Cargando…
An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system to all patients who underwent trachelectomy in our previous study and to update the oncologic and obstetric results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in whom a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e41 |
_version_ | 1785036732664643584 |
---|---|
author | Okugawa, Kaoru Yahata, Hideaki Ohgami, Tatsuhiro Yasunaga, Masafumi Asanoma, Kazuo Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kato, Kiyoko |
author_facet | Okugawa, Kaoru Yahata, Hideaki Ohgami, Tatsuhiro Yasunaga, Masafumi Asanoma, Kazuo Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kato, Kiyoko |
author_sort | Okugawa, Kaoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system to all patients who underwent trachelectomy in our previous study and to update the oncologic and obstetric results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in whom abdominal trachelectomy was attempted between June 2005 and September 2021. The FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer was applied to all patients. RESULTS: Abdominal trachelectomy was attempted for 265 patients. Trachelectomy was converted to hysterectomy in 35 patients, and trachelectomy was completed successfully in 230 (conversion rate: 13%). Applying the FIGO 2018 staging system, 40% of the patients who underwent radical trachelectomy had stage IA tumors. Among 71 patients who had tumors measuring ≥2 cm, 8 patients were classified as stage IA1 and 14 as stage IA2. Overall recurrence and mortality rates were 2.2% and 1.3%, respectively. One hundred twelve patients attempted to conceive after trachelectomy; 69 pregnancies were achieved in 46 patients (pregnancy rate: 41%). Twenty-three pregnancies ended in first-trimester miscarriage, and 41 infants were delivered between gestational weeks 23 and 37; 16 were deliveries at term (39%) and 25 were premature deliveries (61%). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that patients judged to be ineligible for trachelectomy and patients receiving overtreatment will continue to appear using the current standard eligibility criteria. With the revisions to the FIGO 2018 staging system, the preoperative eligibility criteria for trachelectomy, which were based on the FIGO 2009 staging system and tumor size, should be changed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10157343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101573432023-05-05 An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis Okugawa, Kaoru Yahata, Hideaki Ohgami, Tatsuhiro Yasunaga, Masafumi Asanoma, Kazuo Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kato, Kiyoko J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system to all patients who underwent trachelectomy in our previous study and to update the oncologic and obstetric results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in whom abdominal trachelectomy was attempted between June 2005 and September 2021. The FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer was applied to all patients. RESULTS: Abdominal trachelectomy was attempted for 265 patients. Trachelectomy was converted to hysterectomy in 35 patients, and trachelectomy was completed successfully in 230 (conversion rate: 13%). Applying the FIGO 2018 staging system, 40% of the patients who underwent radical trachelectomy had stage IA tumors. Among 71 patients who had tumors measuring ≥2 cm, 8 patients were classified as stage IA1 and 14 as stage IA2. Overall recurrence and mortality rates were 2.2% and 1.3%, respectively. One hundred twelve patients attempted to conceive after trachelectomy; 69 pregnancies were achieved in 46 patients (pregnancy rate: 41%). Twenty-three pregnancies ended in first-trimester miscarriage, and 41 infants were delivered between gestational weeks 23 and 37; 16 were deliveries at term (39%) and 25 were premature deliveries (61%). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that patients judged to be ineligible for trachelectomy and patients receiving overtreatment will continue to appear using the current standard eligibility criteria. With the revisions to the FIGO 2018 staging system, the preoperative eligibility criteria for trachelectomy, which were based on the FIGO 2009 staging system and tumor size, should be changed. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10157343/ /pubmed/36807744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e41 Text en © 2023. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Okugawa, Kaoru Yahata, Hideaki Ohgami, Tatsuhiro Yasunaga, Masafumi Asanoma, Kazuo Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kato, Kiyoko An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
title | An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
title_full | An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
title_short | An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
title_sort | update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the figo 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okugawakaoru anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT yahatahideaki anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT ohgamitatsuhiro anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT yasunagamasafumi anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT asanomakazuo anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT kobayashihiroaki anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT katokiyoko anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT okugawakaoru updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT yahatahideaki updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT ohgamitatsuhiro updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT yasunagamasafumi updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT asanomakazuo updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT kobayashihiroaki updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis AT katokiyoko updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis |