Cargando…
Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
To assess the rate of conversion to general anesthesia, sedative and analgesic drug-sparing effects, and complications of popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSNB) compared with a sham block during lower limb angioplasty. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of patients with chronic li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033690 |
_version_ | 1785037027659481088 |
---|---|
author | Noikham, Alif Tivirach, Wannapa Pongraweewan, Orawan Suphathamwit, Aphichat Puangpunngam, Nattawut Jirativanont, Tachawan |
author_facet | Noikham, Alif Tivirach, Wannapa Pongraweewan, Orawan Suphathamwit, Aphichat Puangpunngam, Nattawut Jirativanont, Tachawan |
author_sort | Noikham, Alif |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the rate of conversion to general anesthesia, sedative and analgesic drug-sparing effects, and complications of popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSNB) compared with a sham block during lower limb angioplasty. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who receive PSNB with 0.25% levobupivacaine 20 mL compared with a sham block (control) during lower limb angioplasty. Pain scores, conversion rate to general anesthesia, amount of sedoanalgesia drug usage, complications, and satisfaction with the anesthesia technique by surgeons and patients were assessed. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in this study. Two of 20 (10%) control group patients were converted to general anesthesia, while none of the patients in the intervention group required general anesthesia (P = .487). Pain scores before PSNB did not differ between the groups (P = .771). After the block, pain scores in the block group were lower than those in the control group: 0 (0, 1.5) (median, interquartile range) and 2.5 (0.5, 3.5), respectively (P = .024). The analgesic effect persisted until immediately after the surgery (P = .035). There was no difference in pain scores at the 24-hours follow-up visit (P = .270). The total propofol and fentanyl dosage requirements, a number of patients who required propofol and fentanyl, side effects, and satisfaction were not different between the groups. No major complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: PSNB provided effective pain relief during and immediately after lower limb angioplasty, but did not statistically affect the rate of conversion to general anesthesia, sedoanalgesia drug usage, or complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10158915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101589152023-05-05 Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial Noikham, Alif Tivirach, Wannapa Pongraweewan, Orawan Suphathamwit, Aphichat Puangpunngam, Nattawut Jirativanont, Tachawan Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 To assess the rate of conversion to general anesthesia, sedative and analgesic drug-sparing effects, and complications of popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSNB) compared with a sham block during lower limb angioplasty. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who receive PSNB with 0.25% levobupivacaine 20 mL compared with a sham block (control) during lower limb angioplasty. Pain scores, conversion rate to general anesthesia, amount of sedoanalgesia drug usage, complications, and satisfaction with the anesthesia technique by surgeons and patients were assessed. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in this study. Two of 20 (10%) control group patients were converted to general anesthesia, while none of the patients in the intervention group required general anesthesia (P = .487). Pain scores before PSNB did not differ between the groups (P = .771). After the block, pain scores in the block group were lower than those in the control group: 0 (0, 1.5) (median, interquartile range) and 2.5 (0.5, 3.5), respectively (P = .024). The analgesic effect persisted until immediately after the surgery (P = .035). There was no difference in pain scores at the 24-hours follow-up visit (P = .270). The total propofol and fentanyl dosage requirements, a number of patients who required propofol and fentanyl, side effects, and satisfaction were not different between the groups. No major complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: PSNB provided effective pain relief during and immediately after lower limb angioplasty, but did not statistically affect the rate of conversion to general anesthesia, sedoanalgesia drug usage, or complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10158915/ /pubmed/37145010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033690 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 3300 Noikham, Alif Tivirach, Wannapa Pongraweewan, Orawan Suphathamwit, Aphichat Puangpunngam, Nattawut Jirativanont, Tachawan Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title | Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noikhamalif poplitealsciaticnerveblockforhighriskpatientsundergoinglowerlimbangioplastyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tivirachwannapa poplitealsciaticnerveblockforhighriskpatientsundergoinglowerlimbangioplastyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pongraweewanorawan poplitealsciaticnerveblockforhighriskpatientsundergoinglowerlimbangioplastyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suphathamwitaphichat poplitealsciaticnerveblockforhighriskpatientsundergoinglowerlimbangioplastyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT puangpunngamnattawut poplitealsciaticnerveblockforhighriskpatientsundergoinglowerlimbangioplastyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jirativanonttachawan poplitealsciaticnerveblockforhighriskpatientsundergoinglowerlimbangioplastyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial |