Cargando…
A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an individual’s degree of psychological resilience can be determined from physiological metrics passively collected from a wearable device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed in this secondary analysis of the Warrior Watch Study dataset, a prospective cohort of he...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad029 |
_version_ | 1785035849772040192 |
---|---|
author | Hirten, Robert P Suprun, Maria Danieletto, Matteo Zweig, Micol Golden, Eddye Pyzik, Renata Kaur, Sparshdeep Helmus, Drew Biello, Anthony Landell, Kyle Rodrigues, Jovita Bottinger, Erwin P Keefer, Laurie Charney, Dennis Nadkarni, Girish N Suarez-Farinas, Mayte Fayad, Zahi A |
author_facet | Hirten, Robert P Suprun, Maria Danieletto, Matteo Zweig, Micol Golden, Eddye Pyzik, Renata Kaur, Sparshdeep Helmus, Drew Biello, Anthony Landell, Kyle Rodrigues, Jovita Bottinger, Erwin P Keefer, Laurie Charney, Dennis Nadkarni, Girish N Suarez-Farinas, Mayte Fayad, Zahi A |
author_sort | Hirten, Robert P |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an individual’s degree of psychological resilience can be determined from physiological metrics passively collected from a wearable device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed in this secondary analysis of the Warrior Watch Study dataset, a prospective cohort of healthcare workers enrolled across 7 hospitals in New York City. Subjects wore an Apple Watch for the duration of their participation. Surveys were collected measuring resilience, optimism, and emotional support at baseline. RESULTS: We evaluated data from 329 subjects (mean age 37.4 years, 37.1% male). Across all testing sets, gradient-boosting machines (GBM) and extreme gradient-boosting models performed best for high- versus low-resilience prediction, stratified on a median Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 score of 6 (interquartile range = 5–7), with an AUC of 0.60. When predicting resilience as a continuous variable, multivariate linear models had a correlation of 0.24 (P = .029) and RMSE of 1.37 in the testing data. A positive psychological construct, comprised of resilience, optimism, and emotional support was also evaluated. The oblique random forest method performed best in estimating high- versus low-composite scores stratified on a median of 32.5, with an AUC of 0.65, a sensitivity of 0.60, and a specificity of 0.70. DISCUSSION: In a post hoc analysis, machine learning models applied to physiological metrics collected from wearable devices had some predictive ability in identifying resilience states and a positive psychological construct. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the further assessment of psychological characteristics from passively collected wearable data in dedicated studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10152991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101529912023-05-03 A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort Hirten, Robert P Suprun, Maria Danieletto, Matteo Zweig, Micol Golden, Eddye Pyzik, Renata Kaur, Sparshdeep Helmus, Drew Biello, Anthony Landell, Kyle Rodrigues, Jovita Bottinger, Erwin P Keefer, Laurie Charney, Dennis Nadkarni, Girish N Suarez-Farinas, Mayte Fayad, Zahi A JAMIA Open Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an individual’s degree of psychological resilience can be determined from physiological metrics passively collected from a wearable device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed in this secondary analysis of the Warrior Watch Study dataset, a prospective cohort of healthcare workers enrolled across 7 hospitals in New York City. Subjects wore an Apple Watch for the duration of their participation. Surveys were collected measuring resilience, optimism, and emotional support at baseline. RESULTS: We evaluated data from 329 subjects (mean age 37.4 years, 37.1% male). Across all testing sets, gradient-boosting machines (GBM) and extreme gradient-boosting models performed best for high- versus low-resilience prediction, stratified on a median Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 score of 6 (interquartile range = 5–7), with an AUC of 0.60. When predicting resilience as a continuous variable, multivariate linear models had a correlation of 0.24 (P = .029) and RMSE of 1.37 in the testing data. A positive psychological construct, comprised of resilience, optimism, and emotional support was also evaluated. The oblique random forest method performed best in estimating high- versus low-composite scores stratified on a median of 32.5, with an AUC of 0.65, a sensitivity of 0.60, and a specificity of 0.70. DISCUSSION: In a post hoc analysis, machine learning models applied to physiological metrics collected from wearable devices had some predictive ability in identifying resilience states and a positive psychological construct. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the further assessment of psychological characteristics from passively collected wearable data in dedicated studies. Oxford University Press 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10152991/ /pubmed/37143859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad029 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Hirten, Robert P Suprun, Maria Danieletto, Matteo Zweig, Micol Golden, Eddye Pyzik, Renata Kaur, Sparshdeep Helmus, Drew Biello, Anthony Landell, Kyle Rodrigues, Jovita Bottinger, Erwin P Keefer, Laurie Charney, Dennis Nadkarni, Girish N Suarez-Farinas, Mayte Fayad, Zahi A A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
title | A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
title_full | A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
title_fullStr | A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
title_short | A machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
title_sort | machine learning approach to determine resilience utilizing wearable device data: analysis of an observational cohort |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirtenrobertp amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT suprunmaria amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT danielettomatteo amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT zweigmicol amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT goldeneddye amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT pyzikrenata amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT kaursparshdeep amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT helmusdrew amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT bielloanthony amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT landellkyle amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT rodriguesjovita amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT bottingererwinp amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT keeferlaurie amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT charneydennis amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT nadkarnigirishn amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT suarezfarinasmayte amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT fayadzahia amachinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT hirtenrobertp machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT suprunmaria machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT danielettomatteo machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT zweigmicol machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT goldeneddye machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT pyzikrenata machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT kaursparshdeep machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT helmusdrew machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT bielloanthony machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT landellkyle machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT rodriguesjovita machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT bottingererwinp machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT keeferlaurie machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT charneydennis machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT nadkarnigirishn machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT suarezfarinasmayte machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort AT fayadzahia machinelearningapproachtodetermineresilienceutilizingwearabledevicedataanalysisofanobservationalcohort |