Cargando…

How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?

BACKGROUND: Widening participation (WP) for underrepresented students through six-year gateway courses helps to widen the demographic representation of doctors in the UK. ‘Most students from gateway courses graduate, even though many enter with lower grades than standard entry medicine students.’ Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmansouri, Ahmad, Curtis, Sally, Nursaw, Ceri, Smith, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04179-3
_version_ 1785035794300272640
author Elmansouri, Ahmad
Curtis, Sally
Nursaw, Ceri
Smith, Daniel
author_facet Elmansouri, Ahmad
Curtis, Sally
Nursaw, Ceri
Smith, Daniel
author_sort Elmansouri, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Widening participation (WP) for underrepresented students through six-year gateway courses helps to widen the demographic representation of doctors in the UK. ‘Most students from gateway courses graduate, even though many enter with lower grades than standard entry medicine students.’ This study aims to compare the graduate outcomes of gateway and SEM cohorts from the same universities. METHODS: Data from 2007–13 from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) were available for graduates of gateway and SEM courses at three UK medical schools. Outcome measures were passing an entry exam on the first attempt, Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) outcome and being offered a level one training position from the first application. The univariate analysis compared the two groups. Logistic regressions, predicting outcomes by course type, controlled for attainment on completion of medical school. RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred forty-five doctors were included in the analysis. There was no difference found in the ARCP outcome between gateway and SEM graduates. Gateway graduates were less likely to pass their first attempt at any membership exam than graduates of SEM courses (39% vs 63%). Gateway graduates were less likely to be offered a level 1 training position on their first application (75% vs 82%). Graduates of gateway courses were more likely to apply to General Practitioner (GP) training programmes than SEM graduates (56% vs 39%). CONCLUSIONS: Gateway courses increase the diversity of backgrounds represented within the profession and importantly the number of applications to GP training. However, differences in cohort performance are shown to continue to exist in the postgraduate arena and further research is required to ascertain the reasons for this. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04179-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101527082023-05-03 How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools? Elmansouri, Ahmad Curtis, Sally Nursaw, Ceri Smith, Daniel BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Widening participation (WP) for underrepresented students through six-year gateway courses helps to widen the demographic representation of doctors in the UK. ‘Most students from gateway courses graduate, even though many enter with lower grades than standard entry medicine students.’ This study aims to compare the graduate outcomes of gateway and SEM cohorts from the same universities. METHODS: Data from 2007–13 from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) were available for graduates of gateway and SEM courses at three UK medical schools. Outcome measures were passing an entry exam on the first attempt, Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) outcome and being offered a level one training position from the first application. The univariate analysis compared the two groups. Logistic regressions, predicting outcomes by course type, controlled for attainment on completion of medical school. RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred forty-five doctors were included in the analysis. There was no difference found in the ARCP outcome between gateway and SEM graduates. Gateway graduates were less likely to pass their first attempt at any membership exam than graduates of SEM courses (39% vs 63%). Gateway graduates were less likely to be offered a level 1 training position on their first application (75% vs 82%). Graduates of gateway courses were more likely to apply to General Practitioner (GP) training programmes than SEM graduates (56% vs 39%). CONCLUSIONS: Gateway courses increase the diversity of backgrounds represented within the profession and importantly the number of applications to GP training. However, differences in cohort performance are shown to continue to exist in the postgraduate arena and further research is required to ascertain the reasons for this. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04179-3. BioMed Central 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10152708/ /pubmed/37131153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04179-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Elmansouri, Ahmad
Curtis, Sally
Nursaw, Ceri
Smith, Daniel
How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
title How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
title_full How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
title_fullStr How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
title_full_unstemmed How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
title_short How do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
title_sort how do the post-graduation outcomes of students from gateway courses compare to those from standard entry medicine courses at the same medical schools?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04179-3
work_keys_str_mv AT elmansouriahmad howdothepostgraduationoutcomesofstudentsfromgatewaycoursescomparetothosefromstandardentrymedicinecoursesatthesamemedicalschools
AT curtissally howdothepostgraduationoutcomesofstudentsfromgatewaycoursescomparetothosefromstandardentrymedicinecoursesatthesamemedicalschools
AT nursawceri howdothepostgraduationoutcomesofstudentsfromgatewaycoursescomparetothosefromstandardentrymedicinecoursesatthesamemedicalschools
AT smithdaniel howdothepostgraduationoutcomesofstudentsfromgatewaycoursescomparetothosefromstandardentrymedicinecoursesatthesamemedicalschools