Cargando…

PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after one year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional prospective interventional cohort study comparing eyes with POAG, which had received the PRESERFLO™ M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamke, Melanie, Herber, Robert, Haase, Maike A., Jasper, Carolin S., Pillunat, Lutz E., Pillunat, Karin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06075-4
_version_ 1785036277790277632
author Jamke, Melanie
Herber, Robert
Haase, Maike A.
Jasper, Carolin S.
Pillunat, Lutz E.
Pillunat, Karin R.
author_facet Jamke, Melanie
Herber, Robert
Haase, Maike A.
Jasper, Carolin S.
Pillunat, Lutz E.
Pillunat, Karin R.
author_sort Jamke, Melanie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after one year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional prospective interventional cohort study comparing eyes with POAG, which had received the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy. The MicroShunt group was matched with the trabeculectomy group for age, known duration of disease, and number and classes of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications to have similar conjunctival conditions. The study is part of the Dresden Glaucoma and Treatment Study, using a uniform study design, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-ups and standardized definitions of success and failure for both procedures. Primary outcome measures: mean diurnal IOP (mdIOP, mean of 6 measurements), peak IOP, and IOP fluctuations. Secondary outcome measures: success rates, number of IOP lowering medications, visual acuity, visual fields, complications, surgical interventions, and adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty eyes of 60 patients, 30 in each group, were analyzed after 1-year follow-ups. Median [Q25, Q75] mdIOP (mmHg) dropped from 16.2 [13.8–21.5] to 10.5 [8.9–13.5] in the MicroShunt and from 17.6 [15.6–24.0] to 11.1 [9.5–12.3] in the trabeculectomy group, both without glaucoma medications. Reduction of mdIOP (P = .596), peak IOP (P = .702), and IOP fluctuations (P = .528) was not statistically significantly different between groups. The rate of interventions was statistically significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group, especially in the early postoperative period (P = .018). None of the patients experienced severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both procedures are equally effective and safe in lowering mdIOP, peak IOP and IOP fluctuations in patients with POAG, one year after surgery. Clinical trial registration: NCT02959242.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10155172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101551722023-05-09 PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety Jamke, Melanie Herber, Robert Haase, Maike A. Jasper, Carolin S. Pillunat, Lutz E. Pillunat, Karin R. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Glaucoma PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after one year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional prospective interventional cohort study comparing eyes with POAG, which had received the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy. The MicroShunt group was matched with the trabeculectomy group for age, known duration of disease, and number and classes of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications to have similar conjunctival conditions. The study is part of the Dresden Glaucoma and Treatment Study, using a uniform study design, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-ups and standardized definitions of success and failure for both procedures. Primary outcome measures: mean diurnal IOP (mdIOP, mean of 6 measurements), peak IOP, and IOP fluctuations. Secondary outcome measures: success rates, number of IOP lowering medications, visual acuity, visual fields, complications, surgical interventions, and adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty eyes of 60 patients, 30 in each group, were analyzed after 1-year follow-ups. Median [Q25, Q75] mdIOP (mmHg) dropped from 16.2 [13.8–21.5] to 10.5 [8.9–13.5] in the MicroShunt and from 17.6 [15.6–24.0] to 11.1 [9.5–12.3] in the trabeculectomy group, both without glaucoma medications. Reduction of mdIOP (P = .596), peak IOP (P = .702), and IOP fluctuations (P = .528) was not statistically significantly different between groups. The rate of interventions was statistically significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group, especially in the early postoperative period (P = .018). None of the patients experienced severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both procedures are equally effective and safe in lowering mdIOP, peak IOP and IOP fluctuations in patients with POAG, one year after surgery. Clinical trial registration: NCT02959242. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10155172/ /pubmed/37133501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06075-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Glaucoma
Jamke, Melanie
Herber, Robert
Haase, Maike A.
Jasper, Carolin S.
Pillunat, Lutz E.
Pillunat, Karin R.
PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
title PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
title_full PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
title_fullStr PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
title_full_unstemmed PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
title_short PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
title_sort preserflo ™ microshunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety
topic Glaucoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06075-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jamkemelanie preserflomicroshuntversustrabeculectomy1yearresultsonefficacyandsafety
AT herberrobert preserflomicroshuntversustrabeculectomy1yearresultsonefficacyandsafety
AT haasemaikea preserflomicroshuntversustrabeculectomy1yearresultsonefficacyandsafety
AT jaspercarolins preserflomicroshuntversustrabeculectomy1yearresultsonefficacyandsafety
AT pillunatlutze preserflomicroshuntversustrabeculectomy1yearresultsonefficacyandsafety
AT pillunatkarinr preserflomicroshuntversustrabeculectomy1yearresultsonefficacyandsafety