Cargando…

Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales

BACKGROUND: Online technology could potentially revolutionise how patients are cognitively assessed and monitored. However, it remains unclear whether assessments conducted remotely can match established pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Del Giovane, Martina, Trender, William R., Bălăeţ, Maria, Mallas, Emma-Jane, Jolly, Amy E., Bourke, Niall J., Zimmermann, Karl, Graham, Neil S.N., Lai, Helen, Losty, Ethan J.F., Oiarbide, Garazi Araña, Hellyer, Peter J., Faiman, Irene, Daniels, Sarah J.C., Batey, Philippa, Harrison, Matthew, Giunchiglia, Valentina, Kolanko, Magdalena A., David, Michael C.B., Li, Lucia M., Demarchi, Célia, Friedland, Daniel, Sharp, David J., Hampshire, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101980
_version_ 1785036235289395200
author Del Giovane, Martina
Trender, William R.
Bălăeţ, Maria
Mallas, Emma-Jane
Jolly, Amy E.
Bourke, Niall J.
Zimmermann, Karl
Graham, Neil S.N.
Lai, Helen
Losty, Ethan J.F.
Oiarbide, Garazi Araña
Hellyer, Peter J.
Faiman, Irene
Daniels, Sarah J.C.
Batey, Philippa
Harrison, Matthew
Giunchiglia, Valentina
Kolanko, Magdalena A.
David, Michael C.B.
Li, Lucia M.
Demarchi, Célia
Friedland, Daniel
Sharp, David J.
Hampshire, Adam
author_facet Del Giovane, Martina
Trender, William R.
Bălăeţ, Maria
Mallas, Emma-Jane
Jolly, Amy E.
Bourke, Niall J.
Zimmermann, Karl
Graham, Neil S.N.
Lai, Helen
Losty, Ethan J.F.
Oiarbide, Garazi Araña
Hellyer, Peter J.
Faiman, Irene
Daniels, Sarah J.C.
Batey, Philippa
Harrison, Matthew
Giunchiglia, Valentina
Kolanko, Magdalena A.
David, Michael C.B.
Li, Lucia M.
Demarchi, Célia
Friedland, Daniel
Sharp, David J.
Hampshire, Adam
author_sort Del Giovane, Martina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Online technology could potentially revolutionise how patients are cognitively assessed and monitored. However, it remains unclear whether assessments conducted remotely can match established pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This observational study aimed to optimise an online cognitive assessment for use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinics. The tertiary referral clinic in which this tool has been clinically implemented typically sees patients a minimum of 6 months post-injury in the chronic phase. Between March and August 2019, we conducted a cross-group, cross-device and factor analyses at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic and major trauma wards at Imperial College NHS trust and St. George’s Hospital in London (UK), to identify a battery of tasks that assess aspects of cognition affected by TBI. Between September 2019 and February 2020, we evaluated the online battery against standard face-to-face neuropsychological tests at the Imperial College London research centre. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) determined the shared variance between the online battery and standard neuropsychological tests. Finally, between October 2020 and December 2021, the tests were integrated into a framework that automatically generates a results report where patients’ performance is compared to a large normative dataset. We piloted this as a practical tool to be used under supervised and unsupervised conditions at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic in London (UK). FINDINGS: The online assessment discriminated processing-speed, visual-attention, working-memory, and executive-function deficits in TBI. CCA identified two significant modes indicating shared variance with standard neuropsychological tests (r = 0.86, p < 0.001 and r = 0.81, p = 0.02). Sensitivity to cognitive deficits after TBI was evident in the TBI clinic setting under supervised and unsupervised conditions (F (15,555) = 3.99; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Online cognitive assessment of TBI patients is feasible, sensitive, and efficient. When combined with normative sociodemographic models and autogenerated reports, it has the potential to transform cognitive assessment in the healthcare setting. FUNDING: This work was funded by a 10.13039/501100009127National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Invention for Innovation (i4i) grant awarded to DJS and AH (II-LB-0715-20006).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10154960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101549602023-05-04 Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales Del Giovane, Martina Trender, William R. Bălăeţ, Maria Mallas, Emma-Jane Jolly, Amy E. Bourke, Niall J. Zimmermann, Karl Graham, Neil S.N. Lai, Helen Losty, Ethan J.F. Oiarbide, Garazi Araña Hellyer, Peter J. Faiman, Irene Daniels, Sarah J.C. Batey, Philippa Harrison, Matthew Giunchiglia, Valentina Kolanko, Magdalena A. David, Michael C.B. Li, Lucia M. Demarchi, Célia Friedland, Daniel Sharp, David J. Hampshire, Adam eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Online technology could potentially revolutionise how patients are cognitively assessed and monitored. However, it remains unclear whether assessments conducted remotely can match established pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This observational study aimed to optimise an online cognitive assessment for use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinics. The tertiary referral clinic in which this tool has been clinically implemented typically sees patients a minimum of 6 months post-injury in the chronic phase. Between March and August 2019, we conducted a cross-group, cross-device and factor analyses at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic and major trauma wards at Imperial College NHS trust and St. George’s Hospital in London (UK), to identify a battery of tasks that assess aspects of cognition affected by TBI. Between September 2019 and February 2020, we evaluated the online battery against standard face-to-face neuropsychological tests at the Imperial College London research centre. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) determined the shared variance between the online battery and standard neuropsychological tests. Finally, between October 2020 and December 2021, the tests were integrated into a framework that automatically generates a results report where patients’ performance is compared to a large normative dataset. We piloted this as a practical tool to be used under supervised and unsupervised conditions at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic in London (UK). FINDINGS: The online assessment discriminated processing-speed, visual-attention, working-memory, and executive-function deficits in TBI. CCA identified two significant modes indicating shared variance with standard neuropsychological tests (r = 0.86, p < 0.001 and r = 0.81, p = 0.02). Sensitivity to cognitive deficits after TBI was evident in the TBI clinic setting under supervised and unsupervised conditions (F (15,555) = 3.99; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Online cognitive assessment of TBI patients is feasible, sensitive, and efficient. When combined with normative sociodemographic models and autogenerated reports, it has the potential to transform cognitive assessment in the healthcare setting. FUNDING: This work was funded by a 10.13039/501100009127National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Invention for Innovation (i4i) grant awarded to DJS and AH (II-LB-0715-20006). Elsevier 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10154960/ /pubmed/37152359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101980 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Del Giovane, Martina
Trender, William R.
Bălăeţ, Maria
Mallas, Emma-Jane
Jolly, Amy E.
Bourke, Niall J.
Zimmermann, Karl
Graham, Neil S.N.
Lai, Helen
Losty, Ethan J.F.
Oiarbide, Garazi Araña
Hellyer, Peter J.
Faiman, Irene
Daniels, Sarah J.C.
Batey, Philippa
Harrison, Matthew
Giunchiglia, Valentina
Kolanko, Magdalena A.
David, Michael C.B.
Li, Lucia M.
Demarchi, Célia
Friedland, Daniel
Sharp, David J.
Hampshire, Adam
Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
title Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
title_full Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
title_fullStr Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
title_full_unstemmed Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
title_short Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
title_sort computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101980
work_keys_str_mv AT delgiovanemartina computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT trenderwilliamr computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT balaetmaria computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT mallasemmajane computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT jollyamye computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT bourkeniallj computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT zimmermannkarl computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT grahamneilsn computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT laihelen computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT lostyethanjf computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT oiarbidegaraziarana computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT hellyerpeterj computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT faimanirene computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT danielssarahjc computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT bateyphilippa computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT harrisonmatthew computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT giunchigliavalentina computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT kolankomagdalenaa computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT davidmichaelcb computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT liluciam computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT demarchicelia computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT friedlanddaniel computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT sharpdavidj computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales
AT hampshireadam computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales