Cargando…

Quantitative Analysis of Deformity in Digital Model of Congenital Radioulnar Synostosis

OBJECTIVE: The deformity of congenital radioulnar synostosis is quite complicated and difficult. This study aims to find out the related factors of the “forearm rotation angle” (FR) which relate to the severity of congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS), and try to quantify the internal relations of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Chen, Liu, Lu, Wei, Qipei, Bai, Fan, Chen, Shanlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13701
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The deformity of congenital radioulnar synostosis is quite complicated and difficult. This study aims to find out the related factors of the “forearm rotation angle” (FR) which relate to the severity of congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS), and try to quantify the internal relations of each deformity and help to understand the reconstruction method in surgery treatment of this disease. METHODS: This study is case series research. We established 48 digital three‐dimensional forearm bone models of 48 patients with congenital radioulnar synostosis classified as Cleary and Omer type 3. All the patients were treated at our institution from January 2010 to June 2016. In total, 10 independent deformities (the rotation angle of forearm; the internal rotation, radial, and dorsal angulation of radius and ulna; the relative length of osseous fusion at PRUJ; the relative dislocation distance of distal radioulnar joint; the relative area of proximal radial epiphysis) involved in the CRUS complex deformity were measured. Pearson correlation analysis for each deformity which was mentioned above was performed, and multivariate linear regression analysis was also performed with FR as the dependent variable and the other deformities as the influential factors. RESULTS: The “dorsal angle of radius” (DAR, 21.69° ± 21.55°) had the strongest correlation with the FR (79.72° ± 40.39°), the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.601 (p < 0.01), the internal rotation angle of the radius (IRAR, 82.69° ± 54.98°) had a moderate correlation with FR, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.552 (p < 0.01). A forearm deformity equation was established: FR = 35.896 + 0.271 DAR + 0.989 IRAR. CONCLUSION: The dorsal angulation deformity of radius may be the most important deformity that effects the severity of CRUS and should be correct in the first place during reconstruction operation.