Cargando…
A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection
The purpose of this retrospective, longitudinal study is to evaluate the relationship between MD slope from visual field tests collected over a short period of time (2 years) and the current United States’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended endpoints for visual field outcomes. If this co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37130950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34009-x |
_version_ | 1785036121125683200 |
---|---|
author | De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo Lane, Keith J. Wang, Xiao Liebmann, Jeffrey M. |
author_facet | De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo Lane, Keith J. Wang, Xiao Liebmann, Jeffrey M. |
author_sort | De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this retrospective, longitudinal study is to evaluate the relationship between MD slope from visual field tests collected over a short period of time (2 years) and the current United States’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended endpoints for visual field outcomes. If this correlation is strong and highly predictive, clinical trials employing MD slopes as primary endpoints could be employed in neuroprotection clinical trials with shorter duration and help expedite the development of novel IOP-independent therapies. Visual field tests of patients with or suspected glaucoma were selected from an academic institution and evaluated based on two functional progression endpoints: (A) five or more locations worsening by at least 7 dB, and (B) at least five test locations based upon the GCP algorithm. A total of 271 (57.6%) and 278 (59.1%) eyes reached Endpoints A and B, respectively during the follow up period. The median (IQR) MD slope of eyes reaching vs. not reaching Endpoint A and B were −1.19 (−2.00 to −0.41) vs. 0.36 (0.00 to 1.00) dB/year and −1.16 (−1.98 to −0.40) vs. 0.41 (0.02 to 1.03) dB/year, respectively (P < 0.001). It was found that eyes experiencing rapid 24-2 visual field MD slopes over a 2-year period were on average tenfold more likely to reach one of the FDA accepted endpoints during or soon after that period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10154412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101544122023-05-04 A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo Lane, Keith J. Wang, Xiao Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Sci Rep Article The purpose of this retrospective, longitudinal study is to evaluate the relationship between MD slope from visual field tests collected over a short period of time (2 years) and the current United States’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended endpoints for visual field outcomes. If this correlation is strong and highly predictive, clinical trials employing MD slopes as primary endpoints could be employed in neuroprotection clinical trials with shorter duration and help expedite the development of novel IOP-independent therapies. Visual field tests of patients with or suspected glaucoma were selected from an academic institution and evaluated based on two functional progression endpoints: (A) five or more locations worsening by at least 7 dB, and (B) at least five test locations based upon the GCP algorithm. A total of 271 (57.6%) and 278 (59.1%) eyes reached Endpoints A and B, respectively during the follow up period. The median (IQR) MD slope of eyes reaching vs. not reaching Endpoint A and B were −1.19 (−2.00 to −0.41) vs. 0.36 (0.00 to 1.00) dB/year and −1.16 (−1.98 to −0.40) vs. 0.41 (0.02 to 1.03) dB/year, respectively (P < 0.001). It was found that eyes experiencing rapid 24-2 visual field MD slopes over a 2-year period were on average tenfold more likely to reach one of the FDA accepted endpoints during or soon after that period. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10154412/ /pubmed/37130950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34009-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo Lane, Keith J. Wang, Xiao Liebmann, Jeffrey M. A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
title | A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
title_full | A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
title_fullStr | A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
title_full_unstemmed | A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
title_short | A potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
title_sort | potential primary endpoint for clinical trials in glaucoma neuroprotection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37130950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34009-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demoraescarlosgustavo apotentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT lanekeithj apotentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT wangxiao apotentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT liebmannjeffreym apotentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT demoraescarlosgustavo potentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT lanekeithj potentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT wangxiao potentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection AT liebmannjeffreym potentialprimaryendpointforclinicaltrialsinglaucomaneuroprotection |