Cargando…

Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery

BACKGROUND: Research impact is an emerging measure of research achievement alongside traditional academic outputs such as publications. We present the results of applying the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) in Strok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramanathan, Shanthi, Lynch, Elizabeth, Bernhardt, Julie, Nilsson, Michael, Cadilhac, Dominique A., Carey, Leeanne, Middleton, Sandy, Chamberlain, Jan, Walker, Frederick Rohan, Reeves, Penny, Searles, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y
_version_ 1785035780861722624
author Ramanathan, Shanthi
Lynch, Elizabeth
Bernhardt, Julie
Nilsson, Michael
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Carey, Leeanne
Middleton, Sandy
Chamberlain, Jan
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Reeves, Penny
Searles, Andrew
author_facet Ramanathan, Shanthi
Lynch, Elizabeth
Bernhardt, Julie
Nilsson, Michael
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Carey, Leeanne
Middleton, Sandy
Chamberlain, Jan
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Reeves, Penny
Searles, Andrew
author_sort Ramanathan, Shanthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research impact is an emerging measure of research achievement alongside traditional academic outputs such as publications. We present the results of applying the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke, 2014–2019) and report on the feasibility and lessons from the application of FAIT to a CRE rather than a discrete research project. METHODS: Data were gathered via online surveys, in-depth interviews, document analysis and review of relevant websites/databases to report on the three major FAIT methods: the modified Payback Framework, an assessment of costs against monetized consequences, and a narrative account of the impact generated from CRE-Stroke activities. FAIT was applied during the last 4 years of CRE-Stroke operation. RESULTS: With an economic investment of AU$ 3.9 million over 5 years, CRE-Stroke delivered a return on investment that included AU$ 18.8 million in leveraged grants, fellowships and consultancies. Collectively, CRE-Stroke members produced 354 publications that were accessed 470,000 times and cited over 7220 times. CRE-Stroke supported 26 PhDs, 39 postdocs and seven novice clinician researchers. There were 59 capacity-building events benefiting 744 individuals including policy-makers and consumers. CRE-Stroke created research infrastructure (including a research register of stroke survivors and a brain biobank), and its global leadership produced international consensus recommendations to influence the stroke research landscape worldwide. Members contributed to the Australian Living Stroke Guidelines: four researchers’ outputs were directly referenced. Based only on the consequences that could be monetized, CRE-Stroke returned AU$ 4.82 for every dollar invested in the CRE. CONCLUSION: This case example in the developing field of impact assessment illustrates how researchers can use evidence to demonstrate and report the impact of and returns on research investment. The prospective application of FAIT by a dedicated research impact team demonstrated impact in broad categories of knowledge-gain, capacity-building, new infrastructure, input to policy and economic benefits. The methods can be used by other research teams to provide comprehensive evidence to governments and other research funders about what has been generated from their research investment but requires dedicated resources to complete. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101526192023-05-03 Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery Ramanathan, Shanthi Lynch, Elizabeth Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Chamberlain, Jan Walker, Frederick Rohan Reeves, Penny Searles, Andrew Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Research impact is an emerging measure of research achievement alongside traditional academic outputs such as publications. We present the results of applying the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke, 2014–2019) and report on the feasibility and lessons from the application of FAIT to a CRE rather than a discrete research project. METHODS: Data were gathered via online surveys, in-depth interviews, document analysis and review of relevant websites/databases to report on the three major FAIT methods: the modified Payback Framework, an assessment of costs against monetized consequences, and a narrative account of the impact generated from CRE-Stroke activities. FAIT was applied during the last 4 years of CRE-Stroke operation. RESULTS: With an economic investment of AU$ 3.9 million over 5 years, CRE-Stroke delivered a return on investment that included AU$ 18.8 million in leveraged grants, fellowships and consultancies. Collectively, CRE-Stroke members produced 354 publications that were accessed 470,000 times and cited over 7220 times. CRE-Stroke supported 26 PhDs, 39 postdocs and seven novice clinician researchers. There were 59 capacity-building events benefiting 744 individuals including policy-makers and consumers. CRE-Stroke created research infrastructure (including a research register of stroke survivors and a brain biobank), and its global leadership produced international consensus recommendations to influence the stroke research landscape worldwide. Members contributed to the Australian Living Stroke Guidelines: four researchers’ outputs were directly referenced. Based only on the consequences that could be monetized, CRE-Stroke returned AU$ 4.82 for every dollar invested in the CRE. CONCLUSION: This case example in the developing field of impact assessment illustrates how researchers can use evidence to demonstrate and report the impact of and returns on research investment. The prospective application of FAIT by a dedicated research impact team demonstrated impact in broad categories of knowledge-gain, capacity-building, new infrastructure, input to policy and economic benefits. The methods can be used by other research teams to provide comprehensive evidence to governments and other research funders about what has been generated from their research investment but requires dedicated resources to complete. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y. BioMed Central 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10152619/ /pubmed/37127659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ramanathan, Shanthi
Lynch, Elizabeth
Bernhardt, Julie
Nilsson, Michael
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Carey, Leeanne
Middleton, Sandy
Chamberlain, Jan
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Reeves, Penny
Searles, Andrew
Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_full Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_fullStr Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_short Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_sort impact assessment of the centre for research excellence in stroke rehabilitation and brain recovery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00974-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanathanshanthi impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT lynchelizabeth impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT bernhardtjulie impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT nilssonmichael impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT cadilhacdominiquea impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT careyleeanne impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT middletonsandy impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT chamberlainjan impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT walkerfrederickrohan impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT reevespenny impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT searlesandrew impactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery