Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Vernonia cinerea (VC) and nortriptyline for smoking cessation. A randomized, active-comparator, open-label trial was conducted in 2019. A total of 84 patients participated in the study, and equally randomized with 42 participants in each group....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krissanaporn, Krissanaporn, Budkaew, Jiratha, Sorncha, Nithikorn, Chumworathayi, Bandit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36708558
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.1.101
_version_ 1785035823950856192
author Krissanaporn, Krissanaporn
Budkaew, Jiratha
Sorncha, Nithikorn
Chumworathayi, Bandit
author_facet Krissanaporn, Krissanaporn
Budkaew, Jiratha
Sorncha, Nithikorn
Chumworathayi, Bandit
author_sort Krissanaporn, Krissanaporn
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Vernonia cinerea (VC) and nortriptyline for smoking cessation. A randomized, active-comparator, open-label trial was conducted in 2019. A total of 84 patients participated in the study, and equally randomized with 42 participants in each group. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference of continuous abstinence rate (CAR) between VC and nortriptyline group (Odd ratio 0.68, 95%CI 0.25-1.85, P=0.451). After week 12, the end of treatment, CAR between both groups was not different (44.44% vs 45.95%, Odd ratio 0.77, 95%CI 0.23–2.54, P>0.999). After follow up by the end of research at week 24, the CAR in both groups was not different (41.67% vs 43.24%, Odd ratio 0.76, 95%CI 0.23–2.55, P>0.999). After week 24, relapse rate between VC and nortriptyline group was not different (13.89% vs 10.81%, P=0.923). In addition, both groups were effective in reducing the number of cigarettes per day compared to baseline. However, there was no difference between the groups. Overall, the VC group had an 8% smoking rate less than nortriptyline group, but not statistically significant (IRR 0.92, 95%CI 0.59-1.43, P=0.702). They also resulted in reducing the exhaled CO level at treatment period and wash out period (at week 12; 7(-17-20) vs 7(-12-16), mean difference 0.78, 95%CI -3.07-4.63, P>0.999, at week 24; 8(-5-22) vs 8.5(-5-17), mean difference 0.39, 95%CI -3.46-4.24, P>0.999). Overall, there was no difference between either group (mean difference -0.31, 95%CI -3.10-2.47). For safety data, adverse events including tongue bitter taste or numbness were found in VC group to be greater than in nortriptyline group (61.9% vs 30.95%, P=0.004), whereas dry mouth and drowsiness were greater found in nortriptyline group (35.71% vs 90.48%, P<0.001 and 16.67% vs 90.48%, P<0.001, respectively). Serious adverse events were not found. In smoking cessation, efficacy and safety of either VC or nortriptyline showed no difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101528722023-05-03 Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial Krissanaporn, Krissanaporn Budkaew, Jiratha Sorncha, Nithikorn Chumworathayi, Bandit Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Vernonia cinerea (VC) and nortriptyline for smoking cessation. A randomized, active-comparator, open-label trial was conducted in 2019. A total of 84 patients participated in the study, and equally randomized with 42 participants in each group. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference of continuous abstinence rate (CAR) between VC and nortriptyline group (Odd ratio 0.68, 95%CI 0.25-1.85, P=0.451). After week 12, the end of treatment, CAR between both groups was not different (44.44% vs 45.95%, Odd ratio 0.77, 95%CI 0.23–2.54, P>0.999). After follow up by the end of research at week 24, the CAR in both groups was not different (41.67% vs 43.24%, Odd ratio 0.76, 95%CI 0.23–2.55, P>0.999). After week 24, relapse rate between VC and nortriptyline group was not different (13.89% vs 10.81%, P=0.923). In addition, both groups were effective in reducing the number of cigarettes per day compared to baseline. However, there was no difference between the groups. Overall, the VC group had an 8% smoking rate less than nortriptyline group, but not statistically significant (IRR 0.92, 95%CI 0.59-1.43, P=0.702). They also resulted in reducing the exhaled CO level at treatment period and wash out period (at week 12; 7(-17-20) vs 7(-12-16), mean difference 0.78, 95%CI -3.07-4.63, P>0.999, at week 24; 8(-5-22) vs 8.5(-5-17), mean difference 0.39, 95%CI -3.46-4.24, P>0.999). Overall, there was no difference between either group (mean difference -0.31, 95%CI -3.10-2.47). For safety data, adverse events including tongue bitter taste or numbness were found in VC group to be greater than in nortriptyline group (61.9% vs 30.95%, P=0.004), whereas dry mouth and drowsiness were greater found in nortriptyline group (35.71% vs 90.48%, P<0.001 and 16.67% vs 90.48%, P<0.001, respectively). Serious adverse events were not found. In smoking cessation, efficacy and safety of either VC or nortriptyline showed no difference. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10152872/ /pubmed/36708558 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.1.101 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Krissanaporn, Krissanaporn
Budkaew, Jiratha
Sorncha, Nithikorn
Chumworathayi, Bandit
Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
title Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Vernonia cinerea for Smoking Cessation: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of vernonia cinerea for smoking cessation: an open-label randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36708558
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.1.101
work_keys_str_mv AT krissanapornkrissanaporn efficacyandsafetyofvernoniacinereaforsmokingcessationanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT budkaewjiratha efficacyandsafetyofvernoniacinereaforsmokingcessationanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sornchanithikorn efficacyandsafetyofvernoniacinereaforsmokingcessationanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chumworathayibandit efficacyandsafetyofvernoniacinereaforsmokingcessationanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial