Cargando…

Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review

A growing body of evidence shows that some septic patients experience fluid overload, which leads to an increased number of serious complications and death. This is because the majority of septic patients are fluid non-responders. Therefore, a reliable distinction of which patient would benefit from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weigl, Wojciech, Adamski, Jan, Onichimowski, Dariusz, Nowakowski, Piotr, Wagner, Bodo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413788
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.115368
_version_ 1785036557140361216
author Weigl, Wojciech
Adamski, Jan
Onichimowski, Dariusz
Nowakowski, Piotr
Wagner, Bodo
author_facet Weigl, Wojciech
Adamski, Jan
Onichimowski, Dariusz
Nowakowski, Piotr
Wagner, Bodo
author_sort Weigl, Wojciech
collection PubMed
description A growing body of evidence shows that some septic patients experience fluid overload, which leads to an increased number of serious complications and death. This is because the majority of septic patients are fluid non-responders. Therefore, a reliable distinction of which patient would benefit from fluid boluses is crucial in current sepsis mana-gement. Several methods used to assess fluid responsiveness have been developed. The principle of “dynamic” measurements (in contrast to static indices such as central venous pressure) involves the induction of a change in cardiac preload and the measurement of its effect on stroke volume. Dynamic methods are based on either heart-lung interaction during mechanical ventilation or on an assessment of change in cardiac stroke volume in response to fluid provocative stimuli such as rapid fluid administration, passive leg raising, or the end-expiratory occlusion test. Most dynamic measurements are easy to perform and interpret as well as being available at the bedside. However, they vary in their invasiveness, difficulty in performance, reliability, and limitations. In this study, we provide an overview of various methods for assessing fluid responsiveness and indicate those that potentially lead to haemodynamically guided fluid restrictive treatment that would prevent fluid overload in septic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101565152023-05-17 Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review Weigl, Wojciech Adamski, Jan Onichimowski, Dariusz Nowakowski, Piotr Wagner, Bodo Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Review Articles A growing body of evidence shows that some septic patients experience fluid overload, which leads to an increased number of serious complications and death. This is because the majority of septic patients are fluid non-responders. Therefore, a reliable distinction of which patient would benefit from fluid boluses is crucial in current sepsis mana-gement. Several methods used to assess fluid responsiveness have been developed. The principle of “dynamic” measurements (in contrast to static indices such as central venous pressure) involves the induction of a change in cardiac preload and the measurement of its effect on stroke volume. Dynamic methods are based on either heart-lung interaction during mechanical ventilation or on an assessment of change in cardiac stroke volume in response to fluid provocative stimuli such as rapid fluid administration, passive leg raising, or the end-expiratory occlusion test. Most dynamic measurements are easy to perform and interpret as well as being available at the bedside. However, they vary in their invasiveness, difficulty in performance, reliability, and limitations. In this study, we provide an overview of various methods for assessing fluid responsiveness and indicate those that potentially lead to haemodynamically guided fluid restrictive treatment that would prevent fluid overload in septic patients. Termedia Publishing House 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10156515/ /pubmed/35413788 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.115368 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Weigl, Wojciech
Adamski, Jan
Onichimowski, Dariusz
Nowakowski, Piotr
Wagner, Bodo
Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
title Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
title_full Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
title_fullStr Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
title_short Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
title_sort methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a narrative review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413788
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.115368
work_keys_str_mv AT weiglwojciech methodsofassessingfluidresponsivenessinsepticshockpatientsanarrativereview
AT adamskijan methodsofassessingfluidresponsivenessinsepticshockpatientsanarrativereview
AT onichimowskidariusz methodsofassessingfluidresponsivenessinsepticshockpatientsanarrativereview
AT nowakowskipiotr methodsofassessingfluidresponsivenessinsepticshockpatientsanarrativereview
AT wagnerbodo methodsofassessingfluidresponsivenessinsepticshockpatientsanarrativereview