Cargando…
Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation
Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33523-2 |
_version_ | 1785036589293895680 |
---|---|
author | Lui, Justin T. Dahm, Valerie Chen, Joseph M. Lin, Vincent Y. Irish, Jonathan C. Le, Trung N. Chan, Harley H. L. |
author_facet | Lui, Justin T. Dahm, Valerie Chen, Joseph M. Lin, Vincent Y. Irish, Jonathan C. Le, Trung N. Chan, Harley H. L. |
author_sort | Lui, Justin T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of augmented reality (AR) guided surgery on accuracy, duration, and ease on bone conduction implantation. Five surgeons surgically implanted two different types of conduction implants on cadaveric specimens with and without AR projection. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography scans were superimposed to calculate centre-to-centre distances and angular accuracies. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used to compare centre-to-centre (C-C) and angular accuracies between the control and experimental arms. Additionally, projection accuracy was derived from the distance between the bony fiducials and the projected fiducials using image guidance coordinates. Both operative time (4.3 ± 1.2 min. vs. 6.6 ± 3.5 min., p = 0.030) and centre-to-centre distances surgery (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.0 ± 5.3 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly less in augmented reality guided surgery. The difference in angular accuracy, however, was not significantly different. The overall average distance between the bony fiducial markings and the AR projected fiducials was 1.7 ± 0.6 mm. With direct intraoperative reference, AR-guided surgery enhances bone conduction implant placement while reduces operative time when compared to conventional surgical planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10156678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101566782023-05-05 Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation Lui, Justin T. Dahm, Valerie Chen, Joseph M. Lin, Vincent Y. Irish, Jonathan C. Le, Trung N. Chan, Harley H. L. Sci Rep Article Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of augmented reality (AR) guided surgery on accuracy, duration, and ease on bone conduction implantation. Five surgeons surgically implanted two different types of conduction implants on cadaveric specimens with and without AR projection. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography scans were superimposed to calculate centre-to-centre distances and angular accuracies. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used to compare centre-to-centre (C-C) and angular accuracies between the control and experimental arms. Additionally, projection accuracy was derived from the distance between the bony fiducials and the projected fiducials using image guidance coordinates. Both operative time (4.3 ± 1.2 min. vs. 6.6 ± 3.5 min., p = 0.030) and centre-to-centre distances surgery (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.0 ± 5.3 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly less in augmented reality guided surgery. The difference in angular accuracy, however, was not significantly different. The overall average distance between the bony fiducial markings and the AR projected fiducials was 1.7 ± 0.6 mm. With direct intraoperative reference, AR-guided surgery enhances bone conduction implant placement while reduces operative time when compared to conventional surgical planning. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10156678/ /pubmed/37137995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33523-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lui, Justin T. Dahm, Valerie Chen, Joseph M. Lin, Vincent Y. Irish, Jonathan C. Le, Trung N. Chan, Harley H. L. Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
title | Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
title_full | Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
title_fullStr | Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
title_short | Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
title_sort | using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33523-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luijustint usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation AT dahmvalerie usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation AT chenjosephm usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation AT linvincenty usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation AT irishjonathanc usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation AT letrungn usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation AT chanharleyhl usingaugmentedrealitytoguideboneconductiondeviceimplantation |