national survey capturing experiences of perinatal care in the United States. We used validated patient-oriented measures and scales to assess four domains of experience: (1) decision-making, (2) respect, (3) mistreatment, and (4) time spent during visits. We categorized the provider type and birth setting into three groups: midwife at community birth, midwife at hospital-birth, and physician at hospital-birth. For each group, we used multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, to estimate the odds of experiential outcomes in all the four domains. RESULTS: Compared to those cared for by physicians in hospitals, individuals cared for by midwives in community settings had more than five times the odds of experiencing higher autonomy (aOR: 5.22, 95% CI: 3.65–7.45), higher respect (aOR: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.72–7.82) and lower odds of mistreatment (aOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10–0.26). We found significant differences across birth settings: participants cared for by midwives in the community settings had significantly better experiential outcomes than those in the hospital settings: high- autonomy (aOR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.66–4.27), respect (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.81–6.14), mistreatment (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11–0.34), time spent (aOR: 8.06, 95% CI: 4.26–15.28). CONCLUSION: Participants reported better experiential outcomes when cared for by midwives than by physicians. And for those receiving midwifery care, the quality of experiential outcomes was significantly higher in community settings than in hospital settings. Care settings matter and structures of hospital-based care may impair implementation of the person-centered midwifery care model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101525852023-05-03 Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter? Niles, P. Mimi Baumont, Monique Malhotra, Nisha Stoll, Kathrin Strauss, Nan Lyndon, Audrey Vedam, Saraswathi Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Analyses of factors that determine quality of perinatal care consistently rely on clinical markers, while failing to assess experiential outcomes. Understanding how model of care and birth setting influence experiences of respect, autonomy, and decision making, is essential for comprehensive assessment of quality. METHODS: We examined responses (n = 1771) to an online cross-sectional national survey capturing experiences of perinatal care in the United States. We used validated patient-oriented measures and scales to assess four domains of experience: (1) decision-making, (2) respect, (3) mistreatment, and (4) time spent during visits. We categorized the provider type and birth setting into three groups: midwife at community birth, midwife at hospital-birth, and physician at hospital-birth. For each group, we used multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, to estimate the odds of experiential outcomes in all the four domains. RESULTS: Compared to those cared for by physicians in hospitals, individuals cared for by midwives in community settings had more than five times the odds of experiencing higher autonomy (aOR: 5.22, 95% CI: 3.65–7.45), higher respect (aOR: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.72–7.82) and lower odds of mistreatment (aOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10–0.26). We found significant differences across birth settings: participants cared for by midwives in the community settings had significantly better experiential outcomes than those in the hospital settings: high- autonomy (aOR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.66–4.27), respect (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.81–6.14), mistreatment (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11–0.34), time spent (aOR: 8.06, 95% CI: 4.26–15.28). CONCLUSION: Participants reported better experiential outcomes when cared for by midwives than by physicians. And for those receiving midwifery care, the quality of experiential outcomes was significantly higher in community settings than in hospital settings. Care settings matter and structures of hospital-based care may impair implementation of the person-centered midwifery care model. BioMed Central 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10152585/ /pubmed/37127624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Niles, P. Mimi
Baumont, Monique
Malhotra, Nisha
Stoll, Kathrin
Strauss, Nan
Lyndon, Audrey
Vedam, Saraswathi
Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
title Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
title_full Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
title_fullStr Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
title_full_unstemmed Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
title_short Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
title_sort examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the us: do provider type and place of birth matter?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nilespmimi examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter
AT baumontmonique examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter
AT malhotranisha examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter
AT stollkathrin examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter
AT straussnan examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter
AT lyndonaudrey examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter
AT vedamsaraswathi examiningrespectautonomyandmistreatmentinchildbirthintheusdoprovidertypeandplaceofbirthmatter