Cargando…

Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention

This brief review focuses on two contentious issues within the field of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); the first is the recent effort to redefine NAFLD as metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The modification of “NAFLD” to “MAFLD” is expected to highlight the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jennison, Erica, Byrne, Christopher D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculty Opinions Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153139
http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/r/12-10
_version_ 1785036282666156032
author Jennison, Erica
Byrne, Christopher D
author_facet Jennison, Erica
Byrne, Christopher D
author_sort Jennison, Erica
collection PubMed
description This brief review focuses on two contentious issues within the field of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); the first is the recent effort to redefine NAFLD as metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The modification of “NAFLD” to “MAFLD” is expected to highlight the role of metabolic factors in the disease aetiology, which is hoped to improve patient understanding of the disease, facilitate patient-physician communication and highlight the importance of public health interventions in prevention and management. The diagnostic criteria for MAFLD allow it to coexist with other forms of liver disease, which recognises that metabolic dysfunction contributes towards disease progression in other liver pathologies, such as alcoholic liver disease. However, there remain concerns that renaming NAFLD may be premature without fully considering the broader implications, from diagnostic criteria to trial endpoints; therefore, the new definition has not yet been accepted by major societies. Another contentious issue within the field is the gap in our understanding of how patients undergoing therapeutic interventions should be monitored to assess amelioration/attenuation or the worsening of their liver disease. Biomarker scoring systems (such as the ELF test and FIB-4 test) and imaging techniques (such as transient elastography [TE] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] techniques) are proven to be reasonably accurate, and comparable with histology, in the diagnosis of NAFLD and evaluation of disease severity; however, their use in monitoring the response of disease to therapeutic interventions is not well established. Whilst biomarker scoring systems and TE are limited by poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting moderate fibrosis (e.g. F2 liver fibrosis defined by histology), more accurate MRI techniques are not practical for routine patient follow-up due to their expense and limited availability. More work is required to determine the most appropriate method by which therapeutic interventions for NAFLD should be monitored in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10155199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Faculty Opinions Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101551992023-05-04 Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention Jennison, Erica Byrne, Christopher D Fac Rev Review Article This brief review focuses on two contentious issues within the field of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); the first is the recent effort to redefine NAFLD as metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The modification of “NAFLD” to “MAFLD” is expected to highlight the role of metabolic factors in the disease aetiology, which is hoped to improve patient understanding of the disease, facilitate patient-physician communication and highlight the importance of public health interventions in prevention and management. The diagnostic criteria for MAFLD allow it to coexist with other forms of liver disease, which recognises that metabolic dysfunction contributes towards disease progression in other liver pathologies, such as alcoholic liver disease. However, there remain concerns that renaming NAFLD may be premature without fully considering the broader implications, from diagnostic criteria to trial endpoints; therefore, the new definition has not yet been accepted by major societies. Another contentious issue within the field is the gap in our understanding of how patients undergoing therapeutic interventions should be monitored to assess amelioration/attenuation or the worsening of their liver disease. Biomarker scoring systems (such as the ELF test and FIB-4 test) and imaging techniques (such as transient elastography [TE] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] techniques) are proven to be reasonably accurate, and comparable with histology, in the diagnosis of NAFLD and evaluation of disease severity; however, their use in monitoring the response of disease to therapeutic interventions is not well established. Whilst biomarker scoring systems and TE are limited by poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting moderate fibrosis (e.g. F2 liver fibrosis defined by histology), more accurate MRI techniques are not practical for routine patient follow-up due to their expense and limited availability. More work is required to determine the most appropriate method by which therapeutic interventions for NAFLD should be monitored in clinical practice. Faculty Opinions Ltd 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10155199/ /pubmed/37153139 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/r/12-10 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Byrne CD et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jennison, Erica
Byrne, Christopher D
Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention
title Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention
title_full Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention
title_fullStr Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention
title_full_unstemmed Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention
title_short Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention
title_sort recent advances in nafld: current areas of contention
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153139
http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/r/12-10
work_keys_str_mv AT jennisonerica recentadvancesinnafldcurrentareasofcontention
AT byrnechristopherd recentadvancesinnafldcurrentareasofcontention