Cargando…

Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project

Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: San Luis, Carmela V, Gangadhara, Shreyas, Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153290
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37105
_version_ 1785037007058108416
author San Luis, Carmela V
Gangadhara, Shreyas
Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S
author_facet San Luis, Carmela V
Gangadhara, Shreyas
Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S
author_sort San Luis, Carmela V
collection PubMed
description Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after their stroke. To increase this ratio, we instituted a performance improvement project (PIP) to determine factors that contribute to OPFU and offered rescheduling after their missed appointment. Methods The nurse scheduler called patients labeled as “no-show,” asked for reasons for the missed appointment, and offered rescheduling accordingly. Other data were collected retrospectively. Results Of the 53 “no show” patients, most were females, single, Black, uninsured, and had a Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) of 0. Of the 30 patients who participated in the phone interview, a most common reason for “no show” was transportation. Fifteen out of 27 patients kept their rescheduled appointment, increasing patients seen in the clinic by 6.7%. Conclusion This PIP determined contributing factors on health care seeking practices of our stroke clinic patients allowing necessary improvements in our institute. Rescheduling increased the number of stroke patients seen in the stroke clinic. Our general neurology ambulatory department consequently adopted this process as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10158797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101587972023-05-05 Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project San Luis, Carmela V Gangadhara, Shreyas Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S Cureus Neurology Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after their stroke. To increase this ratio, we instituted a performance improvement project (PIP) to determine factors that contribute to OPFU and offered rescheduling after their missed appointment. Methods The nurse scheduler called patients labeled as “no-show,” asked for reasons for the missed appointment, and offered rescheduling accordingly. Other data were collected retrospectively. Results Of the 53 “no show” patients, most were females, single, Black, uninsured, and had a Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) of 0. Of the 30 patients who participated in the phone interview, a most common reason for “no show” was transportation. Fifteen out of 27 patients kept their rescheduled appointment, increasing patients seen in the clinic by 6.7%. Conclusion This PIP determined contributing factors on health care seeking practices of our stroke clinic patients allowing necessary improvements in our institute. Rescheduling increased the number of stroke patients seen in the stroke clinic. Our general neurology ambulatory department consequently adopted this process as well. Cureus 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10158797/ /pubmed/37153290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37105 Text en Copyright © 2023, San Luis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurology
San Luis, Carmela V
Gangadhara, Shreyas
Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S
Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
title Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
title_fullStr Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full_unstemmed Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
title_short Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
title_sort factors contributing to stroke clinic follow-up “no show”: a quality improvement project
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153290
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37105
work_keys_str_mv AT sanluiscarmelav factorscontributingtostrokeclinicfollowupnoshowaqualityimprovementproject
AT gangadharashreyas factorscontributingtostrokeclinicfollowupnoshowaqualityimprovementproject
AT noblezachristaohanas factorscontributingtostrokeclinicfollowupnoshowaqualityimprovementproject