Cargando…

Prophylactic effect of negative‐pressure wound therapy and delayed sutures against incisional‐surgical site infection after emergency laparotomy for colorectal perforation: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

AIM: The prophylactic effect of negative‐pressure wound therapy against incisional surgical site infection after highly contaminated laparotomies has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effect of negative‐pressure wound therapy against incisional surgical si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakatsutsumi, Keita, Endo, Akira, Asano, Hiroshi, Shinohara, Shoichi, Kurosaki, Ryo, Kawashima, Shuji, Ishii, Wataru, Nozawa, Masashi, Tagaya, Nobumi, Otomo, Yasuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12643
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The prophylactic effect of negative‐pressure wound therapy against incisional surgical site infection after highly contaminated laparotomies has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effect of negative‐pressure wound therapy against incisional surgical site infection after emergency surgery for colorectal perforation. METHODS: This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the 48 emergency hospitals certificated by the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine. Patients who underwent an emergency laparotomy for colorectal perforation between April 2015 and March 2020 were included in this study. Outcomes, including the incidence of incisional surgical site infection, were compared between patients who were treated with prophylactic negative‐pressure wound therapy and delayed sutures (i.e., negative‐pressure wound therapy group) and patients who were treated with regular wound management (i.e., control group) using 1:4 propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: The negative‐pressure wound therapy group comprised 88 patients, whereas the control group consisted of 1535 patients. Of them, 82 propensity score‐matched pairs (negative‐pressure wound therapy group: 82; control group: 328) were evaluated. The negative‐pressure wound therapy group showed a lower incidence of incisional surgical site infection [18 (22.0%) in the negative‐pressure wound therapy group and 115 (35.0%) in the control group, odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.92; p = 0.026]. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic use of negative‐pressure wound therapy with delayed sutures was associated with a lower incidence of incisional surgical site infection after emergency surgery for colorectal perforation.