Cargando…
Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
BACKGROUND: Research impact is an emerging measure of research achievement alongside traditional academic outputs such as publications. We present the results of applying the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) in Strok...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y |
_version_ | 1785035780861722624 |
---|---|
author | Ramanathan, Shanthi Lynch, Elizabeth Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Chamberlain, Jan Walker, Frederick Rohan Reeves, Penny Searles, Andrew |
author_facet | Ramanathan, Shanthi Lynch, Elizabeth Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Chamberlain, Jan Walker, Frederick Rohan Reeves, Penny Searles, Andrew |
author_sort | Ramanathan, Shanthi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research impact is an emerging measure of research achievement alongside traditional academic outputs such as publications. We present the results of applying the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke, 2014–2019) and report on the feasibility and lessons from the application of FAIT to a CRE rather than a discrete research project. METHODS: Data were gathered via online surveys, in-depth interviews, document analysis and review of relevant websites/databases to report on the three major FAIT methods: the modified Payback Framework, an assessment of costs against monetized consequences, and a narrative account of the impact generated from CRE-Stroke activities. FAIT was applied during the last 4 years of CRE-Stroke operation. RESULTS: With an economic investment of AU$ 3.9 million over 5 years, CRE-Stroke delivered a return on investment that included AU$ 18.8 million in leveraged grants, fellowships and consultancies. Collectively, CRE-Stroke members produced 354 publications that were accessed 470,000 times and cited over 7220 times. CRE-Stroke supported 26 PhDs, 39 postdocs and seven novice clinician researchers. There were 59 capacity-building events benefiting 744 individuals including policy-makers and consumers. CRE-Stroke created research infrastructure (including a research register of stroke survivors and a brain biobank), and its global leadership produced international consensus recommendations to influence the stroke research landscape worldwide. Members contributed to the Australian Living Stroke Guidelines: four researchers’ outputs were directly referenced. Based only on the consequences that could be monetized, CRE-Stroke returned AU$ 4.82 for every dollar invested in the CRE. CONCLUSION: This case example in the developing field of impact assessment illustrates how researchers can use evidence to demonstrate and report the impact of and returns on research investment. The prospective application of FAIT by a dedicated research impact team demonstrated impact in broad categories of knowledge-gain, capacity-building, new infrastructure, input to policy and economic benefits. The methods can be used by other research teams to provide comprehensive evidence to governments and other research funders about what has been generated from their research investment but requires dedicated resources to complete. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10152619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101526192023-05-03 Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery Ramanathan, Shanthi Lynch, Elizabeth Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Chamberlain, Jan Walker, Frederick Rohan Reeves, Penny Searles, Andrew Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Research impact is an emerging measure of research achievement alongside traditional academic outputs such as publications. We present the results of applying the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke, 2014–2019) and report on the feasibility and lessons from the application of FAIT to a CRE rather than a discrete research project. METHODS: Data were gathered via online surveys, in-depth interviews, document analysis and review of relevant websites/databases to report on the three major FAIT methods: the modified Payback Framework, an assessment of costs against monetized consequences, and a narrative account of the impact generated from CRE-Stroke activities. FAIT was applied during the last 4 years of CRE-Stroke operation. RESULTS: With an economic investment of AU$ 3.9 million over 5 years, CRE-Stroke delivered a return on investment that included AU$ 18.8 million in leveraged grants, fellowships and consultancies. Collectively, CRE-Stroke members produced 354 publications that were accessed 470,000 times and cited over 7220 times. CRE-Stroke supported 26 PhDs, 39 postdocs and seven novice clinician researchers. There were 59 capacity-building events benefiting 744 individuals including policy-makers and consumers. CRE-Stroke created research infrastructure (including a research register of stroke survivors and a brain biobank), and its global leadership produced international consensus recommendations to influence the stroke research landscape worldwide. Members contributed to the Australian Living Stroke Guidelines: four researchers’ outputs were directly referenced. Based only on the consequences that could be monetized, CRE-Stroke returned AU$ 4.82 for every dollar invested in the CRE. CONCLUSION: This case example in the developing field of impact assessment illustrates how researchers can use evidence to demonstrate and report the impact of and returns on research investment. The prospective application of FAIT by a dedicated research impact team demonstrated impact in broad categories of knowledge-gain, capacity-building, new infrastructure, input to policy and economic benefits. The methods can be used by other research teams to provide comprehensive evidence to governments and other research funders about what has been generated from their research investment but requires dedicated resources to complete. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y. BioMed Central 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10152619/ /pubmed/37127659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ramanathan, Shanthi Lynch, Elizabeth Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Chamberlain, Jan Walker, Frederick Rohan Reeves, Penny Searles, Andrew Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title | Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_full | Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_fullStr | Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_short | Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_sort | impact assessment of the centre for research excellence in stroke rehabilitation and brain recovery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramanathanshanthi impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT lynchelizabeth impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT bernhardtjulie impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT nilssonmichael impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT cadilhacdominiquea impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT careyleeanne impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT middletonsandy impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT chamberlainjan impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT walkerfrederickrohan impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT reevespenny impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT searlesandrew impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery |