Cargando…

Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wykes, Til, Stringer, Dominic, Boadu, Janette, Tinch-Taylor, Rose, Csipke, Emese, Cella, Matteo, Pickles, Andrew, McCrone, Paul, Reeder, Clare, Birchwood, Max, Fowler, David, Greenwood, Kathryn, Johnson, Sonia, Perez, Jesus, Ritunnano, Rosa, Thompson, Andrew, Upthegrove, Rachel, Wilson, Jon, Kenny, Alex, Isok, Iris, Joyce, Eileen M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214
_version_ 1785036182547070976
author Wykes, Til
Stringer, Dominic
Boadu, Janette
Tinch-Taylor, Rose
Csipke, Emese
Cella, Matteo
Pickles, Andrew
McCrone, Paul
Reeder, Clare
Birchwood, Max
Fowler, David
Greenwood, Kathryn
Johnson, Sonia
Perez, Jesus
Ritunnano, Rosa
Thompson, Andrew
Upthegrove, Rachel
Wilson, Jon
Kenny, Alex
Isok, Iris
Joyce, Eileen M
author_facet Wykes, Til
Stringer, Dominic
Boadu, Janette
Tinch-Taylor, Rose
Csipke, Emese
Cella, Matteo
Pickles, Andrew
McCrone, Paul
Reeder, Clare
Birchwood, Max
Fowler, David
Greenwood, Kathryn
Johnson, Sonia
Perez, Jesus
Ritunnano, Rosa
Thompson, Andrew
Upthegrove, Rachel
Wilson, Jon
Kenny, Alex
Isok, Iris
Joyce, Eileen M
author_sort Wykes, Til
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of therapist-supported CR. Participants from 11 NHS early intervention psychosis services were independently randomized to Independent, Group, One-to-One, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional recovery (Goal Attainment Scale [GAS]) at 15-weeks post randomization. Independent and TAU arms were closed after an interim analysis, and three informative contrasts tested (Group vs One-to-One, Independent vs TAU, Group + One-to-One vs TAU). Health economic analyses considered the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). All analyses used intention-to-treat principles. STUDY RESULTS: We analyzed 377 participants (65 Independent, 134 Group, 112 One-to-One, 66 TAU). GAS did not differ for Group vs One-to-One: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.25 to 0.40 95% CI, P = .655; Independent vs TAU: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.41 to 0.55 95% CI, P = .777. GAS and the cognitive score improved for Group + One-to-One vs TAU favoring CR (GAS: Cohen’s d: 0.57, 0.19–0.96 95% CI, P = .003; Cognitive score: Cohens d: 0.28, 0.07–0.48 95% CI, P = .008). The QALY costs were £4306 for Group vs TAU and £3170 for One-to-One vs TAU. Adverse events did not differ between treatment methods and no serious adverse events were related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both active therapist methods provided cost-effective treatment benefiting functional recovery in early psychosis and should be adopted within services. Some individuals benefited more than others so needs further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860Now closed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101547112023-05-04 Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants Wykes, Til Stringer, Dominic Boadu, Janette Tinch-Taylor, Rose Csipke, Emese Cella, Matteo Pickles, Andrew McCrone, Paul Reeder, Clare Birchwood, Max Fowler, David Greenwood, Kathryn Johnson, Sonia Perez, Jesus Ritunnano, Rosa Thompson, Andrew Upthegrove, Rachel Wilson, Jon Kenny, Alex Isok, Iris Joyce, Eileen M Schizophr Bull Regular Articles BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of therapist-supported CR. Participants from 11 NHS early intervention psychosis services were independently randomized to Independent, Group, One-to-One, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional recovery (Goal Attainment Scale [GAS]) at 15-weeks post randomization. Independent and TAU arms were closed after an interim analysis, and three informative contrasts tested (Group vs One-to-One, Independent vs TAU, Group + One-to-One vs TAU). Health economic analyses considered the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). All analyses used intention-to-treat principles. STUDY RESULTS: We analyzed 377 participants (65 Independent, 134 Group, 112 One-to-One, 66 TAU). GAS did not differ for Group vs One-to-One: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.25 to 0.40 95% CI, P = .655; Independent vs TAU: Cohen’s d: 0.07, −0.41 to 0.55 95% CI, P = .777. GAS and the cognitive score improved for Group + One-to-One vs TAU favoring CR (GAS: Cohen’s d: 0.57, 0.19–0.96 95% CI, P = .003; Cognitive score: Cohens d: 0.28, 0.07–0.48 95% CI, P = .008). The QALY costs were £4306 for Group vs TAU and £3170 for One-to-One vs TAU. Adverse events did not differ between treatment methods and no serious adverse events were related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both active therapist methods provided cost-effective treatment benefiting functional recovery in early psychosis and should be adopted within services. Some individuals benefited more than others so needs further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860Now closed. Oxford University Press 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10154711/ /pubmed/36869733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Wykes, Til
Stringer, Dominic
Boadu, Janette
Tinch-Taylor, Rose
Csipke, Emese
Cella, Matteo
Pickles, Andrew
McCrone, Paul
Reeder, Clare
Birchwood, Max
Fowler, David
Greenwood, Kathryn
Johnson, Sonia
Perez, Jesus
Ritunnano, Rosa
Thompson, Andrew
Upthegrove, Rachel
Wilson, Jon
Kenny, Alex
Isok, Iris
Joyce, Eileen M
Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
title Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
title_full Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
title_fullStr Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
title_short Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants
title_sort cognitive remediation works but how should we provide it? an adaptive randomized controlled trial of delivery methods using a patient nominated recovery outcome in first-episode participants
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214
work_keys_str_mv AT wykestil cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT stringerdominic cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT boadujanette cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT tinchtaylorrose cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT csipkeemese cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT cellamatteo cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT picklesandrew cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT mccronepaul cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT reederclare cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT birchwoodmax cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT fowlerdavid cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT greenwoodkathryn cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT johnsonsonia cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT perezjesus cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT ritunnanorosa cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT thompsonandrew cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT upthegroverachel cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT wilsonjon cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT kennyalex cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT isokiris cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants
AT joyceeileenm cognitiveremediationworksbuthowshouldweprovideitanadaptiverandomizedcontrolledtrialofdeliverymethodsusingapatientnominatedrecoveryoutcomeinfirstepisodeparticipants