Cargando…
Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the commonest reason for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the risk factors for revision due to PJI following TKA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62,087 primary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37140202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12307 |
_version_ | 1785037005643579392 |
---|---|
author | KEEMU, Hannes ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J KLÉN, Riku PANULA, Valtteri J VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J ESKELINEN, Antti P PAMILO, Konsta KETTUNEN, Jukka S PUHTO, Ari-Pekka VASARA, Anna I ELO, Laura L MÄKELÄ, Keijo T |
author_facet | KEEMU, Hannes ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J KLÉN, Riku PANULA, Valtteri J VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J ESKELINEN, Antti P PAMILO, Konsta KETTUNEN, Jukka S PUHTO, Ari-Pekka VASARA, Anna I ELO, Laura L MÄKELÄ, Keijo T |
author_sort | KEEMU, Hannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the commonest reason for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the risk factors for revision due to PJI following TKA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62,087 primary condylar TKAs registered between June 2014 and February 2020 with revision for PJI as the endpoint. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the first PJI revision using 25 potential patient- and surgical-related risk factors as covariates. RESULTS: 484 knees were revised for the first time during the first postoperative year because of PJI. The HRs for revision due to PJI in unadjusted analysis were 0.5 (0.4–0.6) for female sex, 0.7 (0.6–1.0) for BMI 25–29, and 1.6 (1.1–2.5) for BMI > 40 compared with BMI < 25, 4.0 (1.3–12) for preoperative fracture diagnosis compared with osteoarthritis, and 0.7 (0.5–0.9) for use of an antimicrobial incise drape. In adjusted analysis the HRs were 2.2 (1.4–3.5) for ASA class III–IV compared with class I, 1.7 (1.4–2.1) for intraoperative bleeding ≥ 100 mL, 1.4 (1.2–1.8) for use of a drain, 0.7 (0.5–1.0) for short duration of operation of 45–59 minutes, and 1.7 (1.3–2.3) for long operation duration > 120 min compared with 60–89 minutes, and 1.3 (1.0–1.8) for use of general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: We found increased risk for revision due to PJI when no incise drape was used. The use of drainage also increased the risk. Specializing in performing TKA reduces operative time and thereby also the PJI rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10158790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101587902023-05-05 Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 KEEMU, Hannes ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J KLÉN, Riku PANULA, Valtteri J VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J ESKELINEN, Antti P PAMILO, Konsta KETTUNEN, Jukka S PUHTO, Ari-Pekka VASARA, Anna I ELO, Laura L MÄKELÄ, Keijo T Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the commonest reason for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the risk factors for revision due to PJI following TKA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62,087 primary condylar TKAs registered between June 2014 and February 2020 with revision for PJI as the endpoint. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the first PJI revision using 25 potential patient- and surgical-related risk factors as covariates. RESULTS: 484 knees were revised for the first time during the first postoperative year because of PJI. The HRs for revision due to PJI in unadjusted analysis were 0.5 (0.4–0.6) for female sex, 0.7 (0.6–1.0) for BMI 25–29, and 1.6 (1.1–2.5) for BMI > 40 compared with BMI < 25, 4.0 (1.3–12) for preoperative fracture diagnosis compared with osteoarthritis, and 0.7 (0.5–0.9) for use of an antimicrobial incise drape. In adjusted analysis the HRs were 2.2 (1.4–3.5) for ASA class III–IV compared with class I, 1.7 (1.4–2.1) for intraoperative bleeding ≥ 100 mL, 1.4 (1.2–1.8) for use of a drain, 0.7 (0.5–1.0) for short duration of operation of 45–59 minutes, and 1.7 (1.3–2.3) for long operation duration > 120 min compared with 60–89 minutes, and 1.3 (1.0–1.8) for use of general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: We found increased risk for revision due to PJI when no incise drape was used. The use of drainage also increased the risk. Specializing in performing TKA reduces operative time and thereby also the PJI rate. Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10158790/ /pubmed/37140202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12307 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work. |
spellingShingle | Article KEEMU, Hannes ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J KLÉN, Riku PANULA, Valtteri J VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J ESKELINEN, Antti P PAMILO, Konsta KETTUNEN, Jukka S PUHTO, Ari-Pekka VASARA, Anna I ELO, Laura L MÄKELÄ, Keijo T Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 |
title | Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 |
title_full | Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 |
title_short | Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 |
title_sort | risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the finnish arthroplasty register from 2014 to 2020 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37140202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keemuhannes riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT alakylakasperij riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT klenriku riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT panulavaltterij riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT venalainenmikkos riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT haapakoskijaasonj riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT eskelinenanttip riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT pamilokonsta riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT kettunenjukkas riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT puhtoaripekka riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT vasaraannai riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT elolaural riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 AT makelakeijot riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020 |