Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
INTRODUCTION: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144169 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20 |
_version_ | 1785035980945752064 |
---|---|
author | Khare, Komal Bhusari, Prashant Soni, Abhishek Malagi, Sachin K. Abraham, Dennis Johnson, Lynn |
author_facet | Khare, Komal Bhusari, Prashant Soni, Abhishek Malagi, Sachin K. Abraham, Dennis Johnson, Lynn |
author_sort | Khare, Komal |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can provide only temporary and unpredictable desensitization. Therefore, new treatment methods that are effective for long periods and at the same time do not have the complications are needed. Recently, two new desensitizing agents BioMin F and Propolis have been introduced for the treatment of DH. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without the use of an adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five freshly extracted teeth were taken out of which thirty were sectioned into halves and divided into four test groups BioMin F, Propolis, BioMin F + Laser, and Propolis + Laser and control group. All the specimens were treated twice a day for 7 days and then evaluated under scanning electron microscope for partial and complete dentinal tubule occlusion. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of completely occluded tubules were seen in BioMin F + laser group followed by Propolis + laser, Biomin F, and Propolis. CONCLUSION: Combination approach of desensitizing agent and laser provided a better result than the desensitizing agent alone and when compared individually Biomin F was more effective desensitizer as compared to Propolis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10153734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101537342023-05-03 A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study Khare, Komal Bhusari, Prashant Soni, Abhishek Malagi, Sachin K. Abraham, Dennis Johnson, Lynn J Microsc Ultrastruct Original Article INTRODUCTION: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can provide only temporary and unpredictable desensitization. Therefore, new treatment methods that are effective for long periods and at the same time do not have the complications are needed. Recently, two new desensitizing agents BioMin F and Propolis have been introduced for the treatment of DH. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without the use of an adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five freshly extracted teeth were taken out of which thirty were sectioned into halves and divided into four test groups BioMin F, Propolis, BioMin F + Laser, and Propolis + Laser and control group. All the specimens were treated twice a day for 7 days and then evaluated under scanning electron microscope for partial and complete dentinal tubule occlusion. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of completely occluded tubules were seen in BioMin F + laser group followed by Propolis + laser, Biomin F, and Propolis. CONCLUSION: Combination approach of desensitizing agent and laser provided a better result than the desensitizing agent alone and when compared individually Biomin F was more effective desensitizer as compared to Propolis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10153734/ /pubmed/37144169 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khare, Komal Bhusari, Prashant Soni, Abhishek Malagi, Sachin K. Abraham, Dennis Johnson, Lynn A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of efficacy of biomin f and propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without use of an adjunct 810 nm diode laser: an in vitro scanning electron microscope study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144169 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kharekomal acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT bhusariprashant acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT soniabhishek acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT malagisachink acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT abrahamdennis acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT johnsonlynn acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT kharekomal comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT bhusariprashant comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT soniabhishek comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT malagisachink comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT abrahamdennis comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy AT johnsonlynn comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy |