Cargando…

Once-Weekly Basal Insulin Fc Demonstrated Similar Glycemic Control to Once-Daily Insulin Degludec in Insulin-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 2 Randomized Control Trial

OBJECTIVE: Basal insulin Fc (BIF) (insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed the safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bue-Valleskey, Juliana M., Kazda, Christof M., Ma, Chenchen, Chien, Jenny, Zhang, Qianyi, Chigutsa, Emmanuel, Landschulz, William, Haupt, Axel, Frias, Juan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944059
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc22-2396
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Basal insulin Fc (BIF) (insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed the safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) previously treated with oral antihyperglycemic medications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During this randomized, parallel, open-label study, 278 insulin-naive patients with T2D were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive BIF once weekly or degludec once daily over the 26-week treatment period. Both groups were titrated to fasting glucose of 80–100 mg/dL (4.4 to <5.6 mmol/L). The primary end point was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin 0.4%). Secondary end points included fasting blood glucose (FBG), six-point glucose profiles, and rate of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: After 26 weeks of treatment, BIF demonstrated a noninferior HbA(1c) change from baseline versus degludec, with a treatment difference of 0.06% (90% CI −0.11, 0.24; P = 0.56). Both BIF and degludec treatment led to significant reductions in FBG from baseline. At week 26, the between-treatment difference for BIF versus degludec was 4.7 mg/dL (90% CI 0.1, 9.3; P = 0.09). The rate of level 2 hypoglycemia was low and not significantly different between treatment groups (BIF 0.22 events/patient/year, degludec 0.15 events/patient/year; P = 0.64); there was no severe hypoglycemia. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events was also similar between BIF and degludec. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly BIF achieved excellent glycemic control similar to degludec, with no concerning hypoglycemia or other safety findings.