Cargando…
Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214 |
_version_ | 1785036182547070976 |
---|---|
author | Wykes, Til Stringer, Dominic Boadu, Janette Tinch-Taylor, Rose Csipke, Emese Cella, Matteo Pickles, Andrew McCrone, Paul Reeder, Clare Birchwood, Max Fowler, David Greenwood, Kathryn Johnson, Sonia Perez, Jesus Ritunnano, Rosa Thompson, Andrew Upthegrove, Rachel Wilson, Jon Kenny, Alex Isok, Iris Joyce, Eileen M |
author_facet | Wykes, Til Stringer, Dominic Boadu, Janette Tinch-Taylor, Rose Csipke, Emese Cella, Matteo Pickles, Andrew McCrone, Paul Reeder, Clare Birchwood, Max Fowler, David Greenwood, Kathryn Johnson, Sonia Perez, Jesus Ritunnano, Rosa Thompson, Andrew Upthegrove, Rachel Wilson, Jon Kenny, Alex Isok, Iris Joyce, Eileen M |
author_sort | Wykes, Til |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of therapist-supported CR. Participants from 11 NHS early intervention psychosis services were independently randomized to Independent, Group, One-to-One, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional recovery (Goal Attainment Scale [GAS]) at 15-weeks post randomization. Independent and TAU arms were closed after an interim analysis, and three informative contrasts tested (Group vs One-to-One, Independent vs TAU, Group + One-to-One vs TAU). Health economic analyses considered the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). All analyses used intention-to-treat principles. STUDY RESULTS: We analyzed 377 participants (65 Independent, 134 Group, 112 One-to-One, 66 TAU). GAS did not differ for Group vs One-to-One: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.25 to 0.40 95% CI, P = .655; Independent vs TAU: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.41 to 0.55 95% CI, P = .777. GAS and the cognitive score improved for Group + One-to-One vs TAU favoring CR (GAS: Cohen’s d: 0.57, 0.19–0.96 95% CI, P = .003; Cognitive score: Cohens d: 0.28, 0.07–0.48 95% CI, P = .008). The QALY costs were £4306 for Group vs TAU and £3170 for One-to-One vs TAU. Adverse events did not differ between treatment methods and no serious adverse events were related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both active therapist methods provided cost-effective treatment benefiting functional recovery in early psychosis and should be adopted within services. Some individuals benefited more than others so needs further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860Now closed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10154711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101547112023-05-04 Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants Wykes, Til Stringer, Dominic Boadu, Janette Tinch-Taylor, Rose Csipke, Emese Cella, Matteo Pickles, Andrew McCrone, Paul Reeder, Clare Birchwood, Max Fowler, David Greenwood, Kathryn Johnson, Sonia Perez, Jesus Ritunnano, Rosa Thompson, Andrew Upthegrove, Rachel Wilson, Jon Kenny, Alex Isok, Iris Joyce, Eileen M Schizophr Bull Regular Articles BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of therapist-supported CR. Participants from 11 NHS early intervention psychosis services were independently randomized to Independent, Group, One-to-One, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional recovery (Goal Attainment Scale [GAS]) at 15-weeks post randomization. Independent and TAU arms were closed after an interim analysis, and three informative contrasts tested (Group vs One-to-One, Independent vs TAU, Group + One-to-One vs TAU). Health economic analyses considered the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). All analyses used intention-to-treat principles. STUDY RESULTS: We analyzed 377 participants (65 Independent, 134 Group, 112 One-to-One, 66 TAU). GAS did not differ for Group vs One-to-One: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.25 to 0.40 95% CI, P = .655; Independent vs TAU: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.41 to 0.55 95% CI, P = .777. GAS and the cognitive score improved for Group + One-to-One vs TAU favoring CR (GAS: Cohen’s d: 0.57, 0.19–0.96 95% CI, P = .003; Cognitive score: Cohens d: 0.28, 0.07–0.48 95% CI, P = .008). The QALY costs were £4306 for Group vs TAU and £3170 for One-to-One vs TAU. Adverse events did not differ between treatment methods and no serious adverse events were related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both active therapist methods provided cost-effective treatment benefiting functional recovery in early psychosis and should be adopted within services. Some individuals benefited more than others so needs further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860Now closed. Oxford University Press 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10154711/ /pubmed/36869733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Wykes, Til Stringer, Dominic Boadu, Janette Tinch-Taylor, Rose Csipke, Emese Cella, Matteo Pickles, Andrew McCrone, Paul Reeder, Clare Birchwood, Max Fowler, David Greenwood, Kathryn Johnson, Sonia Perez, Jesus Ritunnano, Rosa Thompson, Andrew Upthegrove, Rachel Wilson, Jon Kenny, Alex Isok, Iris Joyce, Eileen M Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants |
title | Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants |
title_full | Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants |
title_short | Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants |
title_sort | cognitive remediation works but how should we provide it? an adaptive randomized controlled trial of delivery methods using a patient nominated recovery outcome in first-episode participants |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wykestil cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT stringerdominic cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT boadujanette cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT tinchtaylorrose cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT csipkeemese cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT cellamatteo cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT picklesandrew cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT mccronepaul cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT reederclare cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT birchwoodmax cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT fowlerdavid cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT greenwoodkathryn cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT johnsonsonia cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT perezjesus cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT ritunnanorosa cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT thompsonandrew cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT upthegroverachel cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT wilsonjon cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT kennyalex cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT isokiris cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants AT joyceeileenm cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants |