Cargando…

The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics

The ability to combine individual concepts of objects, properties, and actions into complex representations of the world is often associated with language. Yet combinatorial event-level representations can also be constructed from nonverbal input, such as visual scenes. Here, we test whether the lan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivanova, Anna A., Mineroff, Zachary, Zimmerer, Vitor, Kanwisher, Nancy, Varley, Rosemary, Fedorenko, Evelina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37216147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00030
_version_ 1785036961291960320
author Ivanova, Anna A.
Mineroff, Zachary
Zimmerer, Vitor
Kanwisher, Nancy
Varley, Rosemary
Fedorenko, Evelina
author_facet Ivanova, Anna A.
Mineroff, Zachary
Zimmerer, Vitor
Kanwisher, Nancy
Varley, Rosemary
Fedorenko, Evelina
author_sort Ivanova, Anna A.
collection PubMed
description The ability to combine individual concepts of objects, properties, and actions into complex representations of the world is often associated with language. Yet combinatorial event-level representations can also be constructed from nonverbal input, such as visual scenes. Here, we test whether the language network in the human brain is involved in and necessary for semantic processing of events presented nonverbally. In Experiment 1, we scanned participants with fMRI while they performed a semantic plausibility judgment task versus a difficult perceptual control task on sentences and line drawings that describe/depict simple agent–patient interactions. We found that the language network responded robustly during the semantic task performed on both sentences and pictures (although its response to sentences was stronger). Thus, language regions in healthy adults are engaged during a semantic task performed on pictorial depictions of events. But is this engagement necessary? In Experiment 2, we tested two individuals with global aphasia, who have sustained massive damage to perisylvian language areas and display severe language difficulties, against a group of age-matched control participants. Individuals with aphasia were severely impaired on the task of matching sentences to pictures. However, they performed close to controls in assessing the plausibility of pictorial depictions of agent–patient interactions. Overall, our results indicate that the left frontotemporal language network is recruited but not necessary for semantic processing of nonverbally presented events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101585922023-05-19 The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics Ivanova, Anna A. Mineroff, Zachary Zimmerer, Vitor Kanwisher, Nancy Varley, Rosemary Fedorenko, Evelina Neurobiol Lang (Camb) Research Article The ability to combine individual concepts of objects, properties, and actions into complex representations of the world is often associated with language. Yet combinatorial event-level representations can also be constructed from nonverbal input, such as visual scenes. Here, we test whether the language network in the human brain is involved in and necessary for semantic processing of events presented nonverbally. In Experiment 1, we scanned participants with fMRI while they performed a semantic plausibility judgment task versus a difficult perceptual control task on sentences and line drawings that describe/depict simple agent–patient interactions. We found that the language network responded robustly during the semantic task performed on both sentences and pictures (although its response to sentences was stronger). Thus, language regions in healthy adults are engaged during a semantic task performed on pictorial depictions of events. But is this engagement necessary? In Experiment 2, we tested two individuals with global aphasia, who have sustained massive damage to perisylvian language areas and display severe language difficulties, against a group of age-matched control participants. Individuals with aphasia were severely impaired on the task of matching sentences to pictures. However, they performed close to controls in assessing the plausibility of pictorial depictions of agent–patient interactions. Overall, our results indicate that the left frontotemporal language network is recruited but not necessary for semantic processing of nonverbally presented events. MIT Press 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10158592/ /pubmed/37216147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00030 Text en © 2021 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ivanova, Anna A.
Mineroff, Zachary
Zimmerer, Vitor
Kanwisher, Nancy
Varley, Rosemary
Fedorenko, Evelina
The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics
title The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics
title_full The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics
title_fullStr The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics
title_full_unstemmed The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics
title_short The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics
title_sort language network is recruited but not required for nonverbal event semantics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37216147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00030
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanovaannaa thelanguagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT mineroffzachary thelanguagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT zimmerervitor thelanguagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT kanwishernancy thelanguagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT varleyrosemary thelanguagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT fedorenkoevelina thelanguagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT ivanovaannaa languagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT mineroffzachary languagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT zimmerervitor languagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT kanwishernancy languagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT varleyrosemary languagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics
AT fedorenkoevelina languagenetworkisrecruitedbutnotrequiredfornonverbaleventsemantics