Cargando…

Spatiotemporal dynamics across visual cortical laminae support a predictive coding framework for interpreting mismatch responses

Context modulates neocortical processing of sensory data. Unexpected visual stimuli elicit large responses in primary visual cortex (V1) -- a phenomenon known as deviance detection (DD) at the neural level, or “mismatch negativity” (MMN) when measured with EEG. It remains unclear how visual DD/MMN s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallimore, Connor G., Ricci, David, Hamm, Jordan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.17.537173
Descripción
Sumario:Context modulates neocortical processing of sensory data. Unexpected visual stimuli elicit large responses in primary visual cortex (V1) -- a phenomenon known as deviance detection (DD) at the neural level, or “mismatch negativity” (MMN) when measured with EEG. It remains unclear how visual DD/MMN signals emerge across cortical layers, in temporal relation to the onset of deviant stimuli, and with respect to brain oscillations. Here we employed a visual “oddball” sequence – a classic paradigm for studying aberrant DD/MMN in neuropsychiatric populations – and recorded local field potentials in V1 of awake mice with 16-channel multielectrode arrays. Multiunit activity and current source density profiles showed that while basic adaptation to redundant stimuli was present early (50ms) in layer 4 responses, DD emerged later (150–230ms) in supragranular layers (L2/3). This DD signal coincided with increased delta/theta (2–7Hz) and high-gamma (70–80Hz) oscillations in L2/3 and decreased beta oscillations (26–36hz) in L1. These results clarify the neocortical dynamics elicited during an oddball paradigm at a microcircuit level. They are consistent with a predictive coding framework, which posits that predictive suppression is present in cortical feed-back circuits, which synapse in L1, while “prediction errors” engage cortical feed-forward processing streams, which emanate from L2/3.