Cargando…

Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland

During the coronavirus pandemic, significantly more pets were probably bought and kept. This study focuses on whether more zoophilic dermatophytes have subsequently been isolated and which species predominate. In the 1‑year period from March 2020 through February 2021, all zoophilic dermatophytes fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uhrlaß, Silke, Mayser, Peter, Koch, Daniela, Mütze, Hanna, Krüger, Constanze, Schulze, Ina, Nenoff, Pietro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00105-023-05150-5
_version_ 1785036267672567808
author Uhrlaß, Silke
Mayser, Peter
Koch, Daniela
Mütze, Hanna
Krüger, Constanze
Schulze, Ina
Nenoff, Pietro
author_facet Uhrlaß, Silke
Mayser, Peter
Koch, Daniela
Mütze, Hanna
Krüger, Constanze
Schulze, Ina
Nenoff, Pietro
author_sort Uhrlaß, Silke
collection PubMed
description During the coronavirus pandemic, significantly more pets were probably bought and kept. This study focuses on whether more zoophilic dermatophytes have subsequently been isolated and which species predominate. In the 1‑year period from March 2020 through February 2021, all zoophilic dermatophytes from all submissions to the Mölbis laboratory were recorded. Both the cultural and the molecular evidence of fungal detection from skin scrapings, hair roots, and, in single cases, from nails, were considered. For dermatophyte DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) detection, an in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used. In distinct cases, identification of dermatophytes was confirmed by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rDNA, and of the gene of the translation elongation factor (TEF)-1α. In 579 (2.56%) of 22,575 samples studied in the year 2020/2021, zoophilic dermatophytes were detectable with PCR–ELISA and/or by cultivation. In comparison, the proportion of zoophilic dermatophytes was 2.03% in the 1‑year period 2014/2015, and only 1.6% in 2018/2019. The 579 zoophilic dermatophytes were identified as follows: Trichophyton (T.) benhamiae 186 (32.1%), T. mentagrophytes 173 (29.9%), T. quinckeanum 110 (19.0%), Microsporum (M.) canis 78 (13.5%), T. verrucosum 22 (3.8%), Nannizzia (N.) persicolor 8 (1.4%), T. erinacei 1 (0.2%), and T. equinum 1 (0.2%). T. benhamiae had the highest prevalence from June to September 2020, then again in December. T. quinckeanum is associated with a sharp increase in the mice population in Germany in 2020; a significant increase was found in the months September 2020 to January 2021. T. mentagrophytes had a conspicuous peak in September. Compered with that M. canis in November. Up to 50% of the dermatophytoses caused by T. mentagrophytes, T. quinckeanum, and M. canis affected children and adolescents, while in the case of T. benhamiae it was as much as two thirds. Tinea corporis was the most common, followed by tinea faciei and tinea capitis. M. canis infections affected the capillitium more frequently than the face. Zoophilic dermatophytes were increasingly isolated during the coronavirus pandemic in Germany when compared to previous year periods. In first place, the dermatophyte T. benhamiae from guinea pigs was found in children and adolescents. A significant proportion of dermatophytoses concerned adults. T. quinckeanum is an emerging pathogen in Germany with unprecedented high infection rates in 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10155132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101551322023-05-09 Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland Uhrlaß, Silke Mayser, Peter Koch, Daniela Mütze, Hanna Krüger, Constanze Schulze, Ina Nenoff, Pietro Dermatologie (Heidelb) Originalien During the coronavirus pandemic, significantly more pets were probably bought and kept. This study focuses on whether more zoophilic dermatophytes have subsequently been isolated and which species predominate. In the 1‑year period from March 2020 through February 2021, all zoophilic dermatophytes from all submissions to the Mölbis laboratory were recorded. Both the cultural and the molecular evidence of fungal detection from skin scrapings, hair roots, and, in single cases, from nails, were considered. For dermatophyte DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) detection, an in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used. In distinct cases, identification of dermatophytes was confirmed by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rDNA, and of the gene of the translation elongation factor (TEF)-1α. In 579 (2.56%) of 22,575 samples studied in the year 2020/2021, zoophilic dermatophytes were detectable with PCR–ELISA and/or by cultivation. In comparison, the proportion of zoophilic dermatophytes was 2.03% in the 1‑year period 2014/2015, and only 1.6% in 2018/2019. The 579 zoophilic dermatophytes were identified as follows: Trichophyton (T.) benhamiae 186 (32.1%), T. mentagrophytes 173 (29.9%), T. quinckeanum 110 (19.0%), Microsporum (M.) canis 78 (13.5%), T. verrucosum 22 (3.8%), Nannizzia (N.) persicolor 8 (1.4%), T. erinacei 1 (0.2%), and T. equinum 1 (0.2%). T. benhamiae had the highest prevalence from June to September 2020, then again in December. T. quinckeanum is associated with a sharp increase in the mice population in Germany in 2020; a significant increase was found in the months September 2020 to January 2021. T. mentagrophytes had a conspicuous peak in September. Compered with that M. canis in November. Up to 50% of the dermatophytoses caused by T. mentagrophytes, T. quinckeanum, and M. canis affected children and adolescents, while in the case of T. benhamiae it was as much as two thirds. Tinea corporis was the most common, followed by tinea faciei and tinea capitis. M. canis infections affected the capillitium more frequently than the face. Zoophilic dermatophytes were increasingly isolated during the coronavirus pandemic in Germany when compared to previous year periods. In first place, the dermatophyte T. benhamiae from guinea pigs was found in children and adolescents. A significant proportion of dermatophytoses concerned adults. T. quinckeanum is an emerging pathogen in Germany with unprecedented high infection rates in 2020. Springer Medizin 2023-05-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10155132/ /pubmed/37133787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00105-023-05150-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2023 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Originalien
Uhrlaß, Silke
Mayser, Peter
Koch, Daniela
Mütze, Hanna
Krüger, Constanze
Schulze, Ina
Nenoff, Pietro
Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland
title Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland
title_full Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland
title_fullStr Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland
title_full_unstemmed Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland
title_short Zoophile Dermatophyten während der Corona-Pandemie in Deutschland
title_sort zoophile dermatophyten während der corona-pandemie in deutschland
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00105-023-05150-5
work_keys_str_mv AT uhrlaßsilke zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland
AT mayserpeter zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland
AT kochdaniela zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland
AT mutzehanna zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland
AT krugerconstanze zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland
AT schulzeina zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland
AT nenoffpietro zoophiledermatophytenwahrenddercoronapandemieindeutschland