Cargando…

Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study

Whilst burn-related mortality is rare in high-income countries, there are unique features related to prognostication that make examination of decision-making practices important to explore. Compared to other kinds of trauma, burn patients (even those with nonsurvivable injuries) may be relatively st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tracy, Lincoln M, Gold, Michelle, Reeder, Sandra, Cleland, Heather J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac017
_version_ 1785035850009018368
author Tracy, Lincoln M
Gold, Michelle
Reeder, Sandra
Cleland, Heather J
author_facet Tracy, Lincoln M
Gold, Michelle
Reeder, Sandra
Cleland, Heather J
author_sort Tracy, Lincoln M
collection PubMed
description Whilst burn-related mortality is rare in high-income countries, there are unique features related to prognostication that make examination of decision-making practices important to explore. Compared to other kinds of trauma, burn patients (even those with nonsurvivable injuries) may be relatively stable after injury initially. Complications or patient comorbidity may make it clear later in the clinical trajectory that ongoing treatment is futile. Burn care clinicians are therefore required to make decisions regarding the withholding or withdrawal of treatment in patients with potentially nonsurvivable burn injury. There is yet to be a comprehensive investigation of treatment decision practices following burn injury in Australia and New Zealand. Data for patients admitted to specialist burn services between July 2009 and June 2020 were obtained from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand. Patients were grouped according to treatment decision: palliative management, active treatment withdrawn, and active treatment until death. Predictors of treatment initiation and withholding or withdrawing treatment within 24 hours were assessed using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Descriptive comparisons between treatment groups were made. Of the 32,186 patients meeting study inclusion criteria, 327 (1.0%) died prior to discharge. Fifty-six patients were treated initially with palliative intent and 227 patients had active treatment initiated and later withdrawn. Increasing age and burn size reduced the odds of having active treatment initiated. We demonstrate differences in demographic and injury severity characteristics as well as end of life decision-making timing between different treatment pathways pursued for patients who die in-hospital. Our next step into the decision-making process is to gain a greater understanding of the clinician’s perspective (eg, through surveys and/or interviews).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101529932023-05-03 Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study Tracy, Lincoln M Gold, Michelle Reeder, Sandra Cleland, Heather J J Burn Care Res Original Articles Whilst burn-related mortality is rare in high-income countries, there are unique features related to prognostication that make examination of decision-making practices important to explore. Compared to other kinds of trauma, burn patients (even those with nonsurvivable injuries) may be relatively stable after injury initially. Complications or patient comorbidity may make it clear later in the clinical trajectory that ongoing treatment is futile. Burn care clinicians are therefore required to make decisions regarding the withholding or withdrawal of treatment in patients with potentially nonsurvivable burn injury. There is yet to be a comprehensive investigation of treatment decision practices following burn injury in Australia and New Zealand. Data for patients admitted to specialist burn services between July 2009 and June 2020 were obtained from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand. Patients were grouped according to treatment decision: palliative management, active treatment withdrawn, and active treatment until death. Predictors of treatment initiation and withholding or withdrawing treatment within 24 hours were assessed using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Descriptive comparisons between treatment groups were made. Of the 32,186 patients meeting study inclusion criteria, 327 (1.0%) died prior to discharge. Fifty-six patients were treated initially with palliative intent and 227 patients had active treatment initiated and later withdrawn. Increasing age and burn size reduced the odds of having active treatment initiated. We demonstrate differences in demographic and injury severity characteristics as well as end of life decision-making timing between different treatment pathways pursued for patients who die in-hospital. Our next step into the decision-making process is to gain a greater understanding of the clinician’s perspective (eg, through surveys and/or interviews). Oxford University Press 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10152993/ /pubmed/35170735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac017 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tracy, Lincoln M
Gold, Michelle
Reeder, Sandra
Cleland, Heather J
Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study
title Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study
title_full Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study
title_fullStr Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study
title_short Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study
title_sort treatment decisions in patients with potentially nonsurvivable burn injury in australia and new zealand: a registry-based study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac017
work_keys_str_mv AT tracylincolnm treatmentdecisionsinpatientswithpotentiallynonsurvivableburninjuryinaustraliaandnewzealandaregistrybasedstudy
AT goldmichelle treatmentdecisionsinpatientswithpotentiallynonsurvivableburninjuryinaustraliaandnewzealandaregistrybasedstudy
AT reedersandra treatmentdecisionsinpatientswithpotentiallynonsurvivableburninjuryinaustraliaandnewzealandaregistrybasedstudy
AT clelandheatherj treatmentdecisionsinpatientswithpotentiallynonsurvivableburninjuryinaustraliaandnewzealandaregistrybasedstudy