Cargando…

Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo, Carvalho, José da Conceição, Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser, Coelho, Ana Laura Batista, Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari, Ferreira, Lydia Masako, Veiga, Daniela Francescato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37132756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb381223
_version_ 1785037046358736896
author de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo
Carvalho, José da Conceição
Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser
Coelho, Ana Laura Batista
Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari
Ferreira, Lydia Masako
Veiga, Daniela Francescato
author_facet de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo
Carvalho, José da Conceição
Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser
Coelho, Ana Laura Batista
Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari
Ferreira, Lydia Masako
Veiga, Daniela Francescato
author_sort de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, ‘Support,’ had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was ‘Qualification’ (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by ‘Result’ (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between ‘type of oncologic surgery’ and ‘intentions of loyalty to the service’ (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between ‘education’ and ‘quality of the environment’ (ρ = –0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient’s level of education, the higher the score attributed to ‘relationship’ (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of ‘aesthetics and functionality’ (ρ = –0.237; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10159012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101590122023-05-05 Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Carvalho, José da Conceição Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser Coelho, Ana Laura Batista Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Ferreira, Lydia Masako Veiga, Daniela Francescato Acta Cir Bras Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, ‘Support,’ had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was ‘Qualification’ (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by ‘Result’ (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between ‘type of oncologic surgery’ and ‘intentions of loyalty to the service’ (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between ‘education’ and ‘quality of the environment’ (ρ = –0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient’s level of education, the higher the score attributed to ‘relationship’ (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of ‘aesthetics and functionality’ (ρ = –0.237; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10159012/ /pubmed/37132756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb381223 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo
Carvalho, José da Conceição
Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser
Coelho, Ana Laura Batista
Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari
Ferreira, Lydia Masako
Veiga, Daniela Francescato
Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
title Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
title_full Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
title_fullStr Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
title_full_unstemmed Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
title_short Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
title_sort quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37132756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb381223
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiracarloseduardo qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients
AT carvalhojosedaconceicao qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients
AT kuhnenricardobeckhauser qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients
AT coelhoanalaurabatista qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients
AT dimonteisabellascavariellozicari qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients
AT ferreiralydiamasako qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients
AT veigadanielafrancescato qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients