Cargando…
Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions. Objec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618 |
_version_ | 1785036955588755456 |
---|---|
author | Dubey, Ayushmaan Tiwari, Anuj |
author_facet | Dubey, Ayushmaan Tiwari, Anuj |
author_sort | Dubey, Ayushmaan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions. Objectives: Identify and summarize FDA approved RPM devices to provide information for the US medical device industry based on previous approvals and the markets’ needs. Methods: We searched publicly available databases on FDA-approved RPM devices. Selection criteria were established to classify a solution as AI. Technical information was analyzed on pre-identified 16 parameters for the qualified solutions. Results: A total of 47 RPM devices were reviewed, among which 12.8% were classified as a De Novo product and the remaining devices fell under the 510(K) FDA category. The cardiovascular (74%) AI RPM solutions dominated the US market, followed by ECG-based arrhythmia detection algorithms (59.4%), and Hemodynamics and Vital Sign monitoring algorithms (21.9%). The trend observed in the FDA rejected devices was their inability to be classified into clinically relevant categories (Criteria 2 and 3). Conclusion: The market needs more innovative RPM solutions under the De Novo category, as there are very few. The transparency is low on the technical aspect of AI algorithms. The market needs AI algorithms that can effectively classify patients rather than merely improve device functionality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10158563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101585632023-05-05 Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review Dubey, Ayushmaan Tiwari, Anuj J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions. Objectives: Identify and summarize FDA approved RPM devices to provide information for the US medical device industry based on previous approvals and the markets’ needs. Methods: We searched publicly available databases on FDA-approved RPM devices. Selection criteria were established to classify a solution as AI. Technical information was analyzed on pre-identified 16 parameters for the qualified solutions. Results: A total of 47 RPM devices were reviewed, among which 12.8% were classified as a De Novo product and the remaining devices fell under the 510(K) FDA category. The cardiovascular (74%) AI RPM solutions dominated the US market, followed by ECG-based arrhythmia detection algorithms (59.4%), and Hemodynamics and Vital Sign monitoring algorithms (21.9%). The trend observed in the FDA rejected devices was their inability to be classified into clinically relevant categories (Criteria 2 and 3). Conclusion: The market needs more innovative RPM solutions under the De Novo category, as there are very few. The transparency is low on the technical aspect of AI algorithms. The market needs AI algorithms that can effectively classify patients rather than merely improve device functionality. Routledge 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10158563/ /pubmed/37151736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Dubey, Ayushmaan Tiwari, Anuj Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review |
title | Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review |
title_full | Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review |
title_short | Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review |
title_sort | artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in us healthcare market: a literature review |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dubeyayushmaan artificialintelligenceandremotepatientmonitoringinushealthcaremarketaliteraturereview AT tiwarianuj artificialintelligenceandremotepatientmonitoringinushealthcaremarketaliteraturereview |