Cargando…

Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciocca, Leonardo, Maltauro, Mattia, Pierantozzi, Elena, Breschi, Lorenzo, Montanari, Angela, Anderlucci, Laura, Meneghello, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153006
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55
_version_ 1785036066189737984
author Ciocca, Leonardo
Maltauro, Mattia
Pierantozzi, Elena
Breschi, Lorenzo
Montanari, Angela
Anderlucci, Laura
Meneghello, Roberto
author_facet Ciocca, Leonardo
Maltauro, Mattia
Pierantozzi, Elena
Breschi, Lorenzo
Montanari, Angela
Anderlucci, Laura
Meneghello, Roberto
author_sort Ciocca, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the Δ-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained Δ-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group. RESULTS: The Δ-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson’s Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group. CONCLUSION: All Δ-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101541452023-05-04 Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials Ciocca, Leonardo Maltauro, Mattia Pierantozzi, Elena Breschi, Lorenzo Montanari, Angela Anderlucci, Laura Meneghello, Roberto J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the Δ-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained Δ-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group. RESULTS: The Δ-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson’s Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group. CONCLUSION: All Δ-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2023-04 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10154145/ /pubmed/37153006 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55 Text en © 2023 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ciocca, Leonardo
Maltauro, Mattia
Pierantozzi, Elena
Breschi, Lorenzo
Montanari, Angela
Anderlucci, Laura
Meneghello, Roberto
Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
title Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
title_full Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
title_fullStr Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
title_short Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
title_sort evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153006
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55
work_keys_str_mv AT cioccaleonardo evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials
AT maltauromattia evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials
AT pierantozzielena evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials
AT breschilorenzo evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials
AT montanariangela evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials
AT anderluccilaura evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials
AT meneghelloroberto evaluationoftruenessandprecisionofremovablepartialdenturemetalframeworksmanufacturedwithdigitaltechnologyanddifferentmaterials