Cargando…

Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review

Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO(2) and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (V(T)) of 10–15 mL kg(-1). But then, the use of 6–8 mL kg(-1) became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Placenti, Alejandro, Fratebianchi, Franco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345923
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120673
_version_ 1785036559574106112
author Placenti, Alejandro
Fratebianchi, Franco
author_facet Placenti, Alejandro
Fratebianchi, Franco
author_sort Placenti, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO(2) and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (V(T)) of 10–15 mL kg(-1). But then, the use of 6–8 mL kg(-1) became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or without lung disease in the operating theatre. It is currently recognized that even low tidal volumes may be excessive for some patients and insufficient for others, depending on its distribution in the aerated lung parenchyma. To carry out intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation, medical literature has focused on positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure (P(aw plateau)), and airway driving pressure (ΔP(aw)). However, considering its limitations, other parameters have emerged that represent a better reflection of isolated lung stress, such as transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔP(L)). These parameters are less generalized in clinical practice due to the requirement of an oeso-phageal balloon for their measurement and therefore their cumbersome application in the operating theatre. However, its study helps in the interpretation of the rest of the ventilator pressures to optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation. This article defines and develops protective ventilation parameters, breaks down their determinants, mentions their limitations, and offers recommendations for their use intraoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101565452023-05-17 Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review Placenti, Alejandro Fratebianchi, Franco Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Review Articles Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO(2) and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (V(T)) of 10–15 mL kg(-1). But then, the use of 6–8 mL kg(-1) became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or without lung disease in the operating theatre. It is currently recognized that even low tidal volumes may be excessive for some patients and insufficient for others, depending on its distribution in the aerated lung parenchyma. To carry out intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation, medical literature has focused on positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure (P(aw plateau)), and airway driving pressure (ΔP(aw)). However, considering its limitations, other parameters have emerged that represent a better reflection of isolated lung stress, such as transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔP(L)). These parameters are less generalized in clinical practice due to the requirement of an oeso-phageal balloon for their measurement and therefore their cumbersome application in the operating theatre. However, its study helps in the interpretation of the rest of the ventilator pressures to optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation. This article defines and develops protective ventilation parameters, breaks down their determinants, mentions their limitations, and offers recommendations for their use intraoperatively. Termedia Publishing House 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10156545/ /pubmed/36345923 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120673 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Placenti, Alejandro
Fratebianchi, Franco
Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
title Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
title_full Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
title_fullStr Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
title_short Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
title_sort interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345923
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120673
work_keys_str_mv AT placentialejandro interpretationanduseofintraoperativeprotectiveventilationparametersascopingreview
AT fratebianchifranco interpretationanduseofintraoperativeprotectiveventilationparametersascopingreview