Cargando…

A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the application of modified region-of-interest (ROI) segmentation method in unenhanced computed tomography in the radiomics model of adrenal lipid-poor adenoma, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance using an external medical institution data set and se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Hanlin, Wu, Mengwei, Wei, Peiying, Tian, Min, Zhang, Tong, Hu, Chunfeng, Han, Zhijiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1086039
_version_ 1785036126840422400
author Zhu, Hanlin
Wu, Mengwei
Wei, Peiying
Tian, Min
Zhang, Tong
Hu, Chunfeng
Han, Zhijiang
author_facet Zhu, Hanlin
Wu, Mengwei
Wei, Peiying
Tian, Min
Zhang, Tong
Hu, Chunfeng
Han, Zhijiang
author_sort Zhu, Hanlin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the application of modified region-of-interest (ROI) segmentation method in unenhanced computed tomography in the radiomics model of adrenal lipid-poor adenoma, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance using an external medical institution data set and select the best ROI segmentation method. METHODS: The imaging data of 135 lipid-poor adenomas and 102 non-adenomas in medical institution A and 30 lipid-poor adenomas and 43 non-adenomas in medical institution B were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases were pathologically or clinically confirmed. The data of Institution A builds the model, and the data of Institution B verifies the diagnostic performance of the model. Semi-automated ROI segmentation of tumors was performed using uAI software, using maximum area single-slice method (MAX) and full-volume method (ALL), as well as modified single-slice method (MAX_E) and full-volume method (ALL_E) to segment tumors, respectively. The inter-rater correlation coefficients (ICC) was performed to assess the stability of the radiomics features of the four ROI segmentation methods. The area under the curve (AUC) and at least 95% specificity pAUC (Partial AUC) were used as measures of the diagnostic performance of the model. RESULTS: A total of 104 unfiltered radiomics features were extracted using each of the four segmentation methods. In the ROC analysis of the radiomics model, the AUC value of the model constructed by MAX was 0.925, 0.919, and 0.898 on the training set, the internal validation set, and the external validation set, respectively, and the AUC value of MAX_E was 0.937, 0.931, and 0.906, respectively. The AUC value of ALL was 0.929, 0.929, and 0.918, and the AUC value of ALL_E was 0.942, 0.926, and 0.927, respectively. In all samples, the pAUCs of MAX, MAX_E, ALL, and ALL_E were 0.021, 0.025, 0.018, and 0.028, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of the radiomics model constructed based on the full-volume method was better than that of the model based on the single-slice method. The model constructed using the ALL_E method had a stronger generalization ability and the highest AUC and pAUC value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101544612023-05-04 A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study Zhu, Hanlin Wu, Mengwei Wei, Peiying Tian, Min Zhang, Tong Hu, Chunfeng Han, Zhijiang Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the application of modified region-of-interest (ROI) segmentation method in unenhanced computed tomography in the radiomics model of adrenal lipid-poor adenoma, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance using an external medical institution data set and select the best ROI segmentation method. METHODS: The imaging data of 135 lipid-poor adenomas and 102 non-adenomas in medical institution A and 30 lipid-poor adenomas and 43 non-adenomas in medical institution B were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases were pathologically or clinically confirmed. The data of Institution A builds the model, and the data of Institution B verifies the diagnostic performance of the model. Semi-automated ROI segmentation of tumors was performed using uAI software, using maximum area single-slice method (MAX) and full-volume method (ALL), as well as modified single-slice method (MAX_E) and full-volume method (ALL_E) to segment tumors, respectively. The inter-rater correlation coefficients (ICC) was performed to assess the stability of the radiomics features of the four ROI segmentation methods. The area under the curve (AUC) and at least 95% specificity pAUC (Partial AUC) were used as measures of the diagnostic performance of the model. RESULTS: A total of 104 unfiltered radiomics features were extracted using each of the four segmentation methods. In the ROC analysis of the radiomics model, the AUC value of the model constructed by MAX was 0.925, 0.919, and 0.898 on the training set, the internal validation set, and the external validation set, respectively, and the AUC value of MAX_E was 0.937, 0.931, and 0.906, respectively. The AUC value of ALL was 0.929, 0.929, and 0.918, and the AUC value of ALL_E was 0.942, 0.926, and 0.927, respectively. In all samples, the pAUCs of MAX, MAX_E, ALL, and ALL_E were 0.021, 0.025, 0.018, and 0.028, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of the radiomics model constructed based on the full-volume method was better than that of the model based on the single-slice method. The model constructed using the ALL_E method had a stronger generalization ability and the highest AUC and pAUC value. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10154461/ /pubmed/37152026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1086039 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhu, Wu, Wei, Tian, Zhang, Hu and Han https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhu, Hanlin
Wu, Mengwei
Wei, Peiying
Tian, Min
Zhang, Tong
Hu, Chunfeng
Han, Zhijiang
A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
title A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
title_full A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
title_fullStr A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
title_full_unstemmed A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
title_short A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
title_sort modified method for ct radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1086039
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuhanlin amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT wumengwei amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT weipeiying amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT tianmin amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT zhangtong amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT huchunfeng amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT hanzhijiang amodifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT zhuhanlin modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT wumengwei modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT weipeiying modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT tianmin modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT zhangtong modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT huchunfeng modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy
AT hanzhijiang modifiedmethodforctradiomicsregionofinterestsegmentationinadrenallipidpooradenomasatwoinstitutioncomparativestudy