Cargando…

Mapping parents’ journey following prenatal diagnosis of CHD: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To better understand parents’ accounts of their prenatal and postnatal experience after prenatal diagnosis of CHD – particularly emotional processing and coping mechanisms – to identify strategies to improve support. METHODS: This single-centre, longitudinal qualitative study included pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Kelly W., Hammack-Aviran, Catherine M., Brelsford, Kathleen M., Kavanaugh-McHugh, Ann, Clayton, Ellen Wright
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1047951122002505
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To better understand parents’ accounts of their prenatal and postnatal experience after prenatal diagnosis of CHD – particularly emotional processing and coping mechanisms – to identify strategies to improve support. METHODS: This single-centre, longitudinal qualitative study included pregnant mothers and their support persons seen in Fetal Cardiology Clinic at Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital from May through August 2019 for probable complex CHD. Twenty-seven individuals from 17 families participated in 62 phone interviews during pregnancy and postpartum: 27 conducted after the initial prenatal cardiology consultation, 15 after a follow-up prenatal visit, and 20 after birth. Applied thematic analysis approach was used to code and analyse transcribed interviews. Coding and codebook revisions occurred iteratively; intercoder reliability was >80%. RESULTS: Patients included mothers (16 [59%]), fathers (8 [30%]), and other support persons (3 [11%]). Initial fetal diagnoses included a range of moderate to severe CHD. Prenatally, parents sought to maintain hope while understanding the diagnosis; planning for the future rather than focusing on day-to-day was more common if prognoses were better. Postnatally, with confirmation of prenatal diagnoses, parents’ sense of control expanded, and they desired more active engagement in clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: To enhance effective communication and support, understanding how parents conceptualise hope in relation to diagnosis and how that may evolve overtime is critical. Expectant parents whose child has a significant risk of mortality may demonstrate hope by focusing on positivity. As prognostic uncertainty diminishes postpartum, the parental role on the team may shift, requiring clinicians to provide different support.