Cargando…

A Novel Approach to Developing Disease and Outcome−Specific Social Risk Indices

INTRODUCTION: A variety of industry composite indices are employed within health research in risk-adjusted outcome measures and to assess health-related social needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the relationships among risk adjustment, clinical outcomes, and composite indices of social risk have b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korvink, Michael, Gunn, Laura H., Molina, German, Hackner, Dani, Martin, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37149108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.002
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: A variety of industry composite indices are employed within health research in risk-adjusted outcome measures and to assess health-related social needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the relationships among risk adjustment, clinical outcomes, and composite indices of social risk have become relevant topics for research and healthcare operations. Despite the widespread use of these indices, composite indices are often comprised of correlated variables and therefore may be affected by information duplicity of their underlying risk factors. METHODS: A novel approach is proposed to assign outcome- and disease group−driven weights to social risk variables to form disease and outcome−specific social risk indices and apply the approach to the county-level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention social vulnerability factors for demonstration. The method uses a subset of principal components reweighed through Poisson rate regressions while controlling for county-level patient mix. The analyses use 6,135,302 unique patient encounters from 2021 across 7 disease strata. RESULTS: The reweighed index shows reduced root mean squared error in explaining county-level mortality in 5 of the 7 disease strata and equivalent performance in the remaining strata compared with the reduced root mean squared error using the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index as a benchmark. CONCLUSIONS: A robust method is provided, designed to overcome challenges with current social risk indices, by accounting for redundancy and assigning more meaningful disease and outcome−specific variable weights.