Cargando…
Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) has become an important biomarker for neuropathy diagnosis and research. The consequences of reduced IENFD can include sensory dysfunction, pain, and a significant decrease in quality of life. We examined the extent to which IENFD is being used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1161077 |
_version_ | 1785036694556246016 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Sarah Enders, Jonathan Kaiser, Andrew Rovenstine, Luke Heslop, Lana Hauser, Will Chadwick, Andrea Wright, Douglas |
author_facet | Thomas, Sarah Enders, Jonathan Kaiser, Andrew Rovenstine, Luke Heslop, Lana Hauser, Will Chadwick, Andrea Wright, Douglas |
author_sort | Thomas, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) has become an important biomarker for neuropathy diagnosis and research. The consequences of reduced IENFD can include sensory dysfunction, pain, and a significant decrease in quality of life. We examined the extent to which IENFD is being used as a tool in human and mouse models and compared the degree of fiber loss between diseases to gain a broader understanding of the existing data collected using this common technique. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of publications that used IENFD as a biomarker in human and non-human research. PubMed was used to identify 1,004 initial articles that were then screened to select articles that met the criteria for inclusion. Criteria were chosen to standardize publications so they could be compared rigorously and included having a control group, measuring IENFD in a distal limb, and using protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5). RESULTS: We analyzed 397 articles and collected information related to publication year, the condition studied, and the percent IENFD loss. The analysis revealed that the use of IENFD as a tool has been increasing in both human and non-human research. We found that IENFD loss is prevalent in many diseases, and metabolic or diabetes-related diseases were the most studied conditions in humans and rodents. Our analysis identified 73 human diseases in which IENFD was affected, with 71 reporting IENFD loss and an overall average IENFD change of −47%. We identified 28 mouse and 21 rat conditions, with average IENFD changes of −31.6% and −34.7%, respectively. Additionally, we present data describing sub-analyses of IENFD loss according to disease characteristics in diabetes and chemotherapy treatments in humans and rodents. INTERPRETATION: Reduced IENFD occurs in a surprising number of human disease conditions. Abnormal IENFD contributes to important complications, including poor cutaneous vascularization, sensory dysfunction, and pain. Our analysis informs future rodent studies so they may better mirror human diseases impacted by reduced IENFD, highlights the breadth of diseases impacted by IENFD loss, and urges exploration of common mechanisms that lead to substantial IENFD loss as a complication in disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10157176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101571762023-05-05 Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review Thomas, Sarah Enders, Jonathan Kaiser, Andrew Rovenstine, Luke Heslop, Lana Hauser, Will Chadwick, Andrea Wright, Douglas Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) has become an important biomarker for neuropathy diagnosis and research. The consequences of reduced IENFD can include sensory dysfunction, pain, and a significant decrease in quality of life. We examined the extent to which IENFD is being used as a tool in human and mouse models and compared the degree of fiber loss between diseases to gain a broader understanding of the existing data collected using this common technique. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of publications that used IENFD as a biomarker in human and non-human research. PubMed was used to identify 1,004 initial articles that were then screened to select articles that met the criteria for inclusion. Criteria were chosen to standardize publications so they could be compared rigorously and included having a control group, measuring IENFD in a distal limb, and using protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5). RESULTS: We analyzed 397 articles and collected information related to publication year, the condition studied, and the percent IENFD loss. The analysis revealed that the use of IENFD as a tool has been increasing in both human and non-human research. We found that IENFD loss is prevalent in many diseases, and metabolic or diabetes-related diseases were the most studied conditions in humans and rodents. Our analysis identified 73 human diseases in which IENFD was affected, with 71 reporting IENFD loss and an overall average IENFD change of −47%. We identified 28 mouse and 21 rat conditions, with average IENFD changes of −31.6% and −34.7%, respectively. Additionally, we present data describing sub-analyses of IENFD loss according to disease characteristics in diabetes and chemotherapy treatments in humans and rodents. INTERPRETATION: Reduced IENFD occurs in a surprising number of human disease conditions. Abnormal IENFD contributes to important complications, including poor cutaneous vascularization, sensory dysfunction, and pain. Our analysis informs future rodent studies so they may better mirror human diseases impacted by reduced IENFD, highlights the breadth of diseases impacted by IENFD loss, and urges exploration of common mechanisms that lead to substantial IENFD loss as a complication in disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10157176/ /pubmed/37153658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1161077 Text en Copyright © 2023 Thomas, Enders, Kaiser, Rovenstine, Heslop, Hauser, Chadwick and Wright. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Thomas, Sarah Enders, Jonathan Kaiser, Andrew Rovenstine, Luke Heslop, Lana Hauser, Will Chadwick, Andrea Wright, Douglas Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review |
title | Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review |
title_full | Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review |
title_short | Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review |
title_sort | abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: a scoping review |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1161077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomassarah abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT endersjonathan abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT kaiserandrew abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT rovenstineluke abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT hesloplana abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT hauserwill abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT chadwickandrea abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview AT wrightdouglas abnormalintraepidermalnervefiberdensityindiseaseascopingreview |