Cargando…

Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation

INTRODUCTION: The stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO(2) concentrations (eCO(2)), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. METHODS: A global meta-analysis was performed us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Junliang, Zhang, Weiwei, Zhang, Yun, Wu, Juying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854
_version_ 1785036648702017536
author Zou, Junliang
Zhang, Weiwei
Zhang, Yun
Wu, Juying
author_facet Zou, Junliang
Zhang, Weiwei
Zhang, Yun
Wu, Juying
author_sort Zou, Junliang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO(2) concentrations (eCO(2)), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. METHODS: A global meta-analysis was performed using 884 lines of observations collected from published papers, which analyzed the eCO(2) impact on plant and microbial biomass. RESULTS: A significant positive impact of eCO(2) was observed on various biomass measures, including aboveground biomass (20.5%), belowground biomass (42.6%), soil microbial biomass (10.4%), fungal biomass (11.0%), and bacterial biomass (9.2%). It was found that eCO(2) levels above 200 ppm had a greater impact on plant biomass compared to concentrations at or below 200 ppm. On the other hand, studies showed that positive effects on microbial biomass were more prominent at lower eCO(2) levels (≤200 ppm) than at higher levels (>200 ppm), which could be explained by soil nitrogen limitations. Importantly, our results indicated that aboveground biomass was controlled more by climatic and experimental conditions, while soil properties strongly impacted the stimulation of belowground and microbial biomass. DISCUSSION: Our results provided evidence of the eCO(2) fertilization effect across various ecosystem types, experimental methods, and climates, and provided a quantitative estimate of plant and soil microbial biomass sensitivity to eCO(2). The results obtained in this study suggest that ecosystem models should consider climatic and edaphic factors to more accurately predict the effects of global climate change and their impact on ecosystem functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101569832023-05-05 Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation Zou, Junliang Zhang, Weiwei Zhang, Yun Wu, Juying Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: The stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO(2) concentrations (eCO(2)), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. METHODS: A global meta-analysis was performed using 884 lines of observations collected from published papers, which analyzed the eCO(2) impact on plant and microbial biomass. RESULTS: A significant positive impact of eCO(2) was observed on various biomass measures, including aboveground biomass (20.5%), belowground biomass (42.6%), soil microbial biomass (10.4%), fungal biomass (11.0%), and bacterial biomass (9.2%). It was found that eCO(2) levels above 200 ppm had a greater impact on plant biomass compared to concentrations at or below 200 ppm. On the other hand, studies showed that positive effects on microbial biomass were more prominent at lower eCO(2) levels (≤200 ppm) than at higher levels (>200 ppm), which could be explained by soil nitrogen limitations. Importantly, our results indicated that aboveground biomass was controlled more by climatic and experimental conditions, while soil properties strongly impacted the stimulation of belowground and microbial biomass. DISCUSSION: Our results provided evidence of the eCO(2) fertilization effect across various ecosystem types, experimental methods, and climates, and provided a quantitative estimate of plant and soil microbial biomass sensitivity to eCO(2). The results obtained in this study suggest that ecosystem models should consider climatic and edaphic factors to more accurately predict the effects of global climate change and their impact on ecosystem functions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10156983/ /pubmed/37152733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zou, Zhang, Zhang and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Zou, Junliang
Zhang, Weiwei
Zhang, Yun
Wu, Juying
Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation
title Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation
title_full Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation
title_fullStr Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation
title_full_unstemmed Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation
title_short Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO(2) fumigation
title_sort global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to co(2) fumigation
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854
work_keys_str_mv AT zoujunliang globalpatternsofplantandmicrobialbiomassinresponsetoco2fumigation
AT zhangweiwei globalpatternsofplantandmicrobialbiomassinresponsetoco2fumigation
AT zhangyun globalpatternsofplantandmicrobialbiomassinresponsetoco2fumigation
AT wujuying globalpatternsofplantandmicrobialbiomassinresponsetoco2fumigation