Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) has been recommended for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) of health-related quality of life. This study compared the content, validity, and reliability of seven PROMIS CATs to the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Willik, Esmee M, van Breda, Fenna, van Jaarsveld, Brigit C, van de Putte, Marlon, Jetten, Isabelle W, Dekker, Friedo W, Meuleman, Yvette, van Ittersum, Frans J, Terwee, Caroline B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac231
_version_ 1785036822055747584
author van der Willik, Esmee M
van Breda, Fenna
van Jaarsveld, Brigit C
van de Putte, Marlon
Jetten, Isabelle W
Dekker, Friedo W
Meuleman, Yvette
van Ittersum, Frans J
Terwee, Caroline B
author_facet van der Willik, Esmee M
van Breda, Fenna
van Jaarsveld, Brigit C
van de Putte, Marlon
Jetten, Isabelle W
Dekker, Friedo W
Meuleman, Yvette
van Ittersum, Frans J
Terwee, Caroline B
author_sort van der Willik, Esmee M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) has been recommended for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) of health-related quality of life. This study compared the content, validity, and reliability of seven PROMIS CATs to the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: Adult patients with chronic kidney disease and an estimated glomerular filtration rate under 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) who were not receiving dialysis treatment completed seven PROMIS CATs (assessing physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and the ability to participate in social roles and activities), the SF-12, and the PROMIS Pain Intensity single item and Dialysis Symptom Index at inclusion and 2 weeks. A content comparison was performed between PROMIS CATs and the SF-12. Construct validity of PROMIS CATs was assessed using Pearson's correlations. We assessed the test-retest reliability of all patient-reported outcome measures by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient and minimal detectable change. RESULTS: In total, 207 patients participated in the study. A median of 45 items (10 minutes) were completed for PROMIS CATs. All PROMIS CATs showed evidence of sufficient construct validity. PROMIS CATs, most SF-12 domains and summary scores, and Dialysis Symptom Index showed sufficient test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.70). PROMIS CATs had a lower minimal detectable change compared with the SF-12 (range, 5.7–7.4 compared with 11.3–21.7 across domains, respectively). CONCLUSION: PROMIS CATs showed sufficient construct validity and test-retest reliability in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. PROMIS CATs required more items but showed better reliability than the SF-12. Future research is needed to investigate the feasibility of PROMIS CATs for routine nephrology care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10157750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101577502023-05-05 Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease van der Willik, Esmee M van Breda, Fenna van Jaarsveld, Brigit C van de Putte, Marlon Jetten, Isabelle W Dekker, Friedo W Meuleman, Yvette van Ittersum, Frans J Terwee, Caroline B Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Article BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) has been recommended for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) of health-related quality of life. This study compared the content, validity, and reliability of seven PROMIS CATs to the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: Adult patients with chronic kidney disease and an estimated glomerular filtration rate under 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) who were not receiving dialysis treatment completed seven PROMIS CATs (assessing physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and the ability to participate in social roles and activities), the SF-12, and the PROMIS Pain Intensity single item and Dialysis Symptom Index at inclusion and 2 weeks. A content comparison was performed between PROMIS CATs and the SF-12. Construct validity of PROMIS CATs was assessed using Pearson's correlations. We assessed the test-retest reliability of all patient-reported outcome measures by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient and minimal detectable change. RESULTS: In total, 207 patients participated in the study. A median of 45 items (10 minutes) were completed for PROMIS CATs. All PROMIS CATs showed evidence of sufficient construct validity. PROMIS CATs, most SF-12 domains and summary scores, and Dialysis Symptom Index showed sufficient test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.70). PROMIS CATs had a lower minimal detectable change compared with the SF-12 (range, 5.7–7.4 compared with 11.3–21.7 across domains, respectively). CONCLUSION: PROMIS CATs showed sufficient construct validity and test-retest reliability in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. PROMIS CATs required more items but showed better reliability than the SF-12. Future research is needed to investigate the feasibility of PROMIS CATs for routine nephrology care. Oxford University Press 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10157750/ /pubmed/35913734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac231 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
van der Willik, Esmee M
van Breda, Fenna
van Jaarsveld, Brigit C
van de Putte, Marlon
Jetten, Isabelle W
Dekker, Friedo W
Meuleman, Yvette
van Ittersum, Frans J
Terwee, Caroline B
Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
title Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_full Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_short Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
title_sort validity and reliability of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (promis(®)) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac231
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderwillikesmeem validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT vanbredafenna validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT vanjaarsveldbrigitc validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT vandeputtemarlon validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT jettenisabellew validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT dekkerfriedow validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT meulemanyvette validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT vanittersumfransj validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease
AT terweecarolineb validityandreliabilityofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisusingcomputerizedadaptivetestinginpatientswithadvancedchronickidneydisease