Cargando…
Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study
BACKGROUND: Despite recent design improvements, human factors issues continue to challenge left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate user experience of former non-HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD patients post heart transplantation (HTX) and laypersons (LP) with HM3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01950-3 |
_version_ | 1785036623443918848 |
---|---|
author | Widhalm, Gregor Abart, Theodor Noeske, Moritz Kumer, Lisa Ebenberger, Katharina Atteneder, Clemens Berger, Angelika Laufer, Günther Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Schima, Heinrich Wagner, Michael Schlöglhofer, Thomas |
author_facet | Widhalm, Gregor Abart, Theodor Noeske, Moritz Kumer, Lisa Ebenberger, Katharina Atteneder, Clemens Berger, Angelika Laufer, Günther Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Schima, Heinrich Wagner, Michael Schlöglhofer, Thomas |
author_sort | Widhalm, Gregor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite recent design improvements, human factors issues continue to challenge left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate user experience of former non-HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD patients post heart transplantation (HTX) and laypersons (LP) with HM3 LVAD peripherals in simulated everyday and emergency scenarios. METHODS: This single center cohort study included untrained HTX and LP. Seven scenarios, including battery exchanges (without alarm, advisory alarm, dim light, consolidated bag), change of power supply, driveline dis-/reconnection and controller exchange were simulated. Subjects’ gaze behavior was recorded using eye tracking technology. Success rate, pump-off-time, duration to success (DTS), percental fixation duration per areas of interest and post-scenario-survey results were defined as outcome measures. RESULTS: Thirty subjects completed 210 scenarios, initially solving 82.4% (HTX vs. LP, p = 1.00). Changing power supply revealed highest complexity (DTS = 251 ± 93s, p = 0.76): 26.7% succeeded at first attempt (p = 0.68), 56.7% at second attempt, with significantly more LP failing (p = 0.04), resulting in 10 hazards from driveline disconnections (pump-off-time 2-118s, p = 0.25). Comparison on initial success showed differences in fixation durations for seven areas of interest (p < 0.037). Decreasing DTS during battery exchanges (p < 0.001) indicate high learnability. Exchanging batteries within the bag took longer (median DTS = 75.0 (IQR = 45.0)s, p = 0.09), especially in elderly subjects (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Subjects with less initial success were more afraid of making mistakes (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: This eye tracking based human factors study provided insights into user experiences in handling HM3 peripherals. It highlights unintuitive and hazardous characteristics, providing guidance for future user-centered design of LVAD wearables. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10916-023-01950-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10156833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101568332023-05-05 Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study Widhalm, Gregor Abart, Theodor Noeske, Moritz Kumer, Lisa Ebenberger, Katharina Atteneder, Clemens Berger, Angelika Laufer, Günther Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Schima, Heinrich Wagner, Michael Schlöglhofer, Thomas J Med Syst Original Paper BACKGROUND: Despite recent design improvements, human factors issues continue to challenge left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate user experience of former non-HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD patients post heart transplantation (HTX) and laypersons (LP) with HM3 LVAD peripherals in simulated everyday and emergency scenarios. METHODS: This single center cohort study included untrained HTX and LP. Seven scenarios, including battery exchanges (without alarm, advisory alarm, dim light, consolidated bag), change of power supply, driveline dis-/reconnection and controller exchange were simulated. Subjects’ gaze behavior was recorded using eye tracking technology. Success rate, pump-off-time, duration to success (DTS), percental fixation duration per areas of interest and post-scenario-survey results were defined as outcome measures. RESULTS: Thirty subjects completed 210 scenarios, initially solving 82.4% (HTX vs. LP, p = 1.00). Changing power supply revealed highest complexity (DTS = 251 ± 93s, p = 0.76): 26.7% succeeded at first attempt (p = 0.68), 56.7% at second attempt, with significantly more LP failing (p = 0.04), resulting in 10 hazards from driveline disconnections (pump-off-time 2-118s, p = 0.25). Comparison on initial success showed differences in fixation durations for seven areas of interest (p < 0.037). Decreasing DTS during battery exchanges (p < 0.001) indicate high learnability. Exchanging batteries within the bag took longer (median DTS = 75.0 (IQR = 45.0)s, p = 0.09), especially in elderly subjects (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Subjects with less initial success were more afraid of making mistakes (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: This eye tracking based human factors study provided insights into user experiences in handling HM3 peripherals. It highlights unintuitive and hazardous characteristics, providing guidance for future user-centered design of LVAD wearables. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10916-023-01950-3. Springer US 2023-05-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10156833/ /pubmed/37133553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01950-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Widhalm, Gregor Abart, Theodor Noeske, Moritz Kumer, Lisa Ebenberger, Katharina Atteneder, Clemens Berger, Angelika Laufer, Günther Wiedemann, Dominik Zimpfer, Daniel Schima, Heinrich Wagner, Michael Schlöglhofer, Thomas Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study |
title | Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study |
title_full | Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study |
title_fullStr | Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study |
title_short | Human Factors Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Peripherals: An Eye Tracking Supported Simulation Study |
title_sort | human factors evaluation of heartmate 3 left ventricular assist device peripherals: an eye tracking supported simulation study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01950-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT widhalmgregor humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT abarttheodor humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT noeskemoritz humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT kumerlisa humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT ebenbergerkatharina humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT attenederclemens humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT bergerangelika humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT laufergunther humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT wiedemanndominik humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT zimpferdaniel humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT schimaheinrich humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT wagnermichael humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy AT schloglhoferthomas humanfactorsevaluationofheartmate3leftventricularassistdeviceperipheralsaneyetrackingsupportedsimulationstudy |