Cargando…
Acceptability of risk stratification within population‐based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed‐methods systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Risk‐stratified cancer screening has the potential to improve resource allocation and the balance of harms and benefits by targeting those most likely to benefit. Public acceptability has implications for engagement, uptake and the success of such a programme. Therefore, this review se...
Autores principales: | Taylor, Lily C., Hutchinson, Alison, Law, Katie, Shah, Veeraj, Usher‐Smith, Juliet A., Dennison, Rebecca A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13739 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation
por: Taylor, Lily C., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Implementation of risk stratification within bowel cancer screening: a community jury study exploring public acceptability and communication needs
por: Taylor, Lily C., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A community jury study exploring the public acceptability of using risk stratification to determine eligibility for cancer screening
por: Dennison, Rebecca A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Public Preferences for Determining Eligibility for Screening in
Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening Programs: A Discrete Choice
Experiment
por: Dennison, Rebecca A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population‐based survey
por: Usher‐Smith, Juliet A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)