Cargando…

Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the commonest reason for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the risk factors for revision due to PJI following TKA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62,087 primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KEEMU, Hannes, ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J, KLÉN, Riku, PANULA, Valtteri J, VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S, HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J, ESKELINEN, Antti P, PAMILO, Konsta, KETTUNEN, Jukka S, PUHTO, Ari-Pekka, VASARA, Anna I, ELO, Laura L, MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37140202
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12307
_version_ 1785037005643579392
author KEEMU, Hannes
ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J
KLÉN, Riku
PANULA, Valtteri J
VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S
HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J
ESKELINEN, Antti P
PAMILO, Konsta
KETTUNEN, Jukka S
PUHTO, Ari-Pekka
VASARA, Anna I
ELO, Laura L
MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
author_facet KEEMU, Hannes
ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J
KLÉN, Riku
PANULA, Valtteri J
VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S
HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J
ESKELINEN, Antti P
PAMILO, Konsta
KETTUNEN, Jukka S
PUHTO, Ari-Pekka
VASARA, Anna I
ELO, Laura L
MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
author_sort KEEMU, Hannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the commonest reason for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the risk factors for revision due to PJI following TKA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62,087 primary condylar TKAs registered between June 2014 and February 2020 with revision for PJI as the endpoint. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the first PJI revision using 25 potential patient- and surgical-related risk factors as covariates. RESULTS: 484 knees were revised for the first time during the first postoperative year because of PJI. The HRs for revision due to PJI in unadjusted analysis were 0.5 (0.4–0.6) for female sex, 0.7 (0.6–1.0) for BMI 25–29, and 1.6 (1.1–2.5) for BMI > 40 compared with BMI < 25, 4.0 (1.3–12) for preoperative fracture diagnosis compared with osteoarthritis, and 0.7 (0.5–0.9) for use of an antimicrobial incise drape. In adjusted analysis the HRs were 2.2 (1.4–3.5) for ASA class III–IV compared with class I, 1.7 (1.4–2.1) for intraoperative bleeding ≥ 100 mL, 1.4 (1.2–1.8) for use of a drain, 0.7 (0.5–1.0) for short duration of operation of 45–59 minutes, and 1.7 (1.3–2.3) for long operation duration > 120 min compared with 60–89 minutes, and 1.3 (1.0–1.8) for use of general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: We found increased risk for revision due to PJI when no incise drape was used. The use of drainage also increased the risk. Specializing in performing TKA reduces operative time and thereby also the PJI rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101587902023-05-05 Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020 KEEMU, Hannes ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J KLÉN, Riku PANULA, Valtteri J VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J ESKELINEN, Antti P PAMILO, Konsta KETTUNEN, Jukka S PUHTO, Ari-Pekka VASARA, Anna I ELO, Laura L MÄKELÄ, Keijo T Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the commonest reason for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the risk factors for revision due to PJI following TKA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62,087 primary condylar TKAs registered between June 2014 and February 2020 with revision for PJI as the endpoint. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the first PJI revision using 25 potential patient- and surgical-related risk factors as covariates. RESULTS: 484 knees were revised for the first time during the first postoperative year because of PJI. The HRs for revision due to PJI in unadjusted analysis were 0.5 (0.4–0.6) for female sex, 0.7 (0.6–1.0) for BMI 25–29, and 1.6 (1.1–2.5) for BMI > 40 compared with BMI < 25, 4.0 (1.3–12) for preoperative fracture diagnosis compared with osteoarthritis, and 0.7 (0.5–0.9) for use of an antimicrobial incise drape. In adjusted analysis the HRs were 2.2 (1.4–3.5) for ASA class III–IV compared with class I, 1.7 (1.4–2.1) for intraoperative bleeding ≥ 100 mL, 1.4 (1.2–1.8) for use of a drain, 0.7 (0.5–1.0) for short duration of operation of 45–59 minutes, and 1.7 (1.3–2.3) for long operation duration > 120 min compared with 60–89 minutes, and 1.3 (1.0–1.8) for use of general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: We found increased risk for revision due to PJI when no incise drape was used. The use of drainage also increased the risk. Specializing in performing TKA reduces operative time and thereby also the PJI rate. Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10158790/ /pubmed/37140202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12307 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
spellingShingle Article
KEEMU, Hannes
ALAKYLÄ, Kasperi J
KLÉN, Riku
PANULA, Valtteri J
VENÄLÄINEN, Mikko S
HAAPAKOSKI, Jaason J
ESKELINEN, Antti P
PAMILO, Konsta
KETTUNEN, Jukka S
PUHTO, Ari-Pekka
VASARA, Anna I
ELO, Laura L
MÄKELÄ, Keijo T
Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
title Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
title_full Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
title_fullStr Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
title_short Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020
title_sort risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the finnish arthroplasty register from 2014 to 2020
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37140202
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12307
work_keys_str_mv AT keemuhannes riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT alakylakasperij riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT klenriku riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT panulavaltterij riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT venalainenmikkos riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT haapakoskijaasonj riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT eskelinenanttip riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT pamilokonsta riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT kettunenjukkas riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT puhtoaripekka riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT vasaraannai riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT elolaural riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020
AT makelakeijot riskfactorsforrevisionduetoprostheticjointinfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplastybasedon62087kneesinthefinnisharthroplastyregisterfrom2014to2020