Cargando…

How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review

INTRODUCTIONS: Revision surgery because of weight recurrence is performed in 2.5–33% of primary vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and gastric band (GB) cases. These cases qualify for revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB). METHODS: This retrospective coh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hany, Mohamed, Zidan, Ahmed, Sabry, Karim, Ibrahim, Mohamed, Agayby, Ann Samy Shafiq, Aboelsoud, Moustafa R., Torensma, Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3
_version_ 1785036614081183744
author Hany, Mohamed
Zidan, Ahmed
Sabry, Karim
Ibrahim, Mohamed
Agayby, Ann Samy Shafiq
Aboelsoud, Moustafa R.
Torensma, Bart
author_facet Hany, Mohamed
Zidan, Ahmed
Sabry, Karim
Ibrahim, Mohamed
Agayby, Ann Samy Shafiq
Aboelsoud, Moustafa R.
Torensma, Bart
author_sort Hany, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTIONS: Revision surgery because of weight recurrence is performed in 2.5–33% of primary vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and gastric band (GB) cases. These cases qualify for revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2008 to 2019. A stratification analysis and multivariate logistic regression for prediction modeling compared the possibility of sufficient % excess weight loss (%EWL) ≥ 50 or insufficient %EWL < 50 between three different RRYGB procedures, with primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRYGB) as the control during 2 years of follow-up. A narrative review was conducted to test the presence of prediction models in the literature and their internal and external validity. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients underwent PRYGB, and 338 underwent RRYGB after VBG, LSG, and GB, and completed 2 years of follow-up. Overall, 32.2% of patients after RRYGB had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to 71.3% after PRYGB (p ≤ 0.001). The total %EWL after the revision surgeries for VBG, LSG, and GB was 68.5%, 74.2%, and 64.1%, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). After correcting for confounding factors, the baseline odds ratio (OR) or sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after PRYGB, LSG, VBG, and GB was 2.4, 1.45, 0.29, and 0.32, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Age was the only significant variable in the prediction model (p = 0.0016). It was impossible to develop a validated model after revision surgery because of the differences between stratification and the prediction model. The narrative review showed only 10.2% presence of validation in the prediction models, and 52.5% had external validation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 32.2% of all patients after revisional surgery had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to PRYGB. LSG had the best outcome in the revisional surgery group in the sufficient %EWL group and the best outcome in the insufficient %EWL group. The skewness between the prediction model and stratification resulted in a partially non-functional prediction model. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101567872023-05-05 How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review Hany, Mohamed Zidan, Ahmed Sabry, Karim Ibrahim, Mohamed Agayby, Ann Samy Shafiq Aboelsoud, Moustafa R. Torensma, Bart Obes Surg Original Contributions INTRODUCTIONS: Revision surgery because of weight recurrence is performed in 2.5–33% of primary vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and gastric band (GB) cases. These cases qualify for revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2008 to 2019. A stratification analysis and multivariate logistic regression for prediction modeling compared the possibility of sufficient % excess weight loss (%EWL) ≥ 50 or insufficient %EWL < 50 between three different RRYGB procedures, with primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRYGB) as the control during 2 years of follow-up. A narrative review was conducted to test the presence of prediction models in the literature and their internal and external validity. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients underwent PRYGB, and 338 underwent RRYGB after VBG, LSG, and GB, and completed 2 years of follow-up. Overall, 32.2% of patients after RRYGB had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to 71.3% after PRYGB (p ≤ 0.001). The total %EWL after the revision surgeries for VBG, LSG, and GB was 68.5%, 74.2%, and 64.1%, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). After correcting for confounding factors, the baseline odds ratio (OR) or sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after PRYGB, LSG, VBG, and GB was 2.4, 1.45, 0.29, and 0.32, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Age was the only significant variable in the prediction model (p = 0.0016). It was impossible to develop a validated model after revision surgery because of the differences between stratification and the prediction model. The narrative review showed only 10.2% presence of validation in the prediction models, and 52.5% had external validation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 32.2% of all patients after revisional surgery had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to PRYGB. LSG had the best outcome in the revisional surgery group in the sufficient %EWL group and the best outcome in the insufficient %EWL group. The skewness between the prediction model and stratification resulted in a partially non-functional prediction model. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2023-03-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10156787/ /pubmed/36905504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Hany, Mohamed
Zidan, Ahmed
Sabry, Karim
Ibrahim, Mohamed
Agayby, Ann Samy Shafiq
Aboelsoud, Moustafa R.
Torensma, Bart
How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
title How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
title_full How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
title_fullStr How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
title_short How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review
title_sort how good is stratification and prediction model analysis between primary and revisional roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery? a multi-center study and narrative review
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36905504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hanymohamed howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview
AT zidanahmed howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview
AT sabrykarim howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview
AT ibrahimmohamed howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview
AT agaybyannsamyshafiq howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview
AT aboelsoudmoustafar howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview
AT torensmabart howgoodisstratificationandpredictionmodelanalysisbetweenprimaryandrevisionalrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryamulticenterstudyandnarrativereview