Cargando…
Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO(2) and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (V(T)) of 10–15 mL kg(-1). But then, the use of 6–8 mL kg(-1) became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress sy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345923 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120673 |
_version_ | 1785036559574106112 |
---|---|
author | Placenti, Alejandro Fratebianchi, Franco |
author_facet | Placenti, Alejandro Fratebianchi, Franco |
author_sort | Placenti, Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO(2) and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (V(T)) of 10–15 mL kg(-1). But then, the use of 6–8 mL kg(-1) became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or without lung disease in the operating theatre. It is currently recognized that even low tidal volumes may be excessive for some patients and insufficient for others, depending on its distribution in the aerated lung parenchyma. To carry out intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation, medical literature has focused on positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure (P(aw plateau)), and airway driving pressure (ΔP(aw)). However, considering its limitations, other parameters have emerged that represent a better reflection of isolated lung stress, such as transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔP(L)). These parameters are less generalized in clinical practice due to the requirement of an oeso-phageal balloon for their measurement and therefore their cumbersome application in the operating theatre. However, its study helps in the interpretation of the rest of the ventilator pressures to optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation. This article defines and develops protective ventilation parameters, breaks down their determinants, mentions their limitations, and offers recommendations for their use intraoperatively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10156545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101565452023-05-17 Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review Placenti, Alejandro Fratebianchi, Franco Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Review Articles Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO(2) and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (V(T)) of 10–15 mL kg(-1). But then, the use of 6–8 mL kg(-1) became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or without lung disease in the operating theatre. It is currently recognized that even low tidal volumes may be excessive for some patients and insufficient for others, depending on its distribution in the aerated lung parenchyma. To carry out intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation, medical literature has focused on positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure (P(aw plateau)), and airway driving pressure (ΔP(aw)). However, considering its limitations, other parameters have emerged that represent a better reflection of isolated lung stress, such as transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔP(L)). These parameters are less generalized in clinical practice due to the requirement of an oeso-phageal balloon for their measurement and therefore their cumbersome application in the operating theatre. However, its study helps in the interpretation of the rest of the ventilator pressures to optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation. This article defines and develops protective ventilation parameters, breaks down their determinants, mentions their limitations, and offers recommendations for their use intraoperatively. Termedia Publishing House 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10156545/ /pubmed/36345923 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120673 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Placenti, Alejandro Fratebianchi, Franco Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
title | Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
title_full | Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
title_short | Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
title_sort | interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345923 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT placentialejandro interpretationanduseofintraoperativeprotectiveventilationparametersascopingreview AT fratebianchifranco interpretationanduseofintraoperativeprotectiveventilationparametersascopingreview |