Cargando…

Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates

PURPOSE: Corneal densitometry analysis provides an objective measurement of corneal transparency in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). To date, no study that focuses on determining the reliability and smallest real difference (SRD), specifically in PRK candidates, has been publis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balparda, Kepa, Mesa-Mesa, Sara, Maya-Naranjo, Maria Isabel, Mora-Sánchez, Carolina, Escobar-Giraldo, Mariana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1121_22
_version_ 1785036350337056768
author Balparda, Kepa
Mesa-Mesa, Sara
Maya-Naranjo, Maria Isabel
Mora-Sánchez, Carolina
Escobar-Giraldo, Mariana
author_facet Balparda, Kepa
Mesa-Mesa, Sara
Maya-Naranjo, Maria Isabel
Mora-Sánchez, Carolina
Escobar-Giraldo, Mariana
author_sort Balparda, Kepa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Corneal densitometry analysis provides an objective measurement of corneal transparency in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). To date, no study that focuses on determining the reliability and smallest real difference (SRD), specifically in PRK candidates, has been published. METHODS: The study was conducted at Clínica de Oftalmología Sandiego, Medellín, Colombia. This was a prospective and analytical study. Refractive surgery candidates underwent Pentacam measurements twice with five minutes of difference. Repeatability of measurements was evaluated for every area using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman’s rank-order correlation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, followed by a within-subjects factor (S(w)) finishing with a determination of the SRD for all areas. Bland–Altman plots were created and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 110 eyes were included. The mean total densitometry was 18.67 ± 1.56 grayscale units (GSU) and 18.65 ± 1.49 GSU for the first and second measurements, respectively. Wilcoxon was non-significant (P > 0.05) while the intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated an excellent agreement. SRD ranged from 0.21 GSU (posterior × 6–10 mm) to 1.79 GSU (total × 10–12 mm). Anterior depths and 10–12 mm annulus had consistently more variability and greater (worse) SRD. The 10–12 mm annulus showed great dispersion on the Bland–Altman plots. CONCLUSION: Corneal densitometry has an excellent repeatability in refractive surgery candidates for areas below 10 mm. Any densitometry change ≥1.0 GSU in areas under 10 mm should be considered as well above measurement noise and corresponding to a real change in measured parameters. The 10–12 mm area does not seem to be reliable enough in refractive surgery candidates to warrant surveillance after corneal-based surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10155537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101555372023-05-04 Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates Balparda, Kepa Mesa-Mesa, Sara Maya-Naranjo, Maria Isabel Mora-Sánchez, Carolina Escobar-Giraldo, Mariana Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: Corneal densitometry analysis provides an objective measurement of corneal transparency in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). To date, no study that focuses on determining the reliability and smallest real difference (SRD), specifically in PRK candidates, has been published. METHODS: The study was conducted at Clínica de Oftalmología Sandiego, Medellín, Colombia. This was a prospective and analytical study. Refractive surgery candidates underwent Pentacam measurements twice with five minutes of difference. Repeatability of measurements was evaluated for every area using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman’s rank-order correlation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, followed by a within-subjects factor (S(w)) finishing with a determination of the SRD for all areas. Bland–Altman plots were created and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 110 eyes were included. The mean total densitometry was 18.67 ± 1.56 grayscale units (GSU) and 18.65 ± 1.49 GSU for the first and second measurements, respectively. Wilcoxon was non-significant (P > 0.05) while the intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated an excellent agreement. SRD ranged from 0.21 GSU (posterior × 6–10 mm) to 1.79 GSU (total × 10–12 mm). Anterior depths and 10–12 mm annulus had consistently more variability and greater (worse) SRD. The 10–12 mm annulus showed great dispersion on the Bland–Altman plots. CONCLUSION: Corneal densitometry has an excellent repeatability in refractive surgery candidates for areas below 10 mm. Any densitometry change ≥1.0 GSU in areas under 10 mm should be considered as well above measurement noise and corresponding to a real change in measured parameters. The 10–12 mm area does not seem to be reliable enough in refractive surgery candidates to warrant surveillance after corneal-based surgery. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-01 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10155537/ /pubmed/36588209 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1121_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Balparda, Kepa
Mesa-Mesa, Sara
Maya-Naranjo, Maria Isabel
Mora-Sánchez, Carolina
Escobar-Giraldo, Mariana
Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
title Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
title_full Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
title_fullStr Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
title_full_unstemmed Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
title_short Determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a Scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
title_sort determination of the repeatability of corneal densitometry as measured with a scheimpflug camera device in refractive surgery candidates
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1121_22
work_keys_str_mv AT balpardakepa determinationoftherepeatabilityofcornealdensitometryasmeasuredwithascheimpflugcameradeviceinrefractivesurgerycandidates
AT mesamesasara determinationoftherepeatabilityofcornealdensitometryasmeasuredwithascheimpflugcameradeviceinrefractivesurgerycandidates
AT mayanaranjomariaisabel determinationoftherepeatabilityofcornealdensitometryasmeasuredwithascheimpflugcameradeviceinrefractivesurgerycandidates
AT morasanchezcarolina determinationoftherepeatabilityofcornealdensitometryasmeasuredwithascheimpflugcameradeviceinrefractivesurgerycandidates
AT escobargiraldomariana determinationoftherepeatabilityofcornealdensitometryasmeasuredwithascheimpflugcameradeviceinrefractivesurgerycandidates