Cargando…
Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales
BACKGROUND: Online technology could potentially revolutionise how patients are cognitively assessed and monitored. However, it remains unclear whether assessments conducted remotely can match established pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This ob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101980 |
_version_ | 1785036235289395200 |
---|---|
author | Del Giovane, Martina Trender, William R. Bălăeţ, Maria Mallas, Emma-Jane Jolly, Amy E. Bourke, Niall J. Zimmermann, Karl Graham, Neil S.N. Lai, Helen Losty, Ethan J.F. Oiarbide, Garazi Araña Hellyer, Peter J. Faiman, Irene Daniels, Sarah J.C. Batey, Philippa Harrison, Matthew Giunchiglia, Valentina Kolanko, Magdalena A. David, Michael C.B. Li, Lucia M. Demarchi, Célia Friedland, Daniel Sharp, David J. Hampshire, Adam |
author_facet | Del Giovane, Martina Trender, William R. Bălăeţ, Maria Mallas, Emma-Jane Jolly, Amy E. Bourke, Niall J. Zimmermann, Karl Graham, Neil S.N. Lai, Helen Losty, Ethan J.F. Oiarbide, Garazi Araña Hellyer, Peter J. Faiman, Irene Daniels, Sarah J.C. Batey, Philippa Harrison, Matthew Giunchiglia, Valentina Kolanko, Magdalena A. David, Michael C.B. Li, Lucia M. Demarchi, Célia Friedland, Daniel Sharp, David J. Hampshire, Adam |
author_sort | Del Giovane, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Online technology could potentially revolutionise how patients are cognitively assessed and monitored. However, it remains unclear whether assessments conducted remotely can match established pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This observational study aimed to optimise an online cognitive assessment for use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinics. The tertiary referral clinic in which this tool has been clinically implemented typically sees patients a minimum of 6 months post-injury in the chronic phase. Between March and August 2019, we conducted a cross-group, cross-device and factor analyses at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic and major trauma wards at Imperial College NHS trust and St. George’s Hospital in London (UK), to identify a battery of tasks that assess aspects of cognition affected by TBI. Between September 2019 and February 2020, we evaluated the online battery against standard face-to-face neuropsychological tests at the Imperial College London research centre. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) determined the shared variance between the online battery and standard neuropsychological tests. Finally, between October 2020 and December 2021, the tests were integrated into a framework that automatically generates a results report where patients’ performance is compared to a large normative dataset. We piloted this as a practical tool to be used under supervised and unsupervised conditions at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic in London (UK). FINDINGS: The online assessment discriminated processing-speed, visual-attention, working-memory, and executive-function deficits in TBI. CCA identified two significant modes indicating shared variance with standard neuropsychological tests (r = 0.86, p < 0.001 and r = 0.81, p = 0.02). Sensitivity to cognitive deficits after TBI was evident in the TBI clinic setting under supervised and unsupervised conditions (F (15,555) = 3.99; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Online cognitive assessment of TBI patients is feasible, sensitive, and efficient. When combined with normative sociodemographic models and autogenerated reports, it has the potential to transform cognitive assessment in the healthcare setting. FUNDING: This work was funded by a 10.13039/501100009127National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Invention for Innovation (i4i) grant awarded to DJS and AH (II-LB-0715-20006). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10154960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101549602023-05-04 Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales Del Giovane, Martina Trender, William R. Bălăeţ, Maria Mallas, Emma-Jane Jolly, Amy E. Bourke, Niall J. Zimmermann, Karl Graham, Neil S.N. Lai, Helen Losty, Ethan J.F. Oiarbide, Garazi Araña Hellyer, Peter J. Faiman, Irene Daniels, Sarah J.C. Batey, Philippa Harrison, Matthew Giunchiglia, Valentina Kolanko, Magdalena A. David, Michael C.B. Li, Lucia M. Demarchi, Célia Friedland, Daniel Sharp, David J. Hampshire, Adam eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Online technology could potentially revolutionise how patients are cognitively assessed and monitored. However, it remains unclear whether assessments conducted remotely can match established pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This observational study aimed to optimise an online cognitive assessment for use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinics. The tertiary referral clinic in which this tool has been clinically implemented typically sees patients a minimum of 6 months post-injury in the chronic phase. Between March and August 2019, we conducted a cross-group, cross-device and factor analyses at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic and major trauma wards at Imperial College NHS trust and St. George’s Hospital in London (UK), to identify a battery of tasks that assess aspects of cognition affected by TBI. Between September 2019 and February 2020, we evaluated the online battery against standard face-to-face neuropsychological tests at the Imperial College London research centre. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) determined the shared variance between the online battery and standard neuropsychological tests. Finally, between October 2020 and December 2021, the tests were integrated into a framework that automatically generates a results report where patients’ performance is compared to a large normative dataset. We piloted this as a practical tool to be used under supervised and unsupervised conditions at the St. Mary’s Hospital TBI clinic in London (UK). FINDINGS: The online assessment discriminated processing-speed, visual-attention, working-memory, and executive-function deficits in TBI. CCA identified two significant modes indicating shared variance with standard neuropsychological tests (r = 0.86, p < 0.001 and r = 0.81, p = 0.02). Sensitivity to cognitive deficits after TBI was evident in the TBI clinic setting under supervised and unsupervised conditions (F (15,555) = 3.99; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Online cognitive assessment of TBI patients is feasible, sensitive, and efficient. When combined with normative sociodemographic models and autogenerated reports, it has the potential to transform cognitive assessment in the healthcare setting. FUNDING: This work was funded by a 10.13039/501100009127National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Invention for Innovation (i4i) grant awarded to DJS and AH (II-LB-0715-20006). Elsevier 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10154960/ /pubmed/37152359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101980 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Del Giovane, Martina Trender, William R. Bălăeţ, Maria Mallas, Emma-Jane Jolly, Amy E. Bourke, Niall J. Zimmermann, Karl Graham, Neil S.N. Lai, Helen Losty, Ethan J.F. Oiarbide, Garazi Araña Hellyer, Peter J. Faiman, Irene Daniels, Sarah J.C. Batey, Philippa Harrison, Matthew Giunchiglia, Valentina Kolanko, Magdalena A. David, Michael C.B. Li, Lucia M. Demarchi, Célia Friedland, Daniel Sharp, David J. Hampshire, Adam Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
title | Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
title_full | Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
title_fullStr | Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
title_full_unstemmed | Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
title_short | Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
title_sort | computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delgiovanemartina computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT trenderwilliamr computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT balaetmaria computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT mallasemmajane computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT jollyamye computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT bourkeniallj computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT zimmermannkarl computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT grahamneilsn computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT laihelen computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT lostyethanjf computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT oiarbidegaraziarana computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT hellyerpeterj computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT faimanirene computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT danielssarahjc computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT bateyphilippa computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT harrisonmatthew computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT giunchigliavalentina computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT kolankomagdalenaa computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT davidmichaelcb computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT liluciam computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT demarchicelia computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT friedlanddaniel computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT sharpdavidj computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales AT hampshireadam computerisedcognitiveassessmentinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudyoffeasibilityandsensitivityrelativetoestablishedclinicalscales |