Cargando…
Designing Effective Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces: Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature
[Image: see text] Research into nanostructured materials, inspired by the topography of certain insect wings, has provided a potential pathway toward drug-free antibacterial surfaces, which may be vital in the ongoing battle against antimicrobial resistance. However, to produce viable antibacterial...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08068 |
_version_ | 1785036841187016704 |
---|---|
author | Catley, Thomas E. Corrigan, Rebecca M. Parnell, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Catley, Thomas E. Corrigan, Rebecca M. Parnell, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Catley, Thomas E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Research into nanostructured materials, inspired by the topography of certain insect wings, has provided a potential pathway toward drug-free antibacterial surfaces, which may be vital in the ongoing battle against antimicrobial resistance. However, to produce viable antibacterial nanostructured surfaces, we must first understand the bactericidal mechanism of action and how to optimize them to kill the widest range of microorganisms. This review discusses the parameters of nanostructured surfaces that have been shown to influence their bactericidal efficiency and highlights the highly variable nature of many of the findings. A large-scale analysis of the literature is also presented, which further shows a lack of clarity in what is understood about the factors influencing bactericidal efficiency. The potential reasons for the ambiguity, including how the killing effect may be a result of multiple factors and issues with nonstandardized testing of the antibacterial properties of nanostructured surfaces, are then discussed. Finally, a standard method for testing of antimicrobial killing is proposed that will allow comparison between studies and enable a deeper understanding about nanostructured surfaces and how to optimize their bactericidal efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10157858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101578582023-05-05 Designing Effective Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces: Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature Catley, Thomas E. Corrigan, Rebecca M. Parnell, Andrew J. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Research into nanostructured materials, inspired by the topography of certain insect wings, has provided a potential pathway toward drug-free antibacterial surfaces, which may be vital in the ongoing battle against antimicrobial resistance. However, to produce viable antibacterial nanostructured surfaces, we must first understand the bactericidal mechanism of action and how to optimize them to kill the widest range of microorganisms. This review discusses the parameters of nanostructured surfaces that have been shown to influence their bactericidal efficiency and highlights the highly variable nature of many of the findings. A large-scale analysis of the literature is also presented, which further shows a lack of clarity in what is understood about the factors influencing bactericidal efficiency. The potential reasons for the ambiguity, including how the killing effect may be a result of multiple factors and issues with nonstandardized testing of the antibacterial properties of nanostructured surfaces, are then discussed. Finally, a standard method for testing of antimicrobial killing is proposed that will allow comparison between studies and enable a deeper understanding about nanostructured surfaces and how to optimize their bactericidal efficiency. American Chemical Society 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10157858/ /pubmed/37151499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08068 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Catley, Thomas E. Corrigan, Rebecca M. Parnell, Andrew J. Designing Effective Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces: Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature |
title | Designing Effective
Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces:
Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature |
title_full | Designing Effective
Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces:
Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature |
title_fullStr | Designing Effective
Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces:
Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Designing Effective
Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces:
Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature |
title_short | Designing Effective
Antimicrobial Nanostructured Surfaces:
Highlighting the Lack of Consensus in the Literature |
title_sort | designing effective
antimicrobial nanostructured surfaces:
highlighting the lack of consensus in the literature |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT catleythomase designingeffectiveantimicrobialnanostructuredsurfaceshighlightingthelackofconsensusintheliterature AT corriganrebeccam designingeffectiveantimicrobialnanostructuredsurfaceshighlightingthelackofconsensusintheliterature AT parnellandrewj designingeffectiveantimicrobialnanostructuredsurfaceshighlightingthelackofconsensusintheliterature |