Cargando…

Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector

In the present study, by adding graphene to a photoconductive photodetector with a niobium pentoxide (Nb(2)O(5)) absorber layer and exploiting the photogating effect, the responsivity of the photodetector is significantly improved. In this photodetector, the Nb(2)O(5) layer detects the light, and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeghi Neisiani, Zahra, Khaje, Mahdi, Eslami Majd, Abdollah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37130919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34295-5
_version_ 1785036117525921792
author Sadeghi Neisiani, Zahra
Khaje, Mahdi
Eslami Majd, Abdollah
author_facet Sadeghi Neisiani, Zahra
Khaje, Mahdi
Eslami Majd, Abdollah
author_sort Sadeghi Neisiani, Zahra
collection PubMed
description In the present study, by adding graphene to a photoconductive photodetector with a niobium pentoxide (Nb(2)O(5)) absorber layer and exploiting the photogating effect, the responsivity of the photodetector is significantly improved. In this photodetector, the Nb(2)O(5) layer detects the light, and the graphene improves the responsivity based on the photogating effect. The photocurrent and the percentage ratio of the photocurrent to dark current of the Nb(2)O(5) photogating photodetector are compared with those of the corresponding photoconductive photodetector. Also, the Nb(2)O(5) photoconductive and photogating photodetectors are compared with titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) photoconductive and photogating photodetectors in terms of responsivity at different applied (drain-source) voltages and gate voltages. The results show that the Nb(2)O(5) photodetectors have better figures of merit (FOMs) in comparison with the TiO(2) ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101543932023-05-04 Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector Sadeghi Neisiani, Zahra Khaje, Mahdi Eslami Majd, Abdollah Sci Rep Article In the present study, by adding graphene to a photoconductive photodetector with a niobium pentoxide (Nb(2)O(5)) absorber layer and exploiting the photogating effect, the responsivity of the photodetector is significantly improved. In this photodetector, the Nb(2)O(5) layer detects the light, and the graphene improves the responsivity based on the photogating effect. The photocurrent and the percentage ratio of the photocurrent to dark current of the Nb(2)O(5) photogating photodetector are compared with those of the corresponding photoconductive photodetector. Also, the Nb(2)O(5) photoconductive and photogating photodetectors are compared with titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) photoconductive and photogating photodetectors in terms of responsivity at different applied (drain-source) voltages and gate voltages. The results show that the Nb(2)O(5) photodetectors have better figures of merit (FOMs) in comparison with the TiO(2) ones. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10154393/ /pubmed/37130919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34295-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sadeghi Neisiani, Zahra
Khaje, Mahdi
Eslami Majd, Abdollah
Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector
title Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector
title_full Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector
title_fullStr Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector
title_full_unstemmed Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector
title_short Experimental comparison between Nb(2)O(5)- and TiO(2)-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector
title_sort experimental comparison between nb(2)o(5)- and tio(2)-based photoconductive and photogating gfet uv detector
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37130919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34295-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghineisianizahra experimentalcomparisonbetweennb2o5andtio2basedphotoconductiveandphotogatinggfetuvdetector
AT khajemahdi experimentalcomparisonbetweennb2o5andtio2basedphotoconductiveandphotogatinggfetuvdetector
AT eslamimajdabdollah experimentalcomparisonbetweennb2o5andtio2basedphotoconductiveandphotogatinggfetuvdetector