Cargando…

A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia

Numerous studies have investigated brain changes associated with interventions targeting a range of language problems in patients with aphasia. We strive to integrate the results of these studies to examine (1) whether the focus of the intervention (i.e., phonology, semantics, orthography, syntax, o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schevenels, Klara, Price, Cathy J., Zink, Inge, De Smedt, Bert, Vandermosten, Maaike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00019
_version_ 1785036969335586816
author Schevenels, Klara
Price, Cathy J.
Zink, Inge
De Smedt, Bert
Vandermosten, Maaike
author_facet Schevenels, Klara
Price, Cathy J.
Zink, Inge
De Smedt, Bert
Vandermosten, Maaike
author_sort Schevenels, Klara
collection PubMed
description Numerous studies have investigated brain changes associated with interventions targeting a range of language problems in patients with aphasia. We strive to integrate the results of these studies to examine (1) whether the focus of the intervention (i.e., phonology, semantics, orthography, syntax, or rhythmic-melodic) determines in which brain regions changes occur; and (2a) whether the most consistent changes occur within the language network or outside, and (2b) whether these are related to individual differences in language outcomes. The results of 32 studies with 204 unique patients were considered. Concerning (1), the location of treatment-related changes does not clearly depend on the type of language processing targeted. However, there is some support that rhythmic-melodic training has more impact on the right hemisphere than linguistic training. Concerning (2), we observed that language recovery is not only associated with changes in traditional language-related structures in the left hemisphere and homolog regions in the right hemisphere, but also with more medial and subcortical changes (e.g., precuneus and basal ganglia). Although it is difficult to draw strong conclusions, because there is a lack of systematic large-scale studies on this topic, this review highlights the need for an integrated approach to investigate how language interventions impact on the brain. Future studies need to focus on larger samples preserving subject-specific information (e.g., lesion effects) to cope with the inherent heterogeneity of stroke-induced aphasia. In addition, recovery-related changes in whole-brain connectivity patterns need more investigation to provide a comprehensive neural account of treatment-related brain plasticity and language recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101586312023-05-19 A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia Schevenels, Klara Price, Cathy J. Zink, Inge De Smedt, Bert Vandermosten, Maaike Neurobiol Lang (Camb) Review Article Numerous studies have investigated brain changes associated with interventions targeting a range of language problems in patients with aphasia. We strive to integrate the results of these studies to examine (1) whether the focus of the intervention (i.e., phonology, semantics, orthography, syntax, or rhythmic-melodic) determines in which brain regions changes occur; and (2a) whether the most consistent changes occur within the language network or outside, and (2b) whether these are related to individual differences in language outcomes. The results of 32 studies with 204 unique patients were considered. Concerning (1), the location of treatment-related changes does not clearly depend on the type of language processing targeted. However, there is some support that rhythmic-melodic training has more impact on the right hemisphere than linguistic training. Concerning (2), we observed that language recovery is not only associated with changes in traditional language-related structures in the left hemisphere and homolog regions in the right hemisphere, but also with more medial and subcortical changes (e.g., precuneus and basal ganglia). Although it is difficult to draw strong conclusions, because there is a lack of systematic large-scale studies on this topic, this review highlights the need for an integrated approach to investigate how language interventions impact on the brain. Future studies need to focus on larger samples preserving subject-specific information (e.g., lesion effects) to cope with the inherent heterogeneity of stroke-induced aphasia. In addition, recovery-related changes in whole-brain connectivity patterns need more investigation to provide a comprehensive neural account of treatment-related brain plasticity and language recovery. MIT Press 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10158631/ /pubmed/37215585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00019 Text en © 2020 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Schevenels, Klara
Price, Cathy J.
Zink, Inge
De Smedt, Bert
Vandermosten, Maaike
A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
title A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
title_full A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
title_fullStr A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
title_full_unstemmed A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
title_short A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
title_sort review on treatment-related brain changes in aphasia
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00019
work_keys_str_mv AT schevenelsklara areviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT pricecathyj areviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT zinkinge areviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT desmedtbert areviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT vandermostenmaaike areviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT schevenelsklara reviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT pricecathyj reviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT zinkinge reviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT desmedtbert reviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia
AT vandermostenmaaike reviewontreatmentrelatedbrainchangesinaphasia