Cargando…

Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review

The introduction of skeletal anchorage utilized for maxillary protraction with a face mask or class III elastics has been developed for the management of class III malocclusions with minimal dental effect. The objective of the present review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding airway dime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adel, Samar M., Abbas, Bassant A., Marzouk, Wessam W., Zaher, Abbas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02940-0
_version_ 1785036891538587648
author Adel, Samar M.
Abbas, Bassant A.
Marzouk, Wessam W.
Zaher, Abbas R.
author_facet Adel, Samar M.
Abbas, Bassant A.
Marzouk, Wessam W.
Zaher, Abbas R.
author_sort Adel, Samar M.
collection PubMed
description The introduction of skeletal anchorage utilized for maxillary protraction with a face mask or class III elastics has been developed for the management of class III malocclusions with minimal dental effect. The objective of the present review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding airway dimensional changes following bone-anchored maxillary protraction. A search was conducted by two authors (S.A & B.A) in the following databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Open Grey; besides a hand search in references of selected articles and developing a search alert in electronic databases. Selection criteria comprised randomized as well as prospective clinical trials evaluating airway dimensional changes following bone-anchored maxillary protraction. Relevant data were extracted after studies retrieval and selection. The risk of bias was thereafter evaluated using the revised RoB 2 tool for randomized clinical trials and the ROBINS-I tool was used for non-randomized clinical trials. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified Jadad score. After examining (eligibility) full-text articles, four clinical trials were ultimately included. These studies evaluated the airway dimensional changes, following bone-anchored maxillary protraction in comparison to different control study groups. Based on the available evidence, all the bone-anchored maxillary protraction devices used in the eligible studies in the present systematic review resulted in an improvement in the airway dimensions. However, due to the few numbers of studies available and the guarded evidence due to the low quality of evidence of three out of four included articles, there is no strong evidence to support a significant increase in the airway dimensions following bone-anchored maxillary protraction. Therefore, there is a need for more randomized controlled clinical trials with similar bone-anchored protraction devices and similar assessment methods for more valid comparisons, excluding any confounding factors, on airway dimensional changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101582212023-05-05 Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review Adel, Samar M. Abbas, Bassant A. Marzouk, Wessam W. Zaher, Abbas R. BMC Oral Health Research The introduction of skeletal anchorage utilized for maxillary protraction with a face mask or class III elastics has been developed for the management of class III malocclusions with minimal dental effect. The objective of the present review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding airway dimensional changes following bone-anchored maxillary protraction. A search was conducted by two authors (S.A & B.A) in the following databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Open Grey; besides a hand search in references of selected articles and developing a search alert in electronic databases. Selection criteria comprised randomized as well as prospective clinical trials evaluating airway dimensional changes following bone-anchored maxillary protraction. Relevant data were extracted after studies retrieval and selection. The risk of bias was thereafter evaluated using the revised RoB 2 tool for randomized clinical trials and the ROBINS-I tool was used for non-randomized clinical trials. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified Jadad score. After examining (eligibility) full-text articles, four clinical trials were ultimately included. These studies evaluated the airway dimensional changes, following bone-anchored maxillary protraction in comparison to different control study groups. Based on the available evidence, all the bone-anchored maxillary protraction devices used in the eligible studies in the present systematic review resulted in an improvement in the airway dimensions. However, due to the few numbers of studies available and the guarded evidence due to the low quality of evidence of three out of four included articles, there is no strong evidence to support a significant increase in the airway dimensions following bone-anchored maxillary protraction. Therefore, there is a need for more randomized controlled clinical trials with similar bone-anchored protraction devices and similar assessment methods for more valid comparisons, excluding any confounding factors, on airway dimensional changes. BioMed Central 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10158221/ /pubmed/37138306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02940-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Adel, Samar M.
Abbas, Bassant A.
Marzouk, Wessam W.
Zaher, Abbas R.
Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
title Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
title_full Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
title_fullStr Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
title_short Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
title_sort airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02940-0
work_keys_str_mv AT adelsamarm airwaydimensionalchangesfollowingboneanchoredmaxillaryprotractionasystematicreview
AT abbasbassanta airwaydimensionalchangesfollowingboneanchoredmaxillaryprotractionasystematicreview
AT marzoukwessamw airwaydimensionalchangesfollowingboneanchoredmaxillaryprotractionasystematicreview
AT zaherabbasr airwaydimensionalchangesfollowingboneanchoredmaxillaryprotractionasystematicreview