Cargando…

Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive patients are known to have increased perioperative arterial blood pressure (BP) lability, which is related to cardiovascular events. Masked uncontrolled hypertensive patients are at high cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to compare BP lability during general anaesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siripruekpong, Sirikarn, Geater, Alan F., Cheewatanakornkul, Sirichai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36734451
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.123143
_version_ 1785036559095955456
author Siripruekpong, Sirikarn
Geater, Alan F.
Cheewatanakornkul, Sirichai
author_facet Siripruekpong, Sirikarn
Geater, Alan F.
Cheewatanakornkul, Sirichai
author_sort Siripruekpong, Sirikarn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypertensive patients are known to have increased perioperative arterial blood pressure (BP) lability, which is related to cardiovascular events. Masked uncontrolled hypertensive patients are at high cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to compare BP lability during general anaesthesia in treated hypertensive patients with normal clinic BP, between masked uncontrolled hypertension and adequately controlled hypertension. METHODS: Forty-three patients with apparently controlled BP were initially enrolled in this prospective observational study. Home BP was monitored and patients classified into diagnostic groups. Perioperative BP profiles were recorded from before anaesthesia induction until discharge from the recovery room. BP lability was assessed using 3 methods: (1) out-of-range probability, (2) standard deviation (SD) and variance (VAR), and (3) mean and time-averaged absolute change in BP from one measurement to the next (ARV and TARV). RESULTS: Sixteen masked hypertensive and 21 adequately controlled hypertensive patients were analysed. The masked group had higher of BP lability [95% CI] as measured by SD than the adequately controlled group during intraoperative and postoperative periods (SBP-SD, intraoperative 17.97 [15.33, 20.60] vs. 13.528 [11.22, 15.82], P = 0.014; postoperative 10.40 [7.65, 13.16] vs. 5.49 [2.96, 8.02], P = 0.012). MAP-SD, intraoperative 12.35 [10.70, 13.99] vs. 9.66 [8.22, 11.10], P = 0.017; postoperative 7.21 [5.05, 9,38] vs. 4.06 [2.09, 6.05], P = 0.037). ARV and TARV also revealed higher intraoperative SBP lability; non-time-averaged (mmHg) 12.40 [10.43, 14.37] vs. 9.50 [7.78, 11.22], P = 0.031 and time-averaged (mmHg min(–1)) 2.35 [1.95, 2,74] vs. 1.82 [1.49, 2.16], P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Masked uncontrolled hypertensive patients had significantly higher BP lability in SBP and MAP during the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101565432023-05-17 Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study Siripruekpong, Sirikarn Geater, Alan F. Cheewatanakornkul, Sirichai Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles BACKGROUND: Hypertensive patients are known to have increased perioperative arterial blood pressure (BP) lability, which is related to cardiovascular events. Masked uncontrolled hypertensive patients are at high cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to compare BP lability during general anaesthesia in treated hypertensive patients with normal clinic BP, between masked uncontrolled hypertension and adequately controlled hypertension. METHODS: Forty-three patients with apparently controlled BP were initially enrolled in this prospective observational study. Home BP was monitored and patients classified into diagnostic groups. Perioperative BP profiles were recorded from before anaesthesia induction until discharge from the recovery room. BP lability was assessed using 3 methods: (1) out-of-range probability, (2) standard deviation (SD) and variance (VAR), and (3) mean and time-averaged absolute change in BP from one measurement to the next (ARV and TARV). RESULTS: Sixteen masked hypertensive and 21 adequately controlled hypertensive patients were analysed. The masked group had higher of BP lability [95% CI] as measured by SD than the adequately controlled group during intraoperative and postoperative periods (SBP-SD, intraoperative 17.97 [15.33, 20.60] vs. 13.528 [11.22, 15.82], P = 0.014; postoperative 10.40 [7.65, 13.16] vs. 5.49 [2.96, 8.02], P = 0.012). MAP-SD, intraoperative 12.35 [10.70, 13.99] vs. 9.66 [8.22, 11.10], P = 0.017; postoperative 7.21 [5.05, 9,38] vs. 4.06 [2.09, 6.05], P = 0.037). ARV and TARV also revealed higher intraoperative SBP lability; non-time-averaged (mmHg) 12.40 [10.43, 14.37] vs. 9.50 [7.78, 11.22], P = 0.031 and time-averaged (mmHg min(–1)) 2.35 [1.95, 2,74] vs. 1.82 [1.49, 2.16], P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Masked uncontrolled hypertensive patients had significantly higher BP lability in SBP and MAP during the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods. Termedia Publishing House 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10156543/ /pubmed/36734451 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.123143 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original and Clinical Articles
Siripruekpong, Sirikarn
Geater, Alan F.
Cheewatanakornkul, Sirichai
Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
title Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
title_full Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
title_short Comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
title_sort comparison of intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability during general anaesthesia in masked, uncontrolled hypertensive and adequately controlled hypertensive patients: a prospective observational study
topic Original and Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36734451
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.123143
work_keys_str_mv AT siripruekpongsirikarn comparisonofintraoperativearterialbloodpressurelabilityduringgeneralanaesthesiainmaskeduncontrolledhypertensiveandadequatelycontrolledhypertensivepatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT geateralanf comparisonofintraoperativearterialbloodpressurelabilityduringgeneralanaesthesiainmaskeduncontrolledhypertensiveandadequatelycontrolledhypertensivepatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT cheewatanakornkulsirichai comparisonofintraoperativearterialbloodpressurelabilityduringgeneralanaesthesiainmaskeduncontrolledhypertensiveandadequatelycontrolledhypertensivepatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy