Cargando…

Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Only a small number of studies have reported the use of progesterone vaginal gel in combination with dydrogesterone as part of the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes follow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De, Minji, Chen, Lixue, Zeng, Lin, Wang, Yang, Yang, Rui, Li, Rong, Chi, Hongbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05570-0
_version_ 1785036872408367104
author De, Minji
Chen, Lixue
Zeng, Lin
Wang, Yang
Yang, Rui
Li, Rong
Chi, Hongbin
author_facet De, Minji
Chen, Lixue
Zeng, Lin
Wang, Yang
Yang, Rui
Li, Rong
Chi, Hongbin
author_sort De, Minji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Only a small number of studies have reported the use of progesterone vaginal gel in combination with dydrogesterone as part of the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from infertile patients who underwent fresh embryo transfer via the antagonist protocol (2785 cycles) between February and July 2019 and between February and July 2021 at the Peking University Third Hospital Reproductive Medicine Centre. According to the luteal support received, the cycle groups were divided into the progesterone vaginal gel group (single medication or VP group; 1170 cycles) and the progesterone vaginal gel plus dydrogesterone group (combination medication or DYD + VP group; 1615 cycles). After propensity score matching, the clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, early miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 1057 pairs of cycles were successfully matched via propensity scores. The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in the combination medication group were significantly higher than those in the single medication group (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were noted in the early miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates between the two groups (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined luteal support after the antagonist protocol is preferred for patients undergoing fresh cycle embryo transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101580072023-05-05 Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study De, Minji Chen, Lixue Zeng, Lin Wang, Yang Yang, Rui Li, Rong Chi, Hongbin BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Only a small number of studies have reported the use of progesterone vaginal gel in combination with dydrogesterone as part of the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from infertile patients who underwent fresh embryo transfer via the antagonist protocol (2785 cycles) between February and July 2019 and between February and July 2021 at the Peking University Third Hospital Reproductive Medicine Centre. According to the luteal support received, the cycle groups were divided into the progesterone vaginal gel group (single medication or VP group; 1170 cycles) and the progesterone vaginal gel plus dydrogesterone group (combination medication or DYD + VP group; 1615 cycles). After propensity score matching, the clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, early miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 1057 pairs of cycles were successfully matched via propensity scores. The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in the combination medication group were significantly higher than those in the single medication group (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were noted in the early miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates between the two groups (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined luteal support after the antagonist protocol is preferred for patients undergoing fresh cycle embryo transfer. BioMed Central 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10158007/ /pubmed/37142960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05570-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
De, Minji
Chen, Lixue
Zeng, Lin
Wang, Yang
Yang, Rui
Li, Rong
Chi, Hongbin
Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_full Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_short Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
title_sort effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05570-0
work_keys_str_mv AT deminji effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT chenlixue effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT zenglin effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT wangyang effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT yangrui effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT lirong effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy
AT chihongbin effectsoftwodifferenttypesoflutealsupportonpregnancyoutcomesfollowingantagonistfreshembryotransferaretrospectivestudy