Cargando…

Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions. Objec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubey, Ayushmaan, Tiwari, Anuj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618
_version_ 1785036955588755456
author Dubey, Ayushmaan
Tiwari, Anuj
author_facet Dubey, Ayushmaan
Tiwari, Anuj
author_sort Dubey, Ayushmaan
collection PubMed
description Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions. Objectives: Identify and summarize FDA approved RPM devices to provide information for the US medical device industry based on previous approvals and the markets’ needs. Methods: We searched publicly available databases on FDA-approved RPM devices. Selection criteria were established to classify a solution as AI. Technical information was analyzed on pre-identified 16 parameters for the qualified solutions. Results: A total of 47 RPM devices were reviewed, among which 12.8% were classified as a De Novo product and the remaining devices fell under the 510(K) FDA category. The cardiovascular (74%) AI RPM solutions dominated the US market, followed by ECG-based arrhythmia detection algorithms (59.4%), and Hemodynamics and Vital Sign monitoring algorithms (21.9%). The trend observed in the FDA rejected devices was their inability to be classified into clinically relevant categories (Criteria 2 and 3). Conclusion: The market needs more innovative RPM solutions under the De Novo category, as there are very few. The transparency is low on the technical aspect of AI algorithms. The market needs AI algorithms that can effectively classify patients rather than merely improve device functionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101585632023-05-05 Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review Dubey, Ayushmaan Tiwari, Anuj J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions. Objectives: Identify and summarize FDA approved RPM devices to provide information for the US medical device industry based on previous approvals and the markets’ needs. Methods: We searched publicly available databases on FDA-approved RPM devices. Selection criteria were established to classify a solution as AI. Technical information was analyzed on pre-identified 16 parameters for the qualified solutions. Results: A total of 47 RPM devices were reviewed, among which 12.8% were classified as a De Novo product and the remaining devices fell under the 510(K) FDA category. The cardiovascular (74%) AI RPM solutions dominated the US market, followed by ECG-based arrhythmia detection algorithms (59.4%), and Hemodynamics and Vital Sign monitoring algorithms (21.9%). The trend observed in the FDA rejected devices was their inability to be classified into clinically relevant categories (Criteria 2 and 3). Conclusion: The market needs more innovative RPM solutions under the De Novo category, as there are very few. The transparency is low on the technical aspect of AI algorithms. The market needs AI algorithms that can effectively classify patients rather than merely improve device functionality. Routledge 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10158563/ /pubmed/37151736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Dubey, Ayushmaan
Tiwari, Anuj
Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
title Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
title_full Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
title_short Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
title_sort artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in us healthcare market: a literature review
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618
work_keys_str_mv AT dubeyayushmaan artificialintelligenceandremotepatientmonitoringinushealthcaremarketaliteraturereview
AT tiwarianuj artificialintelligenceandremotepatientmonitoringinushealthcaremarketaliteraturereview