Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study

INTRODUCTION: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khare, Komal, Bhusari, Prashant, Soni, Abhishek, Malagi, Sachin K., Abraham, Dennis, Johnson, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144169
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20
_version_ 1785035980945752064
author Khare, Komal
Bhusari, Prashant
Soni, Abhishek
Malagi, Sachin K.
Abraham, Dennis
Johnson, Lynn
author_facet Khare, Komal
Bhusari, Prashant
Soni, Abhishek
Malagi, Sachin K.
Abraham, Dennis
Johnson, Lynn
author_sort Khare, Komal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can provide only temporary and unpredictable desensitization. Therefore, new treatment methods that are effective for long periods and at the same time do not have the complications are needed. Recently, two new desensitizing agents BioMin F and Propolis have been introduced for the treatment of DH. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without the use of an adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five freshly extracted teeth were taken out of which thirty were sectioned into halves and divided into four test groups BioMin F, Propolis, BioMin F + Laser, and Propolis + Laser and control group. All the specimens were treated twice a day for 7 days and then evaluated under scanning electron microscope for partial and complete dentinal tubule occlusion. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of completely occluded tubules were seen in BioMin F + laser group followed by Propolis + laser, Biomin F, and Propolis. CONCLUSION: Combination approach of desensitizing agent and laser provided a better result than the desensitizing agent alone and when compared individually Biomin F was more effective desensitizer as compared to Propolis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10153734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101537342023-05-03 A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study Khare, Komal Bhusari, Prashant Soni, Abhishek Malagi, Sachin K. Abraham, Dennis Johnson, Lynn J Microsc Ultrastruct Original Article INTRODUCTION: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can provide only temporary and unpredictable desensitization. Therefore, new treatment methods that are effective for long periods and at the same time do not have the complications are needed. Recently, two new desensitizing agents BioMin F and Propolis have been introduced for the treatment of DH. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without the use of an adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five freshly extracted teeth were taken out of which thirty were sectioned into halves and divided into four test groups BioMin F, Propolis, BioMin F + Laser, and Propolis + Laser and control group. All the specimens were treated twice a day for 7 days and then evaluated under scanning electron microscope for partial and complete dentinal tubule occlusion. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of completely occluded tubules were seen in BioMin F + laser group followed by Propolis + laser, Biomin F, and Propolis. CONCLUSION: Combination approach of desensitizing agent and laser provided a better result than the desensitizing agent alone and when compared individually Biomin F was more effective desensitizer as compared to Propolis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10153734/ /pubmed/37144169 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khare, Komal
Bhusari, Prashant
Soni, Abhishek
Malagi, Sachin K.
Abraham, Dennis
Johnson, Lynn
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy of biomin f and propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without use of an adjunct 810 nm diode laser: an in vitro scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144169
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kharekomal acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT bhusariprashant acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT soniabhishek acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT malagisachink acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT abrahamdennis acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT johnsonlynn acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT kharekomal comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT bhusariprashant comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT soniabhishek comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT malagisachink comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT abrahamdennis comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT johnsonlynn comparativeevaluationofefficacyofbiominfandpropoliscontainingtoothpastesondentinaltubuleocclusionwithandwithoutuseofanadjunct810nmdiodelaseraninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy