Cargando…
Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project
Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37105 |
_version_ | 1785037007058108416 |
---|---|
author | San Luis, Carmela V Gangadhara, Shreyas Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S |
author_facet | San Luis, Carmela V Gangadhara, Shreyas Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S |
author_sort | San Luis, Carmela V |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after their stroke. To increase this ratio, we instituted a performance improvement project (PIP) to determine factors that contribute to OPFU and offered rescheduling after their missed appointment. Methods The nurse scheduler called patients labeled as “no-show,” asked for reasons for the missed appointment, and offered rescheduling accordingly. Other data were collected retrospectively. Results Of the 53 “no show” patients, most were females, single, Black, uninsured, and had a Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) of 0. Of the 30 patients who participated in the phone interview, a most common reason for “no show” was transportation. Fifteen out of 27 patients kept their rescheduled appointment, increasing patients seen in the clinic by 6.7%. Conclusion This PIP determined contributing factors on health care seeking practices of our stroke clinic patients allowing necessary improvements in our institute. Rescheduling increased the number of stroke patients seen in the stroke clinic. Our general neurology ambulatory department consequently adopted this process as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10158797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101587972023-05-05 Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project San Luis, Carmela V Gangadhara, Shreyas Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S Cureus Neurology Objective Controlling modifiable risk factors provides a strong impact on secondary stroke prevention. Stroke outpatient follow-up (OPFU) provides a significant role in assuring these goals are met. However, in our institute in 2018, one out of four patients was not seen in the stroke clinic after their stroke. To increase this ratio, we instituted a performance improvement project (PIP) to determine factors that contribute to OPFU and offered rescheduling after their missed appointment. Methods The nurse scheduler called patients labeled as “no-show,” asked for reasons for the missed appointment, and offered rescheduling accordingly. Other data were collected retrospectively. Results Of the 53 “no show” patients, most were females, single, Black, uninsured, and had a Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) of 0. Of the 30 patients who participated in the phone interview, a most common reason for “no show” was transportation. Fifteen out of 27 patients kept their rescheduled appointment, increasing patients seen in the clinic by 6.7%. Conclusion This PIP determined contributing factors on health care seeking practices of our stroke clinic patients allowing necessary improvements in our institute. Rescheduling increased the number of stroke patients seen in the stroke clinic. Our general neurology ambulatory department consequently adopted this process as well. Cureus 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10158797/ /pubmed/37153290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37105 Text en Copyright © 2023, San Luis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurology San Luis, Carmela V Gangadhara, Shreyas Nobleza, Christa O'Hana S Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project |
title | Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project |
title_full | Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project |
title_fullStr | Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project |
title_short | Factors Contributing to Stroke Clinic Follow-Up “No Show”: A Quality Improvement Project |
title_sort | factors contributing to stroke clinic follow-up “no show”: a quality improvement project |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanluiscarmelav factorscontributingtostrokeclinicfollowupnoshowaqualityimprovementproject AT gangadharashreyas factorscontributingtostrokeclinicfollowupnoshowaqualityimprovementproject AT noblezachristaohanas factorscontributingtostrokeclinicfollowupnoshowaqualityimprovementproject |