Cargando…

Incidence of biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) in South Australia 2014–2020

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of biopsy proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) in South Australia. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven GCA were identified from pathology reports of temporal artery biopsies at state-based pathology laboratories, from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. Incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ninan, Jem, Ruediger, Carlee, Dyer, Kathryn A., Dodd, Thomas, Black, Rachel J., Lyne, Suellen, Shanahan, Ernst M., Proudman, Susanna M., Lester, Susan, McNeil, Julian, Hill, Catherine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1173256
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of biopsy proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) in South Australia. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven GCA were identified from pathology reports of temporal artery biopsies at state-based pathology laboratories, from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. Incidence rates for biopsy-proven GCA were calculated using Australian Bureau of Statistics data for South Australian population sizes by age, sex, and calendar year. Seasonality was analyzed by cosinor analysis. RESULTS: There were 181 cases of biopsy-proven GCA. The median age at diagnosis of GCA was 76 years (IQR 70, 81), 64% were female. The estimated population incidence for people over 50 was 5.4 (95% CI 4.7, 6.1) per 100,000-person years. The female: male incidence ratio was 1.6 (95% CI 1.2, 2.2). There was no ordinal trend in GCA incidence rates by calendar year (p = 0.29). The incidence was, on average, highest in winter, but not significantly (p = 0.35). A cosinor analysis indicated no seasonal effect (p = 0.52). CONCLUSION: The incidence of biopsy-proven GCA remains low in Australia. A higher incidence was noted compared to an earlier study. However, differences in ascertainment and methods of GCA diagnosis may have accounted for the change.