Cargando…

In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive skin examination evolved rapidly in recent years, with multiphoton microscopy (MPM) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) being used to image in‐vivo skin at high resolution. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging clarity between the two techniques and measure th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ke‐Jun, Wang, Zi‐Yi, Han, Yang, Cui, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13340
_version_ 1785036651604475904
author Chen, Ke‐Jun
Wang, Zi‐Yi
Han, Yang
Cui, Yong
author_facet Chen, Ke‐Jun
Wang, Zi‐Yi
Han, Yang
Cui, Yong
author_sort Chen, Ke‐Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noninvasive skin examination evolved rapidly in recent years, with multiphoton microscopy (MPM) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) being used to image in‐vivo skin at high resolution. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging clarity between the two techniques and measure the thickness of the epidermis in different body sites. We also measured the degree of skin aging with noninvasive tools. METHODS: Fifty‐six volunteers were evaluated and measured at three different body sites, including the cheek, volar forearm, and back. We used RCM and MPM to evaluate the clarity of each skin layer, including stratum corneum, stratum granulosum, stratum spinosum, dermo‐epidermal junction, and dermis. We measured epidermal thickness (ET) at the three body sites in individuals of different ages and genders. We assessed skin aging by the second harmonic to autofluorescence aging index of dermis (SAAID), and multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors affecting SAAID. RESULTS: MPM had advantages in observation of stratum granulosum, collagen fiber, and elastic fiber (p < 0.001), but RCM provided better observation in dermo‐epidermal junction layer (p < 0.001). The epidermis was thicker in the cheek area than the volar forearm and back in both RCM and MPM detection, and the average ET measured by MPM was lower than RCM. ET varied among the three body sites with significant differences (p < 0.05). ET was significantly lower at almost all sites in individuals above 40y (p < 0.05). SAAID decreased with age, and more rapidly in women. Cheeks have lower SAAID scores than other body sites. CONCLUSION: MPM and RCM provide noninvasive methods for imaging skin and each method has its own advantages. Epidermal thickness and SAAID correlated with age, gender, and different body sites. MPM could also assess the degree of skin aging, which could guide the clinical treatment of patients with diffferent ages and genders in the above body sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10156995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101569952023-08-11 In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy Chen, Ke‐Jun Wang, Zi‐Yi Han, Yang Cui, Yong Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Noninvasive skin examination evolved rapidly in recent years, with multiphoton microscopy (MPM) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) being used to image in‐vivo skin at high resolution. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging clarity between the two techniques and measure the thickness of the epidermis in different body sites. We also measured the degree of skin aging with noninvasive tools. METHODS: Fifty‐six volunteers were evaluated and measured at three different body sites, including the cheek, volar forearm, and back. We used RCM and MPM to evaluate the clarity of each skin layer, including stratum corneum, stratum granulosum, stratum spinosum, dermo‐epidermal junction, and dermis. We measured epidermal thickness (ET) at the three body sites in individuals of different ages and genders. We assessed skin aging by the second harmonic to autofluorescence aging index of dermis (SAAID), and multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors affecting SAAID. RESULTS: MPM had advantages in observation of stratum granulosum, collagen fiber, and elastic fiber (p < 0.001), but RCM provided better observation in dermo‐epidermal junction layer (p < 0.001). The epidermis was thicker in the cheek area than the volar forearm and back in both RCM and MPM detection, and the average ET measured by MPM was lower than RCM. ET varied among the three body sites with significant differences (p < 0.05). ET was significantly lower at almost all sites in individuals above 40y (p < 0.05). SAAID decreased with age, and more rapidly in women. Cheeks have lower SAAID scores than other body sites. CONCLUSION: MPM and RCM provide noninvasive methods for imaging skin and each method has its own advantages. Epidermal thickness and SAAID correlated with age, gender, and different body sites. MPM could also assess the degree of skin aging, which could guide the clinical treatment of patients with diffferent ages and genders in the above body sites. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10156995/ /pubmed/37231920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13340 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chen, Ke‐Jun
Wang, Zi‐Yi
Han, Yang
Cui, Yong
In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
title In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
title_full In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
title_fullStr In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
title_full_unstemmed In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
title_short In vivo detection of healthy skin: Comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
title_sort in vivo detection of healthy skin: comparison of multiphoton microscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37231920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13340
work_keys_str_mv AT chenkejun invivodetectionofhealthyskincomparisonofmultiphotonmicroscopyandreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT wangziyi invivodetectionofhealthyskincomparisonofmultiphotonmicroscopyandreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT hanyang invivodetectionofhealthyskincomparisonofmultiphotonmicroscopyandreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT cuiyong invivodetectionofhealthyskincomparisonofmultiphotonmicroscopyandreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy