Cargando…

Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy

BACKGROUND: At present, minimally invasive radical esophagectomy is the main surgical method for esophageal cancer treatment, but it has inherent limitations. We have developed a novel method of radical esophagectomy without thoracotomy to improve this situation, namely, by using EMLE. We evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Weidong, Cui, Dong, Shi, Kefeng, Chen, Maolin, Zhang, Binbin, Qian, Rulin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1110962
_version_ 1785036167115177984
author Zhang, Weidong
Cui, Dong
Shi, Kefeng
Chen, Maolin
Zhang, Binbin
Qian, Rulin
author_facet Zhang, Weidong
Cui, Dong
Shi, Kefeng
Chen, Maolin
Zhang, Binbin
Qian, Rulin
author_sort Zhang, Weidong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At present, minimally invasive radical esophagectomy is the main surgical method for esophageal cancer treatment, but it has inherent limitations. We have developed a novel method of radical esophagectomy without thoracotomy to improve this situation, namely, by using EMLE. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy (EMLE) through a retrospective analysis. METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2022, we successfully performed 106 cases of radical resection of esophageal cancer with this new surgical technique, gradually improved the surgical path, and recorded the perioperative data and postoperative complications of all patients. RESULTS: The operation was successfully performed in all patients except for two patients who required a switch to open surgery. The mean operation time was 171.11 ± 33.29 min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 93.53 ± 56.32 ml. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 23.59 ± 5.42. The postoperative complications included pneumonia (3.77%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (1.89%), anastomotic leak (14.15%), pleural effusion (5.66%), chylothorax (2.83%), and reoperation (4.72%). All complications were graded I–III per the Clavien–Dindo classification. No perioperative death was recorded. CONCLUSION: Expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy is feasible for radical resection of esophageal cancer, with good therapeutic effect and safety. Because of its minimal impact on patients and convenient operation, it is a novel surgical option for patients with esophageal cancer and is expected to become a standard surgical method for radical esophagectomy in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101546272023-05-04 Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy Zhang, Weidong Cui, Dong Shi, Kefeng Chen, Maolin Zhang, Binbin Qian, Rulin Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: At present, minimally invasive radical esophagectomy is the main surgical method for esophageal cancer treatment, but it has inherent limitations. We have developed a novel method of radical esophagectomy without thoracotomy to improve this situation, namely, by using EMLE. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy (EMLE) through a retrospective analysis. METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2022, we successfully performed 106 cases of radical resection of esophageal cancer with this new surgical technique, gradually improved the surgical path, and recorded the perioperative data and postoperative complications of all patients. RESULTS: The operation was successfully performed in all patients except for two patients who required a switch to open surgery. The mean operation time was 171.11 ± 33.29 min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 93.53 ± 56.32 ml. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 23.59 ± 5.42. The postoperative complications included pneumonia (3.77%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (1.89%), anastomotic leak (14.15%), pleural effusion (5.66%), chylothorax (2.83%), and reoperation (4.72%). All complications were graded I–III per the Clavien–Dindo classification. No perioperative death was recorded. CONCLUSION: Expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy is feasible for radical resection of esophageal cancer, with good therapeutic effect and safety. Because of its minimal impact on patients and convenient operation, it is a novel surgical option for patients with esophageal cancer and is expected to become a standard surgical method for radical esophagectomy in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10154627/ /pubmed/37152019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1110962 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Cui, Shi, Chen, Zhang and Qian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Weidong
Cui, Dong
Shi, Kefeng
Chen, Maolin
Zhang, Binbin
Qian, Rulin
Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
title Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
title_full Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
title_fullStr Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
title_short Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
title_sort feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1110962
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangweidong feasibilityandsafetyofexpandablemediastinoscopicandlaparoscopicradicalesophagectomy
AT cuidong feasibilityandsafetyofexpandablemediastinoscopicandlaparoscopicradicalesophagectomy
AT shikefeng feasibilityandsafetyofexpandablemediastinoscopicandlaparoscopicradicalesophagectomy
AT chenmaolin feasibilityandsafetyofexpandablemediastinoscopicandlaparoscopicradicalesophagectomy
AT zhangbinbin feasibilityandsafetyofexpandablemediastinoscopicandlaparoscopicradicalesophagectomy
AT qianrulin feasibilityandsafetyofexpandablemediastinoscopicandlaparoscopicradicalesophagectomy