Cargando…

Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group

BACKGROUND: Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (1) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karschnia, Philipp, Young, Jacob S, Dono, Antonio, Häni, Levin, Sciortino, Tommaso, Bruno, Francesco, Juenger, Stephanie T, Teske, Nico, Morshed, Ramin A, Haddad, Alexander F, Zhang, Yalan, Stoecklein, Sophia, Weller, Michael, Vogelbaum, Michael A, Beck, Juergen, Tandon, Nitin, Hervey-Jumper, Shawn, Molinaro, Annette M, Rudà, Roberta, Bello, Lorenzo, Schnell, Oliver, Esquenazi, Yoshua, Ruge, Maximilian I, Grau, Stefan J, Berger, Mitchel S, Chang, Susan M, van den Bent, Martin, Tonn, Joerg-Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35961053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac193
_version_ 1785036898012495872
author Karschnia, Philipp
Young, Jacob S
Dono, Antonio
Häni, Levin
Sciortino, Tommaso
Bruno, Francesco
Juenger, Stephanie T
Teske, Nico
Morshed, Ramin A
Haddad, Alexander F
Zhang, Yalan
Stoecklein, Sophia
Weller, Michael
Vogelbaum, Michael A
Beck, Juergen
Tandon, Nitin
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn
Molinaro, Annette M
Rudà, Roberta
Bello, Lorenzo
Schnell, Oliver
Esquenazi, Yoshua
Ruge, Maximilian I
Grau, Stefan J
Berger, Mitchel S
Chang, Susan M
van den Bent, Martin
Tonn, Joerg-Christian
author_facet Karschnia, Philipp
Young, Jacob S
Dono, Antonio
Häni, Levin
Sciortino, Tommaso
Bruno, Francesco
Juenger, Stephanie T
Teske, Nico
Morshed, Ramin A
Haddad, Alexander F
Zhang, Yalan
Stoecklein, Sophia
Weller, Michael
Vogelbaum, Michael A
Beck, Juergen
Tandon, Nitin
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn
Molinaro, Annette M
Rudà, Roberta
Bello, Lorenzo
Schnell, Oliver
Esquenazi, Yoshua
Ruge, Maximilian I
Grau, Stefan J
Berger, Mitchel S
Chang, Susan M
van den Bent, Martin
Tonn, Joerg-Christian
author_sort Karschnia, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (1) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and (2) define how much removed non-CE tumor translates into a survival benefit. METHODS: The international RANO resect group retrospectively searched previously compiled databases from 7 neuro-oncological centers in the USA and Europe for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. Clinical and volumetric information from pre- and postoperative MRI were collected. RESULTS: We collected 1,008 patients with newly diagnosed IDHwt glioblastoma. 744 IDHwt glioblastomas were treated with radiochemotherapy per EORTC-26981/22981 (TMZ/RT→TMZ) following surgery. Among these homogenously treated patients, lower absolute residual tumor volumes (in cm(3)) were favorably associated with outcome: patients with “maximal CE resection” (class 2) had superior outcome compared to patients with “submaximal CE resection” (class 3) or “biopsy” (class 4). Extensive resection of non-CE tumor (≤5 cm(3) residual non-CE tumor) was associated with better survival among patients with complete CE resection, thus defining class 1 (“supramaximal CE resection”). The prognostic value of the resection classes was retained on multivariate analysis when adjusting for molecular and clinical markers. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed “RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma” are highly prognostic and may serve for stratification within clinical trials. Removal of non-CE tumor beyond the CE tumor borders may translate into additional survival benefit, providing a rationale to explicitly denominate such “supramaximal CE resection.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101582812023-05-05 Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group Karschnia, Philipp Young, Jacob S Dono, Antonio Häni, Levin Sciortino, Tommaso Bruno, Francesco Juenger, Stephanie T Teske, Nico Morshed, Ramin A Haddad, Alexander F Zhang, Yalan Stoecklein, Sophia Weller, Michael Vogelbaum, Michael A Beck, Juergen Tandon, Nitin Hervey-Jumper, Shawn Molinaro, Annette M Rudà, Roberta Bello, Lorenzo Schnell, Oliver Esquenazi, Yoshua Ruge, Maximilian I Grau, Stefan J Berger, Mitchel S Chang, Susan M van den Bent, Martin Tonn, Joerg-Christian Neuro Oncol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (1) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and (2) define how much removed non-CE tumor translates into a survival benefit. METHODS: The international RANO resect group retrospectively searched previously compiled databases from 7 neuro-oncological centers in the USA and Europe for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. Clinical and volumetric information from pre- and postoperative MRI were collected. RESULTS: We collected 1,008 patients with newly diagnosed IDHwt glioblastoma. 744 IDHwt glioblastomas were treated with radiochemotherapy per EORTC-26981/22981 (TMZ/RT→TMZ) following surgery. Among these homogenously treated patients, lower absolute residual tumor volumes (in cm(3)) were favorably associated with outcome: patients with “maximal CE resection” (class 2) had superior outcome compared to patients with “submaximal CE resection” (class 3) or “biopsy” (class 4). Extensive resection of non-CE tumor (≤5 cm(3) residual non-CE tumor) was associated with better survival among patients with complete CE resection, thus defining class 1 (“supramaximal CE resection”). The prognostic value of the resection classes was retained on multivariate analysis when adjusting for molecular and clinical markers. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed “RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma” are highly prognostic and may serve for stratification within clinical trials. Removal of non-CE tumor beyond the CE tumor borders may translate into additional survival benefit, providing a rationale to explicitly denominate such “supramaximal CE resection.” Oxford University Press 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10158281/ /pubmed/35961053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac193 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Karschnia, Philipp
Young, Jacob S
Dono, Antonio
Häni, Levin
Sciortino, Tommaso
Bruno, Francesco
Juenger, Stephanie T
Teske, Nico
Morshed, Ramin A
Haddad, Alexander F
Zhang, Yalan
Stoecklein, Sophia
Weller, Michael
Vogelbaum, Michael A
Beck, Juergen
Tandon, Nitin
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn
Molinaro, Annette M
Rudà, Roberta
Bello, Lorenzo
Schnell, Oliver
Esquenazi, Yoshua
Ruge, Maximilian I
Grau, Stefan J
Berger, Mitchel S
Chang, Susan M
van den Bent, Martin
Tonn, Joerg-Christian
Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group
title Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group
title_full Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group
title_fullStr Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group
title_short Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group
title_sort prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: a report of the rano resect group
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35961053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac193
work_keys_str_mv AT karschniaphilipp prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT youngjacobs prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT donoantonio prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT hanilevin prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT sciortinotommaso prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT brunofrancesco prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT juengerstephaniet prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT teskenico prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT morshedramina prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT haddadalexanderf prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT zhangyalan prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT stoeckleinsophia prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT wellermichael prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT vogelbaummichaela prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT beckjuergen prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT tandonnitin prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT herveyjumpershawn prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT molinaroannettem prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT rudaroberta prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT bellolorenzo prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT schnelloliver prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT esquenaziyoshua prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT rugemaximiliani prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT graustefanj prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT bergermitchels prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT changsusanm prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT vandenbentmartin prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup
AT tonnjoergchristian prognosticvalidationofanewclassificationsystemforextentofresectioninglioblastomaareportoftheranoresectgroup