Cargando…

An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system to all patients who underwent trachelectomy in our previous study and to update the oncologic and obstetric results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in whom a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okugawa, Kaoru, Yahata, Hideaki, Ohgami, Tatsuhiro, Yasunaga, Masafumi, Asanoma, Kazuo, Kobayashi, Hiroaki, Kato, Kiyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e41
_version_ 1785036732664643584
author Okugawa, Kaoru
Yahata, Hideaki
Ohgami, Tatsuhiro
Yasunaga, Masafumi
Asanoma, Kazuo
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Kato, Kiyoko
author_facet Okugawa, Kaoru
Yahata, Hideaki
Ohgami, Tatsuhiro
Yasunaga, Masafumi
Asanoma, Kazuo
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Kato, Kiyoko
author_sort Okugawa, Kaoru
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system to all patients who underwent trachelectomy in our previous study and to update the oncologic and obstetric results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in whom abdominal trachelectomy was attempted between June 2005 and September 2021. The FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer was applied to all patients. RESULTS: Abdominal trachelectomy was attempted for 265 patients. Trachelectomy was converted to hysterectomy in 35 patients, and trachelectomy was completed successfully in 230 (conversion rate: 13%). Applying the FIGO 2018 staging system, 40% of the patients who underwent radical trachelectomy had stage IA tumors. Among 71 patients who had tumors measuring ≥2 cm, 8 patients were classified as stage IA1 and 14 as stage IA2. Overall recurrence and mortality rates were 2.2% and 1.3%, respectively. One hundred twelve patients attempted to conceive after trachelectomy; 69 pregnancies were achieved in 46 patients (pregnancy rate: 41%). Twenty-three pregnancies ended in first-trimester miscarriage, and 41 infants were delivered between gestational weeks 23 and 37; 16 were deliveries at term (39%) and 25 were premature deliveries (61%). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that patients judged to be ineligible for trachelectomy and patients receiving overtreatment will continue to appear using the current standard eligibility criteria. With the revisions to the FIGO 2018 staging system, the preoperative eligibility criteria for trachelectomy, which were based on the FIGO 2009 staging system and tumor size, should be changed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10157343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101573432023-05-05 An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis Okugawa, Kaoru Yahata, Hideaki Ohgami, Tatsuhiro Yasunaga, Masafumi Asanoma, Kazuo Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kato, Kiyoko J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system to all patients who underwent trachelectomy in our previous study and to update the oncologic and obstetric results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients in whom abdominal trachelectomy was attempted between June 2005 and September 2021. The FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer was applied to all patients. RESULTS: Abdominal trachelectomy was attempted for 265 patients. Trachelectomy was converted to hysterectomy in 35 patients, and trachelectomy was completed successfully in 230 (conversion rate: 13%). Applying the FIGO 2018 staging system, 40% of the patients who underwent radical trachelectomy had stage IA tumors. Among 71 patients who had tumors measuring ≥2 cm, 8 patients were classified as stage IA1 and 14 as stage IA2. Overall recurrence and mortality rates were 2.2% and 1.3%, respectively. One hundred twelve patients attempted to conceive after trachelectomy; 69 pregnancies were achieved in 46 patients (pregnancy rate: 41%). Twenty-three pregnancies ended in first-trimester miscarriage, and 41 infants were delivered between gestational weeks 23 and 37; 16 were deliveries at term (39%) and 25 were premature deliveries (61%). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that patients judged to be ineligible for trachelectomy and patients receiving overtreatment will continue to appear using the current standard eligibility criteria. With the revisions to the FIGO 2018 staging system, the preoperative eligibility criteria for trachelectomy, which were based on the FIGO 2009 staging system and tumor size, should be changed. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10157343/ /pubmed/36807744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e41 Text en © 2023. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Okugawa, Kaoru
Yahata, Hideaki
Ohgami, Tatsuhiro
Yasunaga, Masafumi
Asanoma, Kazuo
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Kato, Kiyoko
An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
title An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
title_full An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
title_fullStr An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
title_short An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
title_sort update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the figo 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e41
work_keys_str_mv AT okugawakaoru anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT yahatahideaki anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT ohgamitatsuhiro anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT yasunagamasafumi anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT asanomakazuo anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT kobayashihiroaki anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT katokiyoko anupdateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT okugawakaoru updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT yahatahideaki updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT ohgamitatsuhiro updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT yasunagamasafumi updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT asanomakazuo updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT kobayashihiroaki updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis
AT katokiyoko updateofoncologicandobstetricoutcomesafterabdominaltrachelectomyusingthefigo2018stagingsystemforcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionretrospectiveanalysis