Cargando…

Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation

Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lui, Justin T., Dahm, Valerie, Chen, Joseph M., Lin, Vincent Y., Irish, Jonathan C., Le, Trung N., Chan, Harley H. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33523-2
_version_ 1785036589293895680
author Lui, Justin T.
Dahm, Valerie
Chen, Joseph M.
Lin, Vincent Y.
Irish, Jonathan C.
Le, Trung N.
Chan, Harley H. L.
author_facet Lui, Justin T.
Dahm, Valerie
Chen, Joseph M.
Lin, Vincent Y.
Irish, Jonathan C.
Le, Trung N.
Chan, Harley H. L.
author_sort Lui, Justin T.
collection PubMed
description Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of augmented reality (AR) guided surgery on accuracy, duration, and ease on bone conduction implantation. Five surgeons surgically implanted two different types of conduction implants on cadaveric specimens with and without AR projection. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography scans were superimposed to calculate centre-to-centre distances and angular accuracies. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used to compare centre-to-centre (C-C) and angular accuracies between the control and experimental arms. Additionally, projection accuracy was derived from the distance between the bony fiducials and the projected fiducials using image guidance coordinates. Both operative time (4.3 ± 1.2 min. vs. 6.6 ± 3.5 min., p = 0.030) and centre-to-centre distances surgery (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.0 ± 5.3 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly less in augmented reality guided surgery. The difference in angular accuracy, however, was not significantly different. The overall average distance between the bony fiducial markings and the AR projected fiducials was 1.7 ± 0.6 mm. With direct intraoperative reference, AR-guided surgery enhances bone conduction implant placement while reduces operative time when compared to conventional surgical planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101566782023-05-05 Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation Lui, Justin T. Dahm, Valerie Chen, Joseph M. Lin, Vincent Y. Irish, Jonathan C. Le, Trung N. Chan, Harley H. L. Sci Rep Article Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of augmented reality (AR) guided surgery on accuracy, duration, and ease on bone conduction implantation. Five surgeons surgically implanted two different types of conduction implants on cadaveric specimens with and without AR projection. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography scans were superimposed to calculate centre-to-centre distances and angular accuracies. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used to compare centre-to-centre (C-C) and angular accuracies between the control and experimental arms. Additionally, projection accuracy was derived from the distance between the bony fiducials and the projected fiducials using image guidance coordinates. Both operative time (4.3 ± 1.2 min. vs. 6.6 ± 3.5 min., p = 0.030) and centre-to-centre distances surgery (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.0 ± 5.3 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly less in augmented reality guided surgery. The difference in angular accuracy, however, was not significantly different. The overall average distance between the bony fiducial markings and the AR projected fiducials was 1.7 ± 0.6 mm. With direct intraoperative reference, AR-guided surgery enhances bone conduction implant placement while reduces operative time when compared to conventional surgical planning. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10156678/ /pubmed/37137995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33523-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lui, Justin T.
Dahm, Valerie
Chen, Joseph M.
Lin, Vincent Y.
Irish, Jonathan C.
Le, Trung N.
Chan, Harley H. L.
Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
title Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
title_full Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
title_fullStr Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
title_full_unstemmed Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
title_short Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
title_sort using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33523-2
work_keys_str_mv AT luijustint usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation
AT dahmvalerie usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation
AT chenjosephm usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation
AT linvincenty usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation
AT irishjonathanc usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation
AT letrungn usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation
AT chanharleyhl usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation