Cargando…
Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37132756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb381223 |
_version_ | 1785037046358736896 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Carvalho, José da Conceição Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser Coelho, Ana Laura Batista Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Ferreira, Lydia Masako Veiga, Daniela Francescato |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Carvalho, José da Conceição Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser Coelho, Ana Laura Batista Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Ferreira, Lydia Masako Veiga, Daniela Francescato |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, ‘Support,’ had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was ‘Qualification’ (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by ‘Result’ (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between ‘type of oncologic surgery’ and ‘intentions of loyalty to the service’ (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between ‘education’ and ‘quality of the environment’ (ρ = –0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient’s level of education, the higher the score attributed to ‘relationship’ (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of ‘aesthetics and functionality’ (ρ = –0.237; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10159012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101590122023-05-05 Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Carvalho, José da Conceição Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser Coelho, Ana Laura Batista Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Ferreira, Lydia Masako Veiga, Daniela Francescato Acta Cir Bras Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, ‘Support,’ had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was ‘Qualification’ (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by ‘Result’ (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between ‘type of oncologic surgery’ and ‘intentions of loyalty to the service’ (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between ‘education’ and ‘quality of the environment’ (ρ = –0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient’s level of education, the higher the score attributed to ‘relationship’ (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of ‘aesthetics and functionality’ (ρ = –0.237; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10159012/ /pubmed/37132756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb381223 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Carvalho, José da Conceição Kuhnen, Ricardo Beckhauser Coelho, Ana Laura Batista Di Monte, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Ferreira, Lydia Masako Veiga, Daniela Francescato Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
title | Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
title_full | Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
title_fullStr | Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
title_short | Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
title_sort | quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37132756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb381223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiracarloseduardo qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients AT carvalhojosedaconceicao qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients AT kuhnenricardobeckhauser qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients AT coelhoanalaurabatista qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients AT dimonteisabellascavariellozicari qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients AT ferreiralydiamasako qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients AT veigadanielafrancescato qualityofbreastreconstructionserviceatauniversityhospitalasassessedbythepatients |