Cargando…

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of endodontically treated maxillary premolar teeth restored with different direct composite restorative techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty freshly extracted maxillary premolar teeth with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdulamir, Shahed Wissam, Majeed, Manhal A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6159338
_version_ 1785036056639307776
author Abdulamir, Shahed Wissam
Majeed, Manhal A.
author_facet Abdulamir, Shahed Wissam
Majeed, Manhal A.
author_sort Abdulamir, Shahed Wissam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of endodontically treated maxillary premolar teeth restored with different direct composite restorative techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty freshly extracted maxillary premolar teeth with comparable sizes were used in this in vitro study. Each tooth received mesio-occluso-distal cavity preparation (3 mm width and 6 mm depth) followed by endodontic treatment. Canals were instrumented with RACE EVO rotary files (FKG, Dentaire, Switzerland) up to MAF 25/.06. Canals were obturated using a single cone technique, then the teeth were divided arbitrarily into five groups (n = 8): Group A: direct composite resin only using a centripetal technique, Group B: direct composite resin with glass fiber post, Group C: direct composite resin with short fiber-reinforced composite (everX Flow), Group D: direct composite resin with leno wave ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (LWUHMWPE) fibers placed on cavity floor, and Group E: direct composite resin with LWUHMWPE fibers placed circumferentially around the cavity walls (wallpapering technique). The teeth were then stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hr. The fracture resistance of each sample was measured using a universal testing machine in Newton (N). The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Group E recorded the maximum mean of fracture load (2,139.375 N), while Group A recorded the minimum mean of fracture load (689.6250 N). The one-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference between the groups. The Bonferroni test showed a significant difference between each two groups, with the exception of those between Groups B and C and between Groups D and E, where there were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Restoration of endodontically treated teeth using the wallpapering technique recorded the highest mean of fracture resistance with a repairable mode of fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101541042023-05-03 Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study Abdulamir, Shahed Wissam Majeed, Manhal A. Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of endodontically treated maxillary premolar teeth restored with different direct composite restorative techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty freshly extracted maxillary premolar teeth with comparable sizes were used in this in vitro study. Each tooth received mesio-occluso-distal cavity preparation (3 mm width and 6 mm depth) followed by endodontic treatment. Canals were instrumented with RACE EVO rotary files (FKG, Dentaire, Switzerland) up to MAF 25/.06. Canals were obturated using a single cone technique, then the teeth were divided arbitrarily into five groups (n = 8): Group A: direct composite resin only using a centripetal technique, Group B: direct composite resin with glass fiber post, Group C: direct composite resin with short fiber-reinforced composite (everX Flow), Group D: direct composite resin with leno wave ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (LWUHMWPE) fibers placed on cavity floor, and Group E: direct composite resin with LWUHMWPE fibers placed circumferentially around the cavity walls (wallpapering technique). The teeth were then stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hr. The fracture resistance of each sample was measured using a universal testing machine in Newton (N). The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Group E recorded the maximum mean of fracture load (2,139.375 N), while Group A recorded the minimum mean of fracture load (689.6250 N). The one-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference between the groups. The Bonferroni test showed a significant difference between each two groups, with the exception of those between Groups B and C and between Groups D and E, where there were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Restoration of endodontically treated teeth using the wallpapering technique recorded the highest mean of fracture resistance with a repairable mode of fracture. Hindawi 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10154104/ /pubmed/37143851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6159338 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shahed Wissam Abdulamir and Manhal A. Majeed. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdulamir, Shahed Wissam
Majeed, Manhal A.
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_full Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_short Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_sort fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolar teeth restored with wallpapering technique: a comparative in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6159338
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulamirshahedwissam fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarteethrestoredwithwallpaperingtechniqueacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT majeedmanhala fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarteethrestoredwithwallpaperingtechniqueacomparativeinvitrostudy