Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance

BACKGROUND: Several vaccines with demonstrated efficacy for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the COVID mRNA based and adenovector based vaccines’ differential effectiveness during the time of circulation of the Delta variant and determine w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, Nazmul, Griffin, Daniel O., Jarvis, Megan S., Cohen, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37163164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16006
_version_ 1785036583589642240
author Islam, Nazmul
Griffin, Daniel O.
Jarvis, Megan S.
Cohen, Kenneth
author_facet Islam, Nazmul
Griffin, Daniel O.
Jarvis, Megan S.
Cohen, Kenneth
author_sort Islam, Nazmul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several vaccines with demonstrated efficacy for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the COVID mRNA based and adenovector based vaccines’ differential effectiveness during the time of circulation of the Delta variant and determine what impact this would have on population health and cost effectiveness. METHODS: We used de-identified claims in a research database that included vaccination status and Covid-positivity status. Individuals ≥18 years, fully vaccinated with Ad26.COV2·S/J&J/Janssen, mRNA-1273/Moderna, or BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech by September 30, 2021, were included. Outcomes were SARS-CoV-2-infection, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, inpatient hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, death, and hospice transfers through September 30, 2021. RESULTS: Among ∼6.5 million fully vaccinated individuals in the UHC Medicare Advantage and our commercially insured research database, mRNA-1273 performed better than BNT162b2 for infection, composite-hospitalization (hospitalization/ICU transfer/hospice transfer/death), and composite-ICU transfer (ICU transfer/hospice transfer/death) caused by B.1.612.7 (delta) variant infection. 26 CE.COV2.S performed worse than BNT162b2 for infection, composite-hospitalization, and composite-ICU transfers. The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) with mRNA1273 to prevent one hospitalization at 90 days was 3130 compared to 26 CE.COV2·S and 15,472 compared to BNT162b2. The NNV with mRNA1273 to prevent one ICU transfer at 90 days was 6358 compared to 26 CE.COV2·S and 34,279 compared to BNT162b2. For every one million individuals vaccinated with BNT162b compared to mRNA-1273, the approximate incremental inpatient cost would be $405,000 and the approximate incremental ICU cost would be $662,000. CONCLUSIONS: The two-dose mRNA vaccines' effectiveness significantly exceeded the single-dose Ad26.COV2·S vaccine's effectiveness from population health and cost-effectiveness perspectives. The mRNA1273 vaccine showed slightly more effectiveness than the BNT162b vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101566492023-05-04 Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance Islam, Nazmul Griffin, Daniel O. Jarvis, Megan S. Cohen, Kenneth Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Several vaccines with demonstrated efficacy for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the COVID mRNA based and adenovector based vaccines’ differential effectiveness during the time of circulation of the Delta variant and determine what impact this would have on population health and cost effectiveness. METHODS: We used de-identified claims in a research database that included vaccination status and Covid-positivity status. Individuals ≥18 years, fully vaccinated with Ad26.COV2·S/J&J/Janssen, mRNA-1273/Moderna, or BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech by September 30, 2021, were included. Outcomes were SARS-CoV-2-infection, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, inpatient hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, death, and hospice transfers through September 30, 2021. RESULTS: Among ∼6.5 million fully vaccinated individuals in the UHC Medicare Advantage and our commercially insured research database, mRNA-1273 performed better than BNT162b2 for infection, composite-hospitalization (hospitalization/ICU transfer/hospice transfer/death), and composite-ICU transfer (ICU transfer/hospice transfer/death) caused by B.1.612.7 (delta) variant infection. 26 CE.COV2.S performed worse than BNT162b2 for infection, composite-hospitalization, and composite-ICU transfers. The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) with mRNA1273 to prevent one hospitalization at 90 days was 3130 compared to 26 CE.COV2·S and 15,472 compared to BNT162b2. The NNV with mRNA1273 to prevent one ICU transfer at 90 days was 6358 compared to 26 CE.COV2·S and 34,279 compared to BNT162b2. For every one million individuals vaccinated with BNT162b compared to mRNA-1273, the approximate incremental inpatient cost would be $405,000 and the approximate incremental ICU cost would be $662,000. CONCLUSIONS: The two-dose mRNA vaccines' effectiveness significantly exceeded the single-dose Ad26.COV2·S vaccine's effectiveness from population health and cost-effectiveness perspectives. The mRNA1273 vaccine showed slightly more effectiveness than the BNT162b vaccine. Elsevier 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10156649/ /pubmed/37163164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16006 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Islam, Nazmul
Griffin, Daniel O.
Jarvis, Megan S.
Cohen, Kenneth
Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance
title Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance
title_full Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance
title_short Comparative effectiveness of the sars-CoV-2 vaccines during delta dominance
title_sort comparative effectiveness of the sars-cov-2 vaccines during delta dominance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37163164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16006
work_keys_str_mv AT islamnazmul comparativeeffectivenessofthesarscov2vaccinesduringdeltadominance
AT griffindanielo comparativeeffectivenessofthesarscov2vaccinesduringdeltadominance
AT jarvismegans comparativeeffectivenessofthesarscov2vaccinesduringdeltadominance
AT cohenkenneth comparativeeffectivenessofthesarscov2vaccinesduringdeltadominance